Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Motion Hearing (PI or TRO Hearing-Evidentiary) — Richard Lee Brown v. Alex Azar, Case 1:20-cv-03702-JPB (minute text)

Motion Hearing (PI or TRO Hearing-Evidentiary) — Richard Lee Brown v. Alex Azar, Case 1:20-cv-03702-JPB (minute text)

Summary

Minute sheet for proceedings in open court on 10/20/2020 in Brown et al v. Azar et al, Case 1:20-cv-03702-JPB, Document 46 filed 10/20/20. The Court heard oral argument on the pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction and took the motion under advisement, with a written order to follow. Caleb Kruckenberg appeared representing Richard Lee Brown, National Apartment Association, David Krausz, Jeffrey Rondeau and Sonya Jones. Leslie Vigen appeared representing the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar and Nina B. Witkofsky. The hearing commenced at 10:15 A.M. and concluded at 11:26 A.M.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2020-10-20

Cite this document

“Motion Hearing (PI or TRO Hearing-Evidentiary) — Richard Lee Brown v. Alex Azar, Case 1:20-cv-03702-JPB (minute text).” Original at archive.org, dated 2020-10-20. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2020-10-20-brown-et-al-v-azar-et-al/, SHA-256 2609c68199150b0d16c44b1c25a3369965e3137f9f7651f73721e5ac9f62c6c1.

Full text

ATTORNEY(S)
PRESENT:
Caleb Kruckenberg representing National Apartment Association
Caleb Kruckenberg representing David Krausz
Caleb Kruckenberg representing Jeffrey Rondeau
Caleb Kruckenberg representing Richard Lee Brown
Caleb Kruckenberg representing Sonya Jones
Leslie Vigen representing U.S. Centers For Disease Control and Prevention
Leslie Vigen representing U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Leslie Vigen representing Alex Azar
Leslie Vigen representing Nina B. Witkofsky
PROCEEDING
CATEGORY:
Motion Hearing(PI or TRO Hearing-Evidentiary);
MOTIONS RULED ON:
[18]Motion for Preliminary Injunction TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT
MINUTE TEXT:
HEARING STATUS:
The Court held oral argument on the pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
The Court took motion under advisement.  Written order to follow.
Hearing Concluded
1:20-cv-03702-JPB
Brown et al v. Azar et al
Honorable J. P. Boulee
Minute Sheet for proceedings held In Open Court on 10/20/2020.
 TIME COURT COMMENCED: 10:15 A.M.
 TIME COURT CONCLUDED: 11:26 A.M.
 TIME IN COURT: 1:11
 OFFICE LOCATION: Atlanta
 COURT REPORTER: Penny Coudriet
 DEPUTY CLERK: Brittney Walker
CM/ECF-GA Northern District Court
https://gand-ecf.sso.dcn/cgi-bin/GANDc_mkmin.pl?505540392077373-...
1 of 1
10/20/2020, 12:11 PM
Case 1:20-cv-03702-JPB   Document 46   Filed 10/20/20   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.280996.46.0_1.pdf
Size
138,266 bytes
SHA-256
2609c68199150b0d16c44b1c25a3369965e3137f9f7651f73721e5ac9f62c6c1
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.280996.46.0_1.pdf
Original
archive.org
  1. Order Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Brown v. Azarsame docket · 2020-10-29
  2. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Brown v. Azarsame docket · 2020-10-16
  3. Circuit from the memorandum and order of the district court, entered on October 29same docket · 2020-10-29
  4. Exhibit — CDC/HHS FAQ on Eviction Moratorium — Brown v. Azarsame docket · 2020-10-15
  5. Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal — Brown v. Azarsame docket · 2020-11-09
  6. Amicus Curiae Brief in Opposition to PI (Economic Data) — Brown v. Azar (N.D. Ga., 2020-10-13, 2)same docket · 2020-10-13
  7. Amicus Curiae Brief in Opposition to PI (Housing Advocates) — Brown v. Azar (N.D. Ga., 2020-10-13, 1)same docket · 2020-10-13
  8. Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal — Brown v. Azar (N.D. Ga.)same docket · 2020-11-23
  9. Brief of Amici Curiae of the American Academy of Pediatrics, et al. Appendix B Table of Authoritiessame docket · 2020-10-09
  10. Order to Show Cause (Mootness) — Brown v. Azar (N.D. Ga.)same docket · 2022-01-04
  11. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSsame docket · 2020-10-09
  12. Eleventh Circuit Order Dismissing Appeal as Moot — Brown v. Azarsame docket · 2022-01-06
  13. Amicus Brief Appendix A (Expert Declarations) — Brown v. Azarsame docket · 2020-10-09
  14. Amicus Curiae Brief (American Academy of Pediatrics et al.) — Brown v. Azar (N.D. Ga.)same docket · 2020-10-09
  15. Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Brown v. Azarsame docket · 2020-10-02
  16. Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Brown v. Azar (N.D. Ga.)same docket · 2020-09-18
  17. Motion for Preliminary Injunction - Brown et al. v. Azar et al.same docket · 2020-09-18
  18. Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Brown v. Azar (N.D. Ga.)same docket · 2020-09-18

Part of: Brown et al. v. Azar et al. · Brown et al. v. Azar et al. · Other pandemic litigation · Federal court dockets (PACER) · 2020 · Source documents

Back to top