Federal district · prosecutions
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan
5 pandemic-relief fraud prosecution records for the Western District of Michigan, naming 5 defendants. By program: 3 PPP, 2 unemployment insurance. 1 has a case page in the archive. An amount is stated for 5 of them, from $69,051 to $1,495,067. Source dates run from 2022-03-04 to 2023-12-05.
Cases
5 defendants · 1 with a case page · sorted by amount, largest first
| Defendant | Case page | Program | Charge | Amount | Disposition | Sentence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Kurbanov | Two Men Sentenced For Paycheck Protection Program Loan Fraud | PPP | conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering | $1,495,067 PPP loan funds obtained | guilty plea | 36 months | 2022-03-04 |
| Jemar Mason | Judge Sends Cocaine Dealer To Prison For Covid-Relief Fraud | PPP | conspiracy to obtain COVID-19 relief funds | $1,400,000 sought (release: a plot to obtain more than $1.4 million in COVID-19 relief funds) | sentenced | 87 months | 2022-12-21 |
| Roshell Beaty | Roshell Beaty Sentenced To 124 Months In Prison For Over $1 Million In COVID Fraud | UI | two counts of Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud and one count of Aggravated Identity Theft | $1,036,870 amount_stolen | plea | 124 months | 2023-12-05 |
| Francisca Juarez | UI | UI fraud conspiracy | $1,000,000 restitution ordered | sentenced | 63 months | 2023-12-01 | |
| Shakayla Lorrene Tucker | United States v. Shakayla Tucker — U.S. District Court, W.D. Mich. | PPP/EIDL | $69,051 restitution ordered | 10 months |
Data and method
Each row is one row of the pandemic-relief sentences table, printed as that table prints it: defendant, program, charge, amount and its basis, disposition, and the date of the source the row was read from. A blank cell is a blank cell in the table. The sentence column states the months of imprisonment the table records, or the years of probation where it records no custodial term. A case page is linked only where a case page in this district names the defendant; 1 of the 5 rows do. District is the table’s own district field, resolved to this court. Rows whose district field names only a state with more than one federal district are not placed on any district page. A date the table writes in another form is restated as YYYY-MM-DD; a cell that is not a date is printed as it stands. An amount of $1 billion or more is left out: those cells carry a program appropriation quoted in the source release, not a sum attributed to the defendant. Some defendants have more than one row because the table read them from more than one source.
Court hub: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan — every filing in the archive from this court, with the case pages it holds.