Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings U.S. v. Shibley Wawd Final Order of Forfeiture — U.S. v. Shibley

Court filing

Final Order of Forfeiture — U.S. v. Shibley

Filed September 30, 2022 in U.S. v. Shibley; one of 10 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington (Seattle)
Filed2022-09-30

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington (Seattle) · No. 2:20-cr-00174-JCC · Doc. 183 · 2022-09-30 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Final Order of Forfeiture - 1 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
The Hon. John C. Coughenour 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 
AT SEATTLE 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
ERIC SHIBLEY, 
 
       Defendant. 
 
No. CR20-174-JCC 
 
[PROPOSED] 
 
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE  
 
 
 
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion for a Final 
Order of Forfeiture for the following property (collectively, the “Subject Property”): 
1. $49,500.86 in U.S. funds, seized on or about May 29, 2020, from Navy Federal 
Credit Union account #******7528, held in the name of Eric R. Shibley MD PLLC;  
2. $100,000.00 in U.S. funds, seized on or about May 29, 2020, from Wells 
Fargo account #******2378, held in the name of ES1 LLC; 
3. $804,816.63 in U.S. funds, seized on or about May 27, 2020, from Wells  
Fargo account #******3536, held in the name of The A Team Holdings LLC; 
4. $114,440.00 in U.S. funds, seized on or about June 30, 2020, from Verity  
Credit Union account #***5390, held in the name of Dituri Construction LLC; and 
5. $114,743.59 in U.S. funds, seized on or about June 30, 2020, from Verity  
Credit Union account #***5320, held in the name of SS1 LLC. 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC   Document 183   Filed 09/30/22   Page 1 of 5

 
 
 
 
Final Order of Forfeiture - 2 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
The Court, having reviewed the United States’ motion, as well as the other  
pleadings and papers filed in this matter, HEREBY FINDS that entry of a Final Order of  
Forfeiture is appropriate for the following reasons:  
1. On November 18, 2021, Defendant Shibley was convicted of Wire Fraud, in  
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2; Bank Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.  
§§ 1344(2) and 2; and Money Laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 
1957 and 2. The evidence at trial established that the Subject Property was  
forfeitable, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), by way of 28 U.S.C.  
§ 2461(c), and 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1) – (2), as property that constitutes or is  
traceable to proceeds of the Wire Fraud and Bank Fraud schemes or 
property that was involved in the Money Laundering offenses. Dkt. Nos. 
140, 144. 
2. On December 17, 2021, the United States filed its Motion for Entry of a  
Combined Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and Order of Forfeiture (the  
“Combined Motion”). Dkt. No. 140. In the Combined Motion, the  
United States moved for a preliminary order of forfeiture as to the Subject  
Property, and a final order of forfeiture as to a sum of money in the amount 
of $254,199, reflecting the unrecovered proceeds of Defendant’s fraud 
schemes. Id. One of the entities that Defendant used to submit false and 
fraudulent PPP and EIDL applications as part of his scheme to defraud 
COVID-19 relief programs — ES1 LLC — attempted to intervene in the 
criminal case regarding the $100,000, discussed above; the United States 
opposed ES1 LLC’s attempt. Dkt. Nos. 142 - 143. 
3. On January 21, 2022, the Court granted the Combined Motion and entered an  
Order (the “Order”), finding the Subject Property forfeitable pursuant to 18  
U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), by way of 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and 18 U.S.C. 
§ 982(a)(1) – (2), and forfeiting the Defendant’s interest in it. Dkt. No. 144. 
The Court overruled ES1 LLC’s objection to the preliminary forfeiture of 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC   Document 183   Filed 09/30/22   Page 2 of 5

 
 
 
 
Final Order of Forfeiture - 3 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
the $100,000. Id. The Court also granted the United States’ request for the 
forfeiture of a sum of money reflecting the unrecovered proceeds of the 
Defendant’s fraud schemes. Id. The forfeiture of the sum of money is 
personal to the Defendant and is not at issue in the United States’ Motion 
for Final Order of Forfeiture of the above-identified property. Id.  
4. On March 8, 2022, the Court sentenced Defendant to 48-months of  
imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release. Dkt. 
Nos. 151 – 152, 150. The Court ordered Defendant to pay restitution of 
$1,438,000.00 to his victims and ordered the forfeiture of Defendant’s 
interest in the Subject Property and the sum of money, as previously held in 
the Order. Dkt. Nos. 152, 159.  
5. The Defendant appealed his conviction and sentence to the Ninth Circuit Court  
of Appeals. Dkt. No 155. 
6. On June 10, 2022, Defendant filed a Motion for Clarification of Restitution  
Credit for Forfeited Funds or for Indicative Ruling, requesting the Court 
authorize credit against his restitution order for forfeited property (the 
“Motion”). Dkt. No. 170. After considering the opposition of the United 
States and the Defendant’s Reply, Dkt. Nos. 173 – 174, the Court held that 
it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the Motion due to the Defendant’s 
pending appeal of his conviction and sentence. Dkt. No. 175. The Court 
also issued an indicative ruling that if the Ninth Circuit were to remand the 
matter to the Court, then the Court would deny the Motion to credit the 
forfeited funds toward the restitution order. Id. The Defendant also 
appealed this Order. Dkt. No. 176. 
7. The United States published notice of the pending forfeiture, as instructed by  
the Court and required by 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1) and Federal Rule of 
Criminal Procedure (“Fed. R. Crim. P.”) 32.2(b)(6)(C). Dkt. No. 147. The 
United States also sent notice of the pending forfeiture directly to six 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC   Document 183   Filed 09/30/22   Page 3 of 5

 
 
 
 
Final Order of Forfeiture - 4 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
John C. Coughenour 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
identified potential claimants – one individual and five businesses 
associated with Defendant – at their last known addresses and, where 
applicable, by sending notice to counsel. Declaration of Assistant U.S. 
Attorney Krista K. Bush in Support of Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture, 
¶ 2, Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, & F;  
8. The time for filing third-party petitions has expired and none were filed;  
9. Neither the Defendant nor the United States have sought to stay enforcement of  
the sentence.  
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COURT ORDERS:  
1.  
No right, title, or interest in the Subject Property exists in any party other 
than the United States;  
2. 
The Subject Property is fully and finally condemned and forfeited, in its 
entirety, to the United States; and  
3. 
The United States Department of Justice, and/or their representatives, are 
authorized to dispose of the Subject Property in accordance with the law. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
DATED this 30th day of September 2022. 
A 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC   Document 183   Filed 09/30/22   Page 4 of 5

 
 
 
 
Final Order of Forfeiture - 5 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
Presented by: 
 
s/Krista K. Bush 
 
 
 
KRISTA K. BUSH 
Assistant United States Attorney 
United States Attorney’s Office 
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 
Seattle, WA 98101 
(206) 553-2242 
Krista.Bush@usdoj.gov  
 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC   Document 183   Filed 09/30/22   Page 5 of 5

File and source

File
United_States_v._Shibley__wawd_2-20-cr-00174__doc183__gov.uscourts.wawd.290911.183.0.pdf
Size
190,952 bytes
SHA-256
7f354545f354801ee2798de63cd8e32b471c705d5e8122567dd239135391842f
Our copy
United_States_v._Shibley__wawd_2-20-cr-00174__doc183__gov.uscourts.wawd.290911.183.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top