Federal district · prosecutions
U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
8 pandemic-relief fraud prosecution records for the District of South Carolina, naming 8 defendants. By program: 6 PPP, 2 unemployment insurance. None has a case page in the archive. An amount is stated for 8 of them, from $180,000 to $2,800,000. Source dates run from 2023-04-17 to 2026-03-13.
Cases
8 defendants · 0 with a case page · sorted by amount, largest first
| Defendant | Case page | Program | Charge | Amount | Disposition | Sentence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Chan | PPP/EIDL | wire fraud, conspiracy | $2,800,000 total_loss | plea | 24 months | 2025-03-03 | |
| Tiffany McFadden | PPP | PPP fraud scheme | $2,000,000 obtained | sentenced | 37 months | 2023-08-17 | |
| Jonathan Wade Sumter | PPP, EIDL | wire fraud and money laundering | $1,802,741 obtained | sentenced | 80 months | 2026-03-13 | |
| Jacob Liticker | PPP | conspiracy to commit wire fraud | $1,800,000 attempted | plea | 24 months | 2024-10-02 | |
| Nariman Mahmoud Masoud | UI | conspiracy to commit wire fraud | $604,074 restitution | guilty plea | 13 months | 2023-08-09 | |
| Mohammad Ribhi Farraj | UI | conspiracy to commit wire fraud | $454,074 fraudulent UI claims (wire fraud conspiracy) | guilty plea | 5 months | 2023-05-01 | |
| Staci Harley | PPP/EIDL | wire fraud, conspiracy | $295,841 obtained | plea | 36 months | 2024-06-14 | |
| Maggie-Anne Boler | PPP/Tax | false tax returns, fraudulent Payroll Protection Plan (PPP) loan | $180,000 obtained | trial | 30 months | 2023-04-17 |
Data and method
Each row is one row of the pandemic-relief sentences table, printed as that table prints it: defendant, program, charge, amount and its basis, disposition, and the date of the source the row was read from. A blank cell is a blank cell in the table. The sentence column states the months of imprisonment the table records, or the years of probation where it records no custodial term. A case page is linked only where a case page in this district names the defendant; 0 of the 8 rows do. District is the table’s own district field, resolved to this court. Rows whose district field names only a state with more than one federal district are not placed on any district page. A date the table writes in another form is restated as YYYY-MM-DD; a cell that is not a date is printed as it stands. An amount of $1 billion or more is left out: those cells carry a program appropriation quoted in the source release, not a sum attributed to the defendant. Some defendants have more than one row because the table read them from more than one source.
Court hub: U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina — every filing in the archive from this court, with the case pages it holds.