Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Rankings Prosecutions by district D. Or.

Federal district · prosecutions

U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

6 pandemic-relief fraud prosecution records for the District of Oregon, naming 6 defendants. By program: 5 PPP, 1 EIDL. None has a case page in the archive. An amount is stated for 5 of them, from $155,000 to $11,500,000. Source dates run from 2022-02-22 to 2024-02-09.

Cases

6 defendants · 0 with a case page · sorted by amount, largest first

DefendantCase pageProgramChargeAmountDispositionSentenceDate
James Robert BakerPPP/EIDLWire fraud; aggravated identity theft$11,500,000
amount obtained
guilty plea70 months2022-2023
Michael James DeFreesPPP/EIDLwire fraud, bank fraud, money laundering$1,300,000
Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDLs) and Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans fraudulently obtained
guilty plea21 months2024-02-09
Peter Peacock BloodPPPfraudulently applying for and obtaining loans intended to help small businesses during the Covid-19 pandemic$600,000
obtained
sentenced12 months2023-05-24
David UnitanPPP, EIDLwire fraud, aggravated identity theft, money laundering$295,000
obtained
plea61 months2022-02-22
Tiairre Travonne ChaneyEIDLsupervised release violation; fraudulent EIDL applications$155,000
EIDL fraud
plea6 months2022-11-30
United States v. Andrew Aaron Lloyd (D. Oregon)PPP/EIDL48 months

Data and method

Each row is one row of the pandemic-relief sentences table, printed as that table prints it: defendant, program, charge, amount and its basis, disposition, and the date of the source the row was read from. A blank cell is a blank cell in the table. The sentence column states the months of imprisonment the table records, or the years of probation where it records no custodial term. A case page is linked only where a case page in this district names the defendant; 0 of the 6 rows do. District is the table’s own district field, resolved to this court. Rows whose district field names only a state with more than one federal district are not placed on any district page. A date the table writes in another form is restated as YYYY-MM-DD; a cell that is not a date is printed as it stands. An amount of $1 billion or more is left out: those cells carry a program appropriation quoted in the source release, not a sum attributed to the defendant. Some defendants have more than one row because the table read them from more than one source.

Court hub: U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon — every filing in the archive from this court, with the case pages it holds.

Back to top