Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Rankings Prosecutions by district D. Me.

Federal district · prosecutions

U.S. District Court for the District of Maine

7 pandemic-relief fraud prosecution records for the District of Maine, naming 7 defendants. By program: 7 PPP. 1 has a case page in the archive. An amount is stated for 7 of them, from $20,833 to $1,010,581. Source dates run from 2022-11-02 to 2026-06-12.

Cases

7 defendants · 1 with a case page · sorted by amount, largest first

DefendantCase pageProgramChargeAmountDispositionSentenceDate
Mark X. Haley IIPPPbank fraud$1,010,581
fraud proceeds received and ordered in restitution
guilty plea18 months2023-10-04
Currin CaridinePPP/EIDL mixedwire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud$475,000
EIDL and PPP loans
guilty plea41 months2026-06-12
Craig C. FranckPPP/EIDLwire fraud, money laundering$322,460
obtained
plea33 months2023-01-25
Merton Weed Jr.PPPfiling fraudulent applications for loans from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)$253,646
total PPP funds received across eight fraudulent applications
guilty plea24 months2024-05-31
Frederick AveryPPPbank fraud$215,000
loans received
plea5 months2024-12-10
Nathan ReardonPPPbank fraud$59,145
PPP loan proceeds obtained
guilty plea20 months2022-11-02
Shahied GoldenUnited States v. Shahied R. Golden — U.S. District Court, District of MainePPPfiling a fraudulent application for a loan from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)$20,833
received
guilty plea13 months2025-03-12

Data and method

Each row is one row of the pandemic-relief sentences table, printed as that table prints it: defendant, program, charge, amount and its basis, disposition, and the date of the source the row was read from. A blank cell is a blank cell in the table. The sentence column states the months of imprisonment the table records, or the years of probation where it records no custodial term. A case page is linked only where a case page in this district names the defendant; 1 of the 7 rows do. District is the table’s own district field, resolved to this court. Rows whose district field names only a state with more than one federal district are not placed on any district page. A date the table writes in another form is restated as YYYY-MM-DD; a cell that is not a date is printed as it stands. An amount of $1 billion or more is left out: those cells carry a program appropriation quoted in the source release, not a sum attributed to the defendant. Some defendants have more than one row because the table read them from more than one source.

Court hub: U.S. District Court for the District of Maine — every filing in the archive from this court, with the case pages it holds.

Back to top