Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Vyaire - Dell Objection to Proposed Cure Notice

Vyaire - Dell Objection to Proposed Cure Notice

Date
2016-11-03

Summary

An objection filed July 24, 2024 as Doc 309 by Dell-Mettawa, LLC in the jointly administered Chapter 11 cases of Vyaire Medical, Inc., et al., Case No. 24-11217 (BLS), in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. It objects to the debtors' First Notice to Contract Parties of Potentially Assumed and Assigned Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases [D.I. 256] as it relates to an Office Lease dated November 3, 2016. Dell-Mettawa states that the notice names the wrong counterparty, treats the lease, its two amendments and the Consent to Sublease as divisible, and ties the cure amount only to the Consent to Sublease. It itemizes a cure amount of not less than $269,816.78, or $550,076.25 if August 2024 obligations are unpaid, citing 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(3). The five-page objection is signed by Saul Ewing LLP and Gould & Ratner LLP.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

               Case 24-11217-BLS        Doc 309     Filed 07/24/24     Page 1 of 5




                    IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
                         FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

In re:                                         )   Chapter 11
                                               )
VYAIRE MEDICAL, INC., et al.,                  )   Case No. 24-11217 (BLS)
                                               )
                      Debtors.                 )   (Jointly Administered)
                                               )
                                               )   Related D.I.: 256
                                               )

           OBJECTION OF DELL-METTAWA, LLC TO FIRST NOTICE TO
         CONTRACT PARTIES OF POTENTIALLY ASSUMED AND ASSIGNED
              EXECUTORY CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED LEASES

         Dell-Mettawa, LLC (assignee of Dell Realty Company) (“Dell”), by and through its

undersigned attorneys, hereby objects to the above captioned debtors and debtors in possession’s

(the “Debtors”) First Notice to Contract Parties of Potentially Assumed and Assigned Executory

Contracts and Unexpired Leases [D.I. 256] (the “Notice”) and states as follows:

         1.    Dell and Debtor Vyaire Medical, Inc. (the “Debtor”) are parties to that certain

Office Lease dated November 3, 2016 (as amended by that certain First Amendment to Lease

dated December 30, 2016, that certain Second Amendment to Lease dated January 19, 2022, and

as otherwise modified the “Lease”). The Lease is for space in a portion of Dell’s real property

that consists of an office building and is located at 26125 North Riverwoods Boulevard,

Mettawa, Illinois (the “Premises”).

         2.    As stated by the Debtors in footnote 1 of the Notice and in other filings, the

Premises serves as the Debtor’s principal place of business and the Debtors’ service address in

these chapter 11 cases. The Debtor also subleases a portion of the Premises to a third party.

         3.    Rows 1931 through 1968 of the Notice appear to list the Lease and what the

Debtors believe are agreements relating to the Lease (collectively with the Lease, the “Lease
             Case 24-11217-BLS         Doc 309      Filed 07/24/24     Page 2 of 5




Documents”). Several of the Lease Documents listed in the Notice are duplicative of one

another.

A.     Dell objects to the Notice because it lists the wrong counterparty to the Lease
       Documents.

       4.     Dell objects to the Notice because it incorrectly states that the counterparty to the

Lease Documents is Dell Realty Company. Through a series of transactions, the applicable

Lease Documents were assigned to Dell on or about January 10, 2019. Therefore, the Notice

should list “Dell-Mettawa, LLC,” and not “Dell Realty Company,” as the “Unique Vendor

Name” with respect to the Lease and any other applicable Lease Documents. Additionally, any

assumption or assumption and assignment of the Lease or any other applicable Lease Documents

should involve “Dell-Mettawa, LLC” and not “Dell Realty Company.”

B.     Dell objects to any assumption or assumption and assignment of the Lease to the
       extent the Debtors seek to assume or assume and assign the Office Lease without its
       Amendments and without the Consent to Sublease.

       5.     If the Debtors seek to assume or assume and assign the Lease, such assumption or

assumption and assignment must include the complete Lease with all of its material parts. This

includes the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, and the Consent to Sublease dated

January 19, 2022 (the “Consent to Sublease”) for the Debtor’s sublease to Brunswick

Corporation (which also contains material agreements with respect to the Lease). The Notice

lists the Lease Documents (often listing the same agreement twice) as if they are divisible

agreements. This is incorrect with respect to the Lease and the Consent to Sublease. Dell and

the Debtor’s lease arrangement is evidenced by the original Office Lease, its two Amendments,

and the Consent to Sublease. If these agreements are to be assumed or assumed and assigned,

they must be assumed or assumed and assigned together because collectively, they form lease

arrangement between Dell and the Debtor.

                                                2
               Case 24-11217-BLS       Doc 309      Filed 07/24/24   Page 3 of 5




C.     Dell objects to the Notice because it does not accurately associate the cure amount
       with the Lease.

       6.       Dell objects because the Notice incorrectly associates the cure amount with just

the Consent to Sublease. Rather, the cure amount should be associated with the Lease together

with the Consent to Sublease that must be assumed with it.

D.     Dell objects to the Debtors’ calculation of the Cure Amount.

       7.       Dell objects to the Debtors’ calculation of the Cure Amount. If an assumption or

assumption and assignment of the Lease Documents occurs in August 2024, the cure amount will

be not less than $550,076.25. If the Debtors pay their August obligations prior to assumption or

assumption and assignment in August 2024 (as they are required to do pursuant 11 U.S.C.

§ 365(d)(3)), the cure amount will be not less than $269,816.78. The cure amount consists of the

following amounts owed by the Debtor under the Lease:

            May 2024 Base Rent                                  $162,607.50
            May 2024 Expense Payment                             $92,476.72
            May 2024 Tax Payment                                 $25,175.25
            June 2024 Base Rent                                 $162,607.50
            June 2024 Expense Payment                            $92,476.72
            June 2024 Tax Payment                                $25,175.25
            Electric Charges Billable (Invoice #30510)             $4,992.96
            Electric Charges Billable (Invoice #30794)             $4,992.96
            2022 YE Reconciliation Credit                     ($149,966.37)
            2023 YE Reconciliation Credit                     ($148,820.36)
            Prepay Credit (March 1, 2024)                        ($1,140.81)
            Prepay Credit (April 9, 2024)                          ($380.27)
            Prepay Credit (July 2, 2024)                           ($380.27)
            Total before August 1, 2024                         $269,816.78
            August 2024 Base Rent                               $162,607.50
            August 2024 Expense Payment                          $92,476.72
            August 2024 Tax Payment                              $25,175.25
            Total as of August 1, 2024 (if the Debtors
            do not pay their August obligations)               $550,076.25

       8.       The cure amount will also consist of any other unpaid obligations that accrue

prior to assumption or assumption and assignment. For the avoidance of doubt, if the Lease is

                                                3
              Case 24-11217-BLS         Doc 309      Filed 07/24/24    Page 4 of 5




assumed and assigned and the 2025 reconciliation pursuant to Exhibit E of the Lease reveals a

credit is owing from Dell, Dell will apply the credit for the benefit of the new “Tenant” under the

Lease even if a portion of the credit is for a period that the Debtor paid. To the extent the

Debtors are not in agreement with this approach, the Debtors should be required to set forth their

position immediately, and this Court should determine any disagreement.

       9.      Dell’s investigation into the amounts it is owed by the Debtor continues, and Dell

expressly reserves its right to make changes to the cure amount and this Objection. Dell

expressly reserves all other rights including, without limitation, the right to make objections to

the assumption or the assumption and assignment of any of the Lease Documents, the right to

make objections to any proposed adequate assurance of future performance with respect to any

of the Lease Documents, the right to make objections to any proposed assignee of any of the

Lease Documents, and the right to assert any claims against the Debtors to which Dell is entitled.

       WHEREFORE, Dell respectfully requests that this Court (a) require that any assumption

or assumption and assignment of the Lease include the Office Lease together with its

Amendments and the Consent to Sublease, (b) require that any assumption or assumption and

assignment of any of the applicable Lease Documents include Dell-Mettawa, LLC rather than

Dell Realty Company as the counterparty, (c) require payment of the cure amount in connection

with the Lease together with the Consent to Sublease, (d) correct the cure amount of the Lease

together with the Consent to Sublease to be as set forth above, and (e) grant such other and

further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.




                                                 4
            Case 24-11217-BLS   Doc 309   Filed 07/24/24   Page 5 of 5




Dated: July 24, 2024               SAUL EWING LLP
       Wilmington, DE
                                   /s/ Evan T. Miller
                                   Evan T. Miller (No. 5364)
                                   1201 North Market Street, Suite 2300
                                   P.O. Box 1266
                                   Wilmington, DE 19899
                                   Phone: (302) 421-6864
                                   Email: evan.miller@saul.com

                                   and

                                   Matthew A. Olins, Esq.
                                   GOULD & RATNER LLP
                                   222 North LaSalle Street, Suite 300
                                   Chicago, IL 60601
                                   Phone: (312) 899-1661
                                   Email: molins@gouldratner.com

                                   Counsel to Dell-Mettawa, LLC




                                      5


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.deb.193283.309.0.pdf
Size
215,852 bytes
SHA-256
e2b7d7994ae4a92f9204805b7641fb55a05ca2d551699efe475af00ff56a4bef
Our copy
gov.uscourts.deb.193283.309.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top