Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Rankings Prosecutions by district W.D. Okla.

Federal district · prosecutions

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

6 pandemic-relief fraud prosecution records for the Western District of Oklahoma, naming 6 defendants. By program: 2 PPP, 2 EIDL, 2 unemployment insurance. None has a case page in the archive. An amount is stated for 6 of them, from $26,700 to $727,300. Source dates run from 2022-07-27 to 2025-06-25.

Cases

6 defendants · 0 with a case page · sorted by amount, largest first

DefendantCase pageProgramChargeAmountDispositionSentenceDate
SHERI LYNN VICKERYPPPmaking a false statement to a financial institution$727,300
PPP loan proceeds received
not specified22 months2025-06-25
Adonijah LindsayEIDLwire fraud, false statements$400,000
attempted
plea36 months2024-07-30
MADINAH MALIKAH MONTGOMERYEIDLwire fraud, conspiracy$300,000
Total amount received from three fraudulent EIDL loans
plea24 months2024-11-26
Alfred SmithUIaccess device fraud$246,607
restitution ordered
sentenced30 months2022-07-27
BRIAN LEE FOSTERPPPmaking false statements to a financial institution$40,000
obtained
plea24 months2023-09-28
Andrice SainvilUIPandemic-Related Fraud$26,700
restitution ordered
sentenced24 months2022-12-29

Data and method

Each row is one row of the pandemic-relief sentences table, printed as that table prints it: defendant, program, charge, amount and its basis, disposition, and the date of the source the row was read from. A blank cell is a blank cell in the table. The sentence column states the months of imprisonment the table records, or the years of probation where it records no custodial term. A case page is linked only where a case page in this district names the defendant; 0 of the 6 rows do. District is the table’s own district field, resolved to this court. Rows whose district field names only a state with more than one federal district are not placed on any district page. A date the table writes in another form is restated as YYYY-MM-DD; a cell that is not a date is printed as it stands. An amount of $1 billion or more is left out: those cells carry a program appropriation quoted in the source release, not a sum attributed to the defendant. Some defendants have more than one row because the table read them from more than one source.

Back to top