Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Rankings Prosecutions by district D.D.C.

Federal district · prosecutions

U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

7 pandemic-relief fraud prosecution records for the District of Columbia, naming 7 defendants. By program: 4 PPP, 1 EIDL, 2 other or unclassified. 1 has a case page in the archive. An amount is stated for 7 of them, from $50,000 to $2,538,000. Source dates run from 2020-11-12 to 2025-12-19.

Cases

7 defendants · 1 with a case page · sorted by amount, largest first

DefendantCase pageProgramChargeAmountDispositionSentenceDate
Kenneth GaughanPPP/EIDLone count of wire fraud and one count of money laundering in the PPP and EIDL case, and one count of wire fraud in the case involving the Archdiocese$2,538,000
(DOJ release)
sentenced78 months2022-09-02
Elias EldabbaghUnited States v. Elias Eldabbagh — U.S. District Court, D.D.C.PPP/EIDLwire fraud and laundering the proceeds of the wire fraud scheme$2,452,050
restitution ordered
guilty plea120 months2022-09-20
Jennifer MayEIDLone count of wire fraud$1,500,000
defrauded
guilty plea13 months2025-12-10
Patrick StraussPPPconspiracy to commit bank fraud$304,900
loan proceeds received
plea4 years probation2025-02-04
Craven Randall CasperPPE/Tax/Class Actionmail fraud, wire fraud$235,807.11
obtained
plea36 months2020-11-12
Teron Deandre McNeilPPP, UIconspiracy to distribute 400 grams or more of fentanyl; two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud$65,220
proceeds received
plea120 months2025-12-19
Nicole Nikisha BranchSBA theftTrafficking in stolen property$50,000
restitution ordered
guilty plea12 months2023-2024

Data and method

Each row is one row of the pandemic-relief sentences table, printed as that table prints it: defendant, program, charge, amount and its basis, disposition, and the date of the source the row was read from. A blank cell is a blank cell in the table. The sentence column states the months of imprisonment the table records, or the years of probation where it records no custodial term. A case page is linked only where a case page in this district names the defendant; 1 of the 7 rows do. District is the table’s own district field, resolved to this court. Rows whose district field names only a state with more than one federal district are not placed on any district page. A date the table writes in another form is restated as YYYY-MM-DD; a cell that is not a date is printed as it stands. An amount of $1 billion or more is left out: those cells carry a program appropriation quoted in the source release, not a sum attributed to the defendant. Some defendants have more than one row because the table read them from more than one source.

Court hub: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia — every filing in the archive from this court, with the case pages it holds.

Back to top