Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order (I) Authorizing

Order (I) Authorizing

Date
2012-02-29

Summary

An order approving procedures to reject executory contracts and unexpired leases, entered July 11, 2024 as Doc 250 in In re Vyaire Medical, Inc., et al., Case No. 24-11217 (BLS), the Chapter 11 cases in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. The order grants the motion at Docket No. 117 on a final basis and approves procedures under which the debtors file rejection notices identifying each contract, the counterparties, the proposed rejection date and any property to be abandoned, limited to 100 counterparties per notice. Objections are due fourteen days after a rejection notice is served, with at least seven days' notice of any hearing on an unresolved objection. It also provides for abandonment of property under section 554 of the Bankruptcy Code and sets rejection damages claims thirty days after entry of an approving order.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                 Case 24-11217-BLS              Doc 250          Filed 07/11/24      Page 1 of 7




                        IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

                                                             )
In re:                                                       )        Chapter 11
                                                             )
VYAIRE MEDICAL, INC., et al.,1                               )        Case No. 24-11217 (BLS)
                                                             )
                           Debtors.                          )        (Jointly Administered)
                                                             )
                                                             )        Re: Docket No. 117

                        ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING
           AND APPROVING PROCEDURES TO REJECT EXECUTORY
    CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED LEASES AND (II) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

         Upon the motion (the “Motion”)2 of the above-captioned debtors and debtors in

possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) for the entry of an order (this “Order”), (a) authorizing

and approving procedures for rejecting executory contracts and unexpired leases, and

(b) granting related relief, all as more fully set forth in the Motion; and upon the First Day

Declaration; and the United States District Court for the District of Delaware has jurisdiction

over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334, which was referred to the Court under 28 U.S.C.

§ 157 and the Amended Standing Order of Reference from the United States District Court for

the District of Delaware, dated February 29, 2012; and this Court having found that this is a core

proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2); and this Court having found that this Court may

enter a final order consistent with Article III of the United States Constitution; and this Court

having found that venue of this proceeding and the Motion in this district is proper pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and this Court having found that the relief requested in the Motion


1    The last four digits of Debtor Vyaire Medical, Inc.’s federal tax identification number are 6495. A complete list
     of each of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases and each such Debtor’s federal tax identification number may
     be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at https://omniagentsolutions.com/Vyaire.
     The location of Debtor Vyaire Medical, Inc.’s principal place of business and the Debtors’ service address in
     these chapter 11 cases is 26125 North Riverwoods Boulevard, Mettawa, Illinois, USA 60045.
2    Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.
               Case 24-11217-BLS           Doc 250      Filed 07/11/24      Page 2 of 7




is in the best interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and other parties in interest; and this

Court having found that the Debtors’ notice of the Motion and opportunity for a hearing on the

Motion were appropriate and no other notice need be provided; and this Court having reviewed

the Motion and having heard the statements in support of the relief requested therein at a hearing

before this Court (the “Hearing”); and this Court having determined that the legal and factual

bases set forth in the Motion and at the Hearing establish just cause for the relief granted herein;

and upon all of the proceedings had before this Court; and after due deliberation and sufficient

cause appearing therefor, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

        1.      The Motion is granted on a final basis as set forth herein.

        2.      The following procedures (the “Contract Rejection Procedures”) are approved in

connection with rejecting Contracts:

                    a. Rejection Notice. The Debtors shall file one or more notices, in
                       consultation with the Required DIP Lenders, substantially in the form
                       annexed as Exhibit 1 hereto (the “Rejection Notice”), to reject a Contract
                       or Contracts pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, which
                       Rejection Notice(s) shall set forth, among other things, with respect to
                       each Contract listed on the Rejection Notice: (i) the Contract or Contracts
                       to be rejected; (ii) the Debtor or Debtors party to such Contract; (iii) the
                       names and addresses of the counterparties to such Contract; (iv) the
                       proposed effective date of the rejection for such Contract (the “Rejection
                       Date”); and (v) if such Contract is an unexpired lease, the location affected
                       by the Rejection Notice and a summary description of personal property to
                       be abandoned, if any (the “Abandoned Property”). The Rejection Notice
                       shall also set forth the deadlines and procedures for filing objections to the
                       Rejection Notice (as set forth below). Each Rejection Notice may list
                       multiple Contracts; provided that the number of counterparties to
                       Contracts listed on any one Rejection Notice shall be limited to no more
                       than 100. For the avoidance of doubt, the Debtors may serve multiple
                       Rejection Notices, as long as the counterparties listed on each notice are
                       limited to no more than 100.

                    b. Service of Rejection Notices. The Debtors will cause each Rejection
                       Notice to be served (i) via email, if available, and by overnight delivery
                       service upon (a) the Contract counterparties affected by such Rejection
                       Notice (each, a “Rejection Counterparty”) at the notice address provided
                       in the applicable Contract (and upon such Rejection Counterparty’s

                                                    2
                Case 24-11217-BLS            Doc 250       Filed 07/11/24        Page 3 of 7




                         counsel, if known) and (b) all parties who may have any interest in any
                         Abandoned Property (if known); and (ii) by first class mail, email, or fax
                         upon: (a) counsel to the 1L Ad Hoc Group, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
                         LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166-0193, Attn.: Scott J.
                         Greenberg (SGreenberg@gibsondunn.com), Jason Zachary Goldstein
                         (JGoldstein@gibsondunn.com),                  Joshua                Brody
                         (JBrody@gibsondunn.com),                and         Kevin           Liang
                         (KLiang@gibsondunn.com); (b) counsel to the 1L Ad Hoc Group,
                         Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, 919 North Market Street, 17th Floor,
                         Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn.: Laura Davis Jones (ljones@pszjlaw.com)
                         and Timothy P. Cairns (tcairns@pszjlaw.com); (c) the United States
                         Trustee for the District of Delaware, Attn.: Benjamin A. Hackman
                         (Benjamin.A.Hackman@usdoj.gov); (d) proposed counsel to the
                         Committee, (i) McDermott Will & Emery LLP, The Brandywine Building,
                         1000 N. West Street, Suite 1400, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attn.:
                         David      Hurst     (dhurst@mwe.com)        and     Maris     Kandestin
                         (mkandestin@mwe.com) and (ii) McDermott Will & Emery LLP, One
                         Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017-3852, Attn: Darren Azman
                         (dazman@mwe.com) and Kristin Going (kgoing@mwe.com); (e) the
                         United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Delaware; and (f) any
                         party that has requested notice pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002
                         (collectively, the “Master Notice Parties”).

                     c. Objection Procedures. Parties objecting to a proposed rejection must file
                        and serve a written objection3 so that such objection is filed with this
                        Court on the docket of the Debtors’ chapter 11 cases no later than fourteen
                        (14) days after the date the Debtors file and serve the relevant Rejection
                        Notice (the “Rejection Objection Deadline”) and promptly serve such
                        objection on the following parties (collectively, the “Objection Service
                        Parties”): (a) the Debtors, Vyaire Medical, Inc., 26125 North Riverwoods
                        Boulevard, Mettawa, Illinois 60045, Attn.: Charles Braley
                        (cbraley@alixpartners.com); (b) proposed co-counsel to the Debtors
                        (i) Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 601 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York
                        10022, Attn.: Joshua A. Sussberg, P.C. (joshua.sussberg@kirkland.com),
                        Chris Ceresa (chris.ceresa@kirkland.com), and Tiffani Chanroo
                        (tiffani.chanroo@kirkland.com), and (ii) Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 333 Wolf
                        Point Plaza, Chicago, Illinois, 60654, Attn.: Spencer A. Winters
                        (spencer.winters@kirkland.com)        and      Yusuf       U.      Salloum
                        (yusuf.salloum@kirkland.com); (c) proposed co-counsel to the Debtors
                        (i) Cole Schotz P.C., 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410, Wilmington,
                        Delaware 19801, Attn: Patrick J. Reilley, Esq. (preilley@coleschotz.com),
                        Stacy L. Newman (snewman@coleschotz.com), Michael E. Fitzpatrick,
                        Esq. (mfitzpatrick@coleschotz.com), and (ii) Cole Schotz P.C., Court
                        Plaza North, 25 Main Street, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, Attn.:

3   An objection to the rejection of any particular Contract listed on a Rejection Notice shall not constitute an
    objection to the rejection of any other Contract listed on such Rejection Notice.

                                                       3
Case 24-11217-BLS       Doc 250      Filed 07/11/24     Page 4 of 7




      Michael D. Sirota, Esq. (msirota@coleschotz.com), Warren A. Usatine,
      Esq. (wusatine@coleschotz.com); (d) counsel to the 1L Ad Hoc Group,
      Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166-
      0193, Attn.: Scott J. Greenberg (SGreenberg@gibsondunn.com), Jason
      Zachary Goldstein (JGoldstein@gibsondunn.com), Joshua Brody
      (JBrody@gibsondunn.com),            and          Kevin           Liang
      (KLiang@gibsondunn.com); (e) counsel to the 1L Ad Hoc Group,
      Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, 919 North Market Street, 17th Floor,
      Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn.: Laura Davis Jones (ljones@pszjlaw.com)
      and Timothy P. Cairns (tcairns@pszjlaw.com); (f) the United States
      Trustee for the District of Delaware, Attn.: Benjamin A. Hackman
      (Benjamin.A.Hackman@usdoj.gov); and (g) proposed counsel to the
      Committee, (i) McDermott Will & Emery LLP, The Brandywine Building,
      1000 N. West Street, Suite 1400, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attn.:
      David     Hurst     (dhurst@mwe.com)      and     Maris      Kandestin
      (mkandestin@mwe.com) and (ii) McDermott Will & Emery LLP, One
      Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017-3852, Attn: Darren Azman
      (dazman@mwe.com) and Kristin Going (kgoing@mwe.com).

   d. No Objection Timely Filed. If no objection to the rejection of any
      Contract is timely filed, then the Debtors shall submit a proposed form of
      order substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B to the Rejection
      Notice approving the rejection of each Contract listed in the applicable
      Rejection Notice, for entry by the Court under certification of counsel, and
      each such Contract shall be deemed rejected as of the Rejection Date set
      forth in the Rejection Notice or such other date as the Debtors and the
      counterparty or counterparties to such Contract(s) agree; provided that the
      effective date of a rejection of a nonresidential real property lease shall not
      occur until the later of (i) the date the Debtors file and serve a Rejection
      Notice for such lease, (ii) the Rejection Date set forth in the Rejection
      Notice, and (iii) the date the Debtors relinquish control of the premises by
      notifying the affected landlord or their counsel in writing (email sufficient)
      of the Debtors’ surrender of the premises and turning over, surrendering,
      or allowing to be reset, as applicable, the keys, key codes, and security
      codes, if any, to the affected landlord.

   e. Unresolved Timely Objections. If one or more objections to the rejection
      of any Contract(s) listed in the applicable Rejection Notice is timely filed
      and properly served as specified above and not withdrawn or resolved, the
      Debtors shall file a notice for a hearing to consider the rejection of the
      Contract(s) implicated by such objection(s) and shall provide at least
      seven (7) days’ notice of such hearing to each objecting party and the
      Objection Service Parties. If any such objection is overruled or
      withdrawn, the Contract(s) that are the subject of such objection shall be
      rejected as of the Rejection Date set forth in the Rejection Notice or such
      other date as agreed by the parties or determined by the Court as set forth
      in any order overruling such objection.

                                 4
Case 24-11217-BLS       Doc 250      Filed 07/11/24     Page 5 of 7




   f. No Application of Security Deposits. If the Debtors have deposited
      monies with a Rejection Counterparty as a security deposit or other
      arrangement in connection with such rejected Contract, such Rejection
      Counterparty may not setoff, recoup, or otherwise use such deposit
      without the prior approval of the Court, unless the Debtors and the
      applicable Rejection Counterparty, in consultation with the Committee
      and the Required DIP Lenders, otherwise agree in writing.

   g. Abandoned Property. The Debtors are authorized, but not directed, at any
      time on or before the applicable Rejection Date, to remove or abandon, at
      their option, any of the Debtors’ personal property that may be located on
      the Debtors’ leased premises that are subject to a rejected Contract;
      provided, however, that to the extent the Debtors seek to abandon personal
      property that contains “personally identifiable information,” as that term is
      defined in section 101(41A) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “PII”), the
      Debtors will use commercially reasonable efforts to remove the PII from
      such personal property before abandonment. The Debtors shall generally
      describe the Abandoned Property in the applicable Rejection Notice and
      their intent to abandon such property. Absent a timely objection, the
      described property shall be deemed abandoned pursuant to section 554 of
      the Bankruptcy Code, as is, effective as of the Rejection Date. After the
      Abandoned Property is deemed abandoned pursuant to section 554 of the
      Bankruptcy Code, the applicable Rejection Counterparty or counterparties
      may, in their sole discretion and without further order of this Court, utilize
      and/or dispose of such property and, to the extent applicable, the
      automatic stay is modified to allow such disposition. To the extent
      requested by Rejection Counterparty, the Debtors shall be permitted to
      abandon the Abandoned Property to such Rejection Counterparty to
      facilitate such party’s use or disposal of such Abandoned Property.

   h. Proofs of Claim. Claims arising out of the rejection of Contracts, if any,
      must be filed on or before the later of (i) the applicable deadline for filing
      proofs of claim established in these chapter 11 cases, and
      (ii) thirty (30) days after the entry of an order of the Court approving the
      rejection. If no proof of claim is timely filed, such claimant shall be
      forever barred from asserting a claim for damages arising from the
      rejection and from participating in any distributions on such a claim that
      may be made in connection with these chapter 11 cases.

   i. Removal from Schedule. The Debtors reserve the right to remove any
      Contract from the schedule to any Rejection Notice at any time prior to the
      date of entry of an order of the Court approving the rejection, and the
      Debtors will provide notice (by overnight delivery service at the notice
      address provided in the applicable Contract) of such removal to the
      relevant Rejection Counterparties.



                                 5
              Case 24-11217-BLS          Doc 250      Filed 07/11/24     Page 6 of 7




       3.      Approval of the Contract Rejection Procedures and this Order will not prevent the

Debtors from seeking to reject a Contract by separate motion.

       4.      Nothing contained in the Motion or this Order, and no action taken pursuant to the

relief requested or granted, is intended as or shall be construed or deemed to be:             (a) an

admission as to the amount, validity or priority of, or basis for any claim against the Debtors

under the Bankruptcy Code or other applicable nonbankruptcy law; (b) a waiver of the Debtors’

or any other party in interest’s right to dispute any claim on any grounds; (c) a promise or

requirement to pay any particular claim; (d) an implication, admission, or finding that any

particular claim is an administrative expense claim, other priority claim or otherwise of a type

specified or defined in the Motion or this Order; (e) an admission as to the validity, priority,

enforceability, or perfection of any lien on, security interest in, or other encumbrance on property

of the Debtors’ estates; or (f) a waiver or limitation of any claims, causes of action or other rights

of the Debtors or any other party in interest against any person or entity under the Bankruptcy

Code or any other applicable law.

       5.      Nothing in the Motion or this Order waives or modifies the requirements of the

Restructuring Support Agreement, including, without limitation, the consent and consultation

rights contained therein.

       6.      Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, any authorization

contained herein shall be subject to any interim and final orders, as applicable, approving the use

of such cash collateral and/or the Debtors’ entry into any postpetition financing facilities or

credit agreement, and any budgets in connection therewith governing any such postpetition

financing and/or use of cash collateral (each such order, a “DIP Order”). To the extent there is

any inconsistency between the terms of a DIP Order and any action taken or proposed to be

taken hereunder, the terms of the DIP Order shall control.

                                                  6
               Case 24-11217-BLS        Doc 250      Filed 07/11/24     Page 7 of 7




       7.      All rights and defenses of the Debtors are preserved, including all rights and

defenses of the Debtors with respect to a claim for damages arising as a result of a Contract

rejection, including any right to assert an offset, recoupment, counterclaim, or deduction.

In addition, nothing in this Order or the Motion shall limit the Debtors’ ability to subsequently

assert that any particular Contract is terminated and is no longer an executory contract or

unexpired lease, respectively.

       8.      Notice of the Motion as provided therein shall be deemed good and sufficient

notice of such Motion and the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) and the Local Rules are

satisfied by such notice.

       9.      Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), the terms and conditions of this Order

are immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry.

       10.     The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief

granted in this Order in accordance with the Motion.

       11.     This Court retains jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to

the implementation, interpretation, and enforcement of this Order.




Dated: July 11th, 2024                          BRENDAN L. SHANNON
Wilmington, Delaware                            UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE




                                                 7


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.deb.193283.250.0.pdf
Size
232,553 bytes
SHA-256
cd9647a2d29669c100666a34946c967055c607637c01b17d7ce6f16abdbcc6eb
Our copy
gov.uscourts.deb.193283.250.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top