Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Rankings Prosecutions by district S.D. Ind.

Federal district · prosecutions

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

4 pandemic-relief fraud prosecution records for the Southern District of Indiana, naming 4 defendants. By program: 4 unemployment insurance. None has a case page in the archive. An amount is stated for 4 of them, from $95,000 to $5,475,459. Source dates run from 2021-10-28 to 2025-08-01.

Cases

4 defendants · 0 with a case page · sorted by amount, largest first

DefendantCase pageProgramChargeAmountDispositionSentenceDate
Oluwatobi SetonUIwire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and conspiracy to commit money laundering$5,475,459
attempted
plea66 months2023-08-11
Temitope S. AdeboyeUIwire fraud, aggravated identity theft, identity theft$804,460.54
(DOJ release)
sentenced57 months2023-12-29
Johnson OmodusonuUI/PUAConspiracy to commit access device fraud; Access device fraud$520,000
actual
guilty plea24 months2025-08-01
Andrea Renee PytlinskiUIwire fraud$95,000
unemployment insurance programs
not specified18 months2021-10-28

Data and method

Each row is one row of the pandemic-relief sentences table, printed as that table prints it: defendant, program, charge, amount and its basis, disposition, and the date of the source the row was read from. A blank cell is a blank cell in the table. The sentence column states the months of imprisonment the table records, or the years of probation where it records no custodial term. A case page is linked only where a case page in this district names the defendant; 0 of the 4 rows do. District is the table’s own district field, resolved to this court. Rows whose district field names only a state with more than one federal district are not placed on any district page. A date the table writes in another form is restated as YYYY-MM-DD; a cell that is not a date is printed as it stands. An amount of $1 billion or more is left out: those cells carry a program appropriation quoted in the source release, not a sum attributed to the defendant. Some defendants have more than one row because the table read them from more than one source.

Back to top