Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings U.S. v. Sean Patrick Boyd Jr

Case docket

United States v. Sean Patrick Boyd, Jr. — S.D. W. Va., No. 2:23-cr-00123

United States v. Sean Patrick Boyd, Jr. — S.D. W. Va., No. 2:23-cr-00123 — 7 documents in the archive, dated August 1, 2023 to February 22, 2024.

Case facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Docket numberNo. 2:23-cr-00123 — main docket · CourtListener docket 237310
Filings7 public filings
Filed2023-08-01 – 2024-02-22
Original PDFs7 of 7

Case summary

Sean Patrick Boyd Jr. was charged in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia with receiving stolen money. The indictment, filed August 1, 2023, alleged that he received Paycheck Protection Program loan proceeds he knew had been obtained through a fraudulent scheme. In the stipulation of facts attached to his plea agreement, Boyd agreed that on or about April 18, 2021 he sent his personal and banking information to a third party. That person submitted a PPP application on his behalf that falsely claimed $99,996.00 in 2019 gross income for “Sean Boyd,” a fictitious business. A Nebraska lender sent $20,832.00 to his bank account on or about May 24, 2021. He withdrew $10,000 that day; three days earlier the account had held $12.47. He pleaded guilty, and on February 21, 2024 the court sentenced him to five years of probation and $23,817.79 in restitution to the Small Business Administration.

Case at a glance

Defendant(s)Sean Patrick Boyd, Jr.
Court and docketU.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, No. 2:23-cr-00123
ProgramPaycheck Protection Program (PPP)
ChargesReceipt of stolen money, 18 U.S.C. § 2315, one count; the indictment also sought forfeiture of $20,832
Outcome and sentencePleaded guilty to the single-count indictment; sentenced February 21, 2024 to five years of probation, $23,817.79 in restitution to the Small Business Administration and a $100 assessment; judgment filed February 22, 2024

Forfeited money covered $6,590 of the restitution

An order of January 23, 2024 granted joint motions to apply about $6,590.00 from an administrative forfeiture to restitution and to hold it in the court registry. The judgment applies that sum and leaves $17,227.79 due, payable at not less than $100 a month.

Restitution is $2,985.79 more than the loan

Boyd agreed in the plea agreement to owe $23,817.79. His sentencing memorandum says that amount includes a processing fee and interest.

Both sides pointed to a range of zero to six months

The defense memorandum cites an advisory guideline range of zero to six months and asks for probation. The government asked for a sentence within the guidelines range, which it put at 0 to 6 months of imprisonment.

Docket

7 documents in docket-entry order; attachments follow their entry. Gaps name the entries we do not have.

No. 2:23-cr-00123

  1. IndictmentEntry 1
  2. —Entries 2–12 are not in the archive
  3. Notice of Appearance of Assigned Counsel (Doc. 13, filed 2023-09-05)Entry 13
  4. —Entries 14–36 are not in the archive
  5. Plea Agreement & Stipulation of FactsEntry 37
  6. —Entries 38–42 are not in the archive
  7. Order Granting Forfeiture-to-Restitution MotionsEntry 43
  8. Defendant's Sentencing MemorandumEntry 44
  9. Government's Sentencing MemorandumEntry 45
  10. —Entry 46 is not in the archive
  11. JudgmentEntry 47

Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.

Back to top