Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Wilson v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Proposed Final Order & Judgment Approving Settlement — In re Peloton Securities Litigation

Court filing

Proposed Final Order & Judgment Approving Settlement — In re Peloton Securities Litigation

Filed April 24, 2024 in Wilson v. Peloton; one of 10 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
Filed2024-04-24

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · No. 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK · Doc. 93-1 · 2024-04-24 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
 
IN RE PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC. 
SECURITIES LITIGATION 
Case No. 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK 
 
[PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER AND 
JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS 
ACTION SETTLEMENT 
 
 
 
Case 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK     Document 93-1     Filed 04/24/24     Page 1 of 9 PageID #:
1734

 
1 
WHEREAS: 
A. 
The above-captioned action is pending in this Court, and on April 17, 2023, Lead 
Plaintiff Richard Neswick (“Lead Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of each member of the 
Settlement Class and Defendants Peloton Interactive, Inc. (“Peloton”), and John Foley, Jill 
Woodworth, Hisao Kushi, and Brad Olson, with Peloton, the “Defendants,” and collectively with 
Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), have entered into the Stipulation of Settlement that provides for a 
complete dismissal with prejudice of the claims asserted against Defendants in the Action on the 
terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation, subject to approval of this Court (the 
“Settlement”); 
B. 
Pursuant to the Decision and Order, entered February 21, 2024 (the “Preliminary 
Approval Order”), the Court scheduled a hearing for June 20, 2024, to, among other things: (i) 
determine whether the proposed Settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided 
for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and should be approved by the Court; (ii) 
determine whether a judgment as provided for in the Stipulation should be entered; and (iii) rule 
on Lead Counsel’s Fee and Expense Application; 
C. 
The Court ordered that the Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and Proposed 
Settlement; (II) Settlement Hearing; and (III) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Litigation 
Expenses (“Notice”) and Proof of Claim and Release Form (“Claim Form”), substantially in the 
forms attached to the Preliminary Approval Order as Exhibits A-1 and A-3, be posted on the 
settlement website www.PelotonSecuritiesSettlement.com on or before twenty-one (21) calendar 
days after the date of entry of the Preliminary Approval Order (“Notice Date”), that the Postcard 
Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement; (II) Settlement Hearing; and 
(III) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Litigation Expenses (the “Postcard Notice”), substantially 
in the form attached to the Preliminary Approval Order as Exhibit A-2, be mailed by first-class 
mail, postage prepaid, on or before the Notice Date to all potential Settlement Class Members to 
the list of record holders of Peloton securities, and that a Summary Notice of (I) Pendency of 
Class Action and Proposed Settlement; (II) Settlement Hearing; and (III) Motion for Attorneys’ 
Case 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK     Document 93-1     Filed 04/24/24     Page 2 of 9 PageID #:
1735

 
2 
Fees and Litigation Expenses (the “Summary Notice”), substantially in the form attached to the 
Preliminary Approval Order as Exhibit A-4, be published in Investor’s Business Daily and 
transmitted over GlobeNewswire within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Notice Date; 
D. 
The Notice, Postcard Notice, and Summary Notice advised potential Settlement 
Class Members of the date, time, place, and purpose of the Settlement Hearing.  The Notice 
further advised that any objections to the Settlement were required to be filed with the Court and 
served on counsel for the Parties such that they were received by May 30, 2024; 
E. 
The provisions of the Preliminary Approval Order as to notice were complied 
with; 
F. 
On April 24, 2024, Lead Plaintiff moved for final approval of the Settlement, as 
set forth in the Preliminary Approval Order.  The Settlement Hearing was duly held before this 
Court on June 20, 2024, at which time all interested Persons were afforded the opportunity to be 
heard; and 
G. 
This Court has duly considered Lead Plaintiff’s motion for final approval of the 
Settlement, the affidavits, declarations, memoranda of law submitted in support thereof, the 
Stipulation, and all of the submissions and arguments presented with respect to the proposed 
Settlement; 
NOW, THEREFORE, after due deliberation, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND 
DECREED that: 
1. 
This Judgment incorporates and makes a part hereof: (i) the Stipulation filed with 
the Court on April 17, 2023; and (ii) the Notice, which was filed with the Court on April 24, 
2024.  Capitalized terms not defined in this Judgment shall have the meaning set forth in the 
Stipulation. 
2. 
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over all 
Parties to the Action, including all Settlement Class Members. 
3. 
The Court hereby certifies, for the purposes of the Settlement only, the Action as 
a class action pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf 
Case 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK     Document 93-1     Filed 04/24/24     Page 3 of 9 PageID #:
1736

 
3 
of the Settlement Class.  Excluded from the Settlement Class are (i) Defendants; (ii) current and 
former officers and directors of Peloton, (iii) members of the immediate family of each of the 
Individual Defendants, (iv) all subsidiaries and affiliates of Peloton and the directors and officers 
of Peloton and their respective subsidiaries or affiliates, (v) all persons, firms, trusts, 
corporations, officers, directors, and any other individual or entity in which any Defendant has a 
controlling interest, (vi) the legal representatives, agents, affiliates, heirs, successors in interest or 
assigns of all such excluded parties, and (vii) any persons or entities who properly excluded 
themselves by filing a valid and timely request for exclusion. 
4. 
The Court finds that that the mailing and publication of the Postcard Notice, 
Notice, Claim Form, and Summary Notice: (i) complied with the Preliminary Approval Order; 
(ii) constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances; (iii) constituted notice that 
was reasonably calculated to apprise Settlement Class Members of the effect of the Settlement, 
of the proposed Plan of Allocation, of Lead Counsel’s anticipated Fee and Expense Application, 
of Settlement Class Members’ right to object or seek exclusion from the Settlement Class, and of 
their right to appear at the Settlement Hearing; (iv) constituted due, adequate, and sufficient 
notice to all Persons entitled to receive notice of the proposed Settlement; and (v) satisfied the 
notice requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States 
Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform 
Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(7). 
5. 
The Court finds that the notice requirements set forth in the Class Action Fairness 
Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C. § 1715, to the extent applicable to the Action, have been satisfied.  
6. 
[Description of number and nature of any objections to the proposed Settlement.  
The Court has considered each of the objections to the Settlement submitted pursuant to Rule 
23(e)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  The Court finds and concludes that each of the 
objections is hereby overruled.] 
7. 
Pursuant to Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court 
hereby approves the Settlement and finds that in light of the benefits to the Settlement Class, the 
Case 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK     Document 93-1     Filed 04/24/24     Page 4 of 9 PageID #:
1737

 
4 
complexity and expense of further litigation, and the costs of continued litigation, said 
Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate, having considered and found that: 
(a) Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel have adequately represented the Settlement Class; (b) the 
proposal was negotiated at arm’s-length; (c) the relief provided for the Settlement Class is 
adequate, having taken into account (i) the costs, risks, and delay of trial and appeal; (ii) the 
effectiveness of any proposed method of distributing relief to the Settlement Class, including the 
method of processing Settlement Class Member claims; (iii) the terms of any proposed award of 
attorneys’ fees, including timing of payment; and (iv) any agreement required to be identified 
under Rule 23(e)(3); and (d) the proposed Plan of Allocation treats Settlement Class Members 
equitably relative to each other.  Accordingly, the Settlement is hereby approved in all respects 
and shall be consummated in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Stipulation. 
8. 
The Amended Class Action Complaint (“AC”), filed on January 21, 2022, is 
dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, and without costs to any Party, except as otherwise 
provided in the Stipulation. 
9. 
The Court finds that during the course of the Action, the Parties and their 
respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure. 
10. 
Upon the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiff and each and every other Settlement Class 
Member, on behalf of themselves and each of their respective heirs, executors, trustees, 
administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, in their capacities as such, shall be deemed 
to have fully, finally, and forever waived, released, discharged, and dismissed each and every 
one of the Released Claims against each and every one of the Releasees and shall forever be 
barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, prosecuting, or maintaining any and all of the 
Released Claims against any and all of the Releasees. 
11. 
Upon the Effective Date, Defendants, on behalf of themselves and each of their 
respective heirs, executors, trustees, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, in 
their capacities as such, shall be deemed to have fully, finally, and forever waived, released, 
Case 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK     Document 93-1     Filed 04/24/24     Page 5 of 9 PageID #:
1738

 
5 
discharged, and dismissed each and every one of the Released Claims against each and every one 
of the Releasees and shall forever be barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, 
prosecuting, or maintaining any and all of the Released Claims against any and all of the 
Releasees. 
12. 
Each Settlement Class Member, whether or not such Settlement Class Member 
executes and delivers a Claim Form, is bound by this Judgment, including, without limitation, 
the release of claims as set forth in the Stipulation. 
13. 
This Judgment and the Stipulation, whether or not consummated, and any 
discussion, negotiation, proceeding, or agreement relating to the Stipulation, the Settlement, and 
any matter arising in connection with settlement discussions or negotiations, proceedings, or 
agreements, shall not be offered or received against or to the prejudice of the Parties or their 
respective counsel, for any purpose other than in an action to enforce the terms hereof, and in 
particular: 
a. 
Do not constitute, and shall not be offered or received against or to the 
prejudice of Defendants as evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be evidence of any 
presumption, concession, or admission by Defendants with respect to the truth of any allegation 
by the Lead Plaintiff and the Settlement Class, or the validity of any claim that has been or could 
have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, including but not limited to the Released 
Claims, or of any liability, damages, negligence, fault or wrongdoing of Defendants or any 
person or entity whatsoever; 
b. 
Do not constitute, and shall not be offered or received against or to the 
prejudice of Defendants as evidence of a presumption, concession, or admission of any fault, 
misrepresentation, or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved or 
made by Defendants, or against or to the prejudice of Lead Plaintiff, or any other member of the 
Settlement Class as evidence of any infirmity in the claims of Lead Plaintiff, or the other 
members of the Settlement Class; 
Case 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK     Document 93-1     Filed 04/24/24     Page 6 of 9 PageID #:
1739

 
6 
c. 
Do not constitute, and shall not be offered or received against or to the 
prejudice of Defendants, Lead Plaintiff, any other member of the Settlement Class, or their 
respective counsel, as evidence of a presumption, concession, or admission with respect to any 
liability, damages, negligence, fault, infirmity, or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any 
other reason against or to the prejudice of any of the Defendants, Lead Plaintiff, other members 
of the Settlement Class, or their respective counsel, in any other civil, criminal, or administrative 
action or proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the 
provisions of the Stipulation; 
d. 
Do not constitute, and shall not be construed against Defendants, Lead 
Plaintiff, or any other member of the Settlement Class, as an admission or concession that the 
consideration to be given hereunder represents the amount that could be or would have been 
recovered after trial; and 
e. 
Do not constitute, and shall not be construed as or received in evidence as 
an admission, concession, or presumption against Lead Plaintiff, or any other member of the 
Settlement Class that any of their claims are without merit or infirm or that damages recoverable 
under the AC would not have exceeded the Settlement Amount.  Within sixty (60) days of the 
entry of this Judgment, Lead Plaintiff shall return or certify the deletion of all discovery 
documents produced by Defendants and Defendants shall return or certify the deletion of all 
discovery documents produced by Lead Plaintiff. 
14. 
The administration of the Settlement, and the decision of all disputed questions of 
law and fact with respect to the validity of any claim or right of any Person to participate in the 
distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, shall remain under the authority of this Court. 
15. 
In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance with the 
terms of the Stipulation, then this Judgment shall be rendered null and void to the extent 
provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated, and in such event, all 
orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void to the extent 
provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation. 
Case 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK     Document 93-1     Filed 04/24/24     Page 7 of 9 PageID #:
1740

 
7 
16. 
Without further order of the Court, the Parties may agree to reasonable extensions 
of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Stipulation. 
17. 
The Parties are hereby directed to execute the Stipulation and to perform its terms. 
18. 
The Court hereby finds that the proposed Plan of Allocation is a fair and 
reasonable method to allocate the Settlement Fund among Settlement Class Members, and Lead 
Counsel and the Claims Administrator are directed to administer the Plan of Allocation in 
accordance with its terms and the terms of the Stipulation. 
19. 
Lead Counsel is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $______________, and 
expenses in the amount of $______________, plus any applicable interest, and these amounts 
shall be paid of the of the Settlement Fund immediately following entry of this Order subject to 
the terms, conditions, and obligations of the Stipulation, which terms, conditions, and obligations 
are incorporated herein. 
20. 
Lead Plaintiff is awarded in total $_____________________, as an award for 
reasonable costs and expenses directly relating to the representation of the Settlement Class as 
provided in 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(4), such amounts to be paid from the Settlement Fund upon the 
Effective Date of the Settlement. 
21. 
Without further approval from the Court, Lead Plaintiff and Defendants are 
hereby authorized to agree to and adopt such amendments or modifications of the Stipulation or 
any exhibits attached thereto to effectuate the Settlement that: (a) are not materially inconsistent 
with this Judgment; and (b) do not materially limit the rights of the Settlement Class Members in 
connection with the Settlement.  Without further order of the Court, Lead Plaintiff and 
Defendants may reasonably agree to extensions of time to carry out any provisions of the 
Settlement.  
22. 
Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court hereby 
retains continuing jurisdiction over: (i) implementation of the Settlement; (ii) the allowance, 
disallowance or adjustment of any Settlement Class Member’s claim on equitable grounds and 
any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund; (iii) disposition of the Settlement Fund; (iv) 
Case 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK     Document 93-1     Filed 04/24/24     Page 8 of 9 PageID #:
1741

 
8 
any applications for attorneys’ fees, costs, interest and payment of expenses in the Action; (v) all 
Parties for the purpose of construing, enforcing and administering the Settlement and this 
Judgment; and (vi) other matters related or ancillary to the foregoing.  There is no just reason for 
delay in the entry of this Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is expressly 
directed. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
DATED: _____________ 
 
 
______________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE HONORABLE PEGGY KUO 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
 
 
Case 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK     Document 93-1     Filed 04/24/24     Page 9 of 9 PageID #:
1742

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nyed.463443.93.1.pdf
Size
193,844 bytes
SHA-256
70bd178f647a3d96d36469263b99616eebe7c515a4986b50540af1c360d0adba
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nyed.463443.93.1.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top