Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents [Proposed] Order Granting Motion For Administrative Stay

[Proposed] Order Granting Motion For Administrative Stay

Date
2019-07-16

Full text

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAY

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Adam Siegler (SBN 116233)
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
1840 Century Park East
Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 586-7700
Facsimile: (310) 586-7800
Email:sieglera@gtlaw.com

Jonathan K. Ogata (SBN 325914)
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
1201 K Street, Suite 1100
Sacramento, CA
Telephone: (916) 442-1111
Email:ogataj@gtlaw.com

Steven G. Barringer*
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
2101 L Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20037
Telephone: (202) 331-3108
Facsimile: (202) 261-0114
Email: barringers@gtlaw.com

* Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming
Caroline J. Heller*
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
200 Park Ave
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: (212) 801-9200
Facsimile: (212) 801-6400
Email: hellerc@gtlaw.com

Gregory P. Copeland*
Sarah T. Gillman*
RAPID DEFENSE NETWORK
11 Broadway, Suite 615
New York, NY 10004-1490
Telephone: (212) 843-0910
Facsimile: (212) 257-7033
Email: gregory@defensenetwork.org
Email: sarah@defensenetwork.org

Attorneys for Proposed Plaintiff-Intervenors
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EAST BAY SANCTUARY
COVENANT, et al.,

Plaintiffs,
         vs.

WILLIAM BARR, et al.,
Defendants.
 Case No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST
[Judge:  Hon. Jon S. Tigar]
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PROPOSED INTERVENORS’
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
STAY PENDING DISPOSITION OF
MOTION TO INTERVENE AND
MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER

Date Action Filed: July 16, 2019

Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST   Document 96-1   Filed 10/16/20   Page 1 of 2

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAY

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Motion for an Administrative Stay came on for hearing
before Judge Tigar in the above-captioned courthouse on ______________, 2020 at
_________.
After full consideration of the evidence and points and authorities submitted by
Proposed Plaintiff-Intervenors, the Court:
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
(a) GRANTS Proposed Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Motion for an Administrative Stay;
and
(b) Defendants are enjoined from taking any action to remove Proposed Plaintiff-
Intervenors from the United States until further order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated:  ______________________              ____________________________________
        Honorable Jon S. Tigar
                                                                     United States District Court Judge

Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST   Document 96-1   Filed 10/16/20   Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.344869.96.1.pdf
Size
127,890 bytes
SHA-256
6d074219306f0cde781ce4c782930dd317291659c9e1b73e6c8351a7f6be9a7a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.344869.96.1.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top