Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Rankings Prosecutions by district N.D.N.Y.

Federal district · prosecutions

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York

7 pandemic-relief fraud prosecution records for the Northern District of New York, naming 7 defendants. By program: 5 PPP, 2 unemployment insurance. None has a case page in the archive. An amount is stated for 7 of them, from $163,993 to $5,600,000. Source dates run from 2022-01-26 to 2024-09-20.

Cases

7 defendants · 0 with a case page · sorted by amount, largest first

DefendantCase pageProgramChargeAmountDispositionSentenceDate
Sean M. AndrePPPconspiracy to commit bank fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud$5,600,000
obtained
plea30 months2022-02-24
Jean R. LavanturePPP/EIDLconspiracy to commit bank fraud; conspiracy to commit wire fraud$4,870,781
obtained
plea60 months2022-01-26
Debra HackstadtPPP/EIDLwire fraud$1,696,324.96
fraudulently obtained 32 government-backed COVID loans (PPP+EIDL)
guilty plea16 months2022-11-08
Carl DiVegliaUIUI fraud; abusing insider access$1,600,000
restitution ordered
sentenced20 months2024-08-22
Deborah Budhraj and Adesh BudhrajPPP, EIDLbank fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy$558,514
The combined total of two Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans and one Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) fraudulently obtained by the defendants.
plea2024-05-15
William TaylorUIaggravated identity theft, wire fraud, conspiracy, false claims$381,815
obtained
sentenced36 months2024-09-20
Scott SolomonPPPtwo counts of bank fraud$163,993
obtained
guilty plea13 months2024-07-25

Data and method

Each row is one row of the pandemic-relief sentences table, printed as that table prints it: defendant, program, charge, amount and its basis, disposition, and the date of the source the row was read from. A blank cell is a blank cell in the table. The sentence column states the months of imprisonment the table records, or the years of probation where it records no custodial term. A case page is linked only where a case page in this district names the defendant; 0 of the 7 rows do. District is the table’s own district field, resolved to this court. Rows whose district field names only a state with more than one federal district are not placed on any district page. A date the table writes in another form is restated as YYYY-MM-DD; a cell that is not a date is printed as it stands. An amount of $1 billion or more is left out: those cells carry a program appropriation quoted in the source release, not a sum attributed to the defendant. Some defendants have more than one row because the table read them from more than one source.

Back to top