Order of Forfeiture (Money Judgment) — United States v. Chynna Savath (D. Mass.)

Summary

The Order of Forfeiture (Money Judgment) against Chynna Savath, Case 1:21-cr-10269-RGS, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, filed June 23, 2022 as Document 28 and naming Richard G. Stearns, United States District Judge. It recites the September 13, 2021 two-count Information charging wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and the January 20, 2022 guilty plea under a plea agreement signed on September 8, 2021, in which the defendant agreed to forfeit $29,646. It states that the government later learned of additional proceeds and that the defendant agrees the proceeds equal $34,391. The court orders a personal money judgment of $34,391 under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C § 2461(c), to be included in the sentence and criminal judgment.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

1 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
) 
) 
   v. 
) 
Criminal No. 21-CR-10269 
) 
CHYNNA SAVATH  
 
 
) 
 
) 
 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
 
) 
 
ORDER OF FORFEITURE (MONEY JUDGMENT) 
 
STEARNS, D.J.   
WHEREAS, on September 13, 2021, the United States Attorney for the District of 
Massachusetts filed a two-count Information charging defendant Chynna Savath (the 
“Defendant”) with Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Counts One and Two);  
WHEREAS, the Information also included a Forfeiture Allegation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 
§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), which provided notice that the United States intended to 
seek the forfeiture, upon conviction of the Defendant of one or more of the offenses alleged in 
Counts One and Two, of any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from 
proceeds traceable to the offenses. The property to be forfeited included, but was not limited to, 
the following: 
(a) 
$29,646, to be entered in the form of an Order of Forfeiture (Money Judgment); 
 
WHEREAS, the Information further provided that, if any of the above-described forfeitable 
property, as a result of any act or omission by the Defendant, (a) cannot be located upon the 
exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) 
has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; (d) has been substantially diminished in 
Case 1:21-cr-10269-RGS     Document 28     Filed 06/23/22     Page 1 of 3

 
 
2 
value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty, 
the United States is entitled to seek forfeiture of any other property of the Defendant, up to the 
value of such assets, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C § 2461(c); 
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2022, the Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to 
a two-count Information charging Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Counts One and 
Two), pursuant to an updated, written plea agreement the Defendant signed on September 8, 
2021; 
WHEREAS, in Section 7 of the plea agreement, the Defendant agreed to forfeit to the 
United States $29,646 in United States currency on the grounds that such amount equals the 
proceeds the Defendant obtained as a result of the offense to which she pled guilty; 
WHEREAS, since the initial plea agreement was signed, the government has learned of 
additional proceeds the Defendant obtained as a result of the scheme to defraud, and the 
Defendant agrees that the amount of proceeds the Defendant obtained is equal to $34,391;  
WHEREAS, based on the Defendant’s admissions in the written plea agreement and her 
guilty plea, the United States is entitled to an Order of Forfeiture consisting of a personal money 
judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $34,391 in United States currency, pursuant to 
18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C § 2461(c);  
WHEREAS, the $34,391 in United States currency constitutes proceeds that the 
Defendant obtained as a result of violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; and 
WHEREAS, Rule 32.2(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that 
Ano ancillary proceeding is required to the extent that the forfeiture consists of a money 
judgment.” 
Case 1:21-cr-10269-RGS     Document 28     Filed 06/23/22     Page 2 of 3

 
 
3 
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: 
1. 
The Defendant shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $34,391 in United 
States currency, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C § 2461(c).  
2.  
This Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of enforcing this 
Order. 
3.  
The United States may, at any time, move pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) of the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure to amend this Order to substitute property having a value not to 
exceed the amount set forth in Paragraph 1 to satisfy the money judgment in whole or in part. 
4. The United States may conduct, pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of 
Criminal Procedure and 21 U.S.C. § 853(m), incorporated by 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), any discovery 
to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property or substitute assets, including, but not limited 
to, depositions and requests for documents, electronically stored information, and tangible 
things. 
5. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4), this Order shall be included in the sentence pronounced 
and imposed by the Court at the sentencing hearing, and in the criminal judgment entered by this 
Court against the Defendant. 
 
 
                                                        
RICHARD G. STEARNS  
United States District Judge 
 
Dated:                                 
Case 1:21-cr-10269-RGS     Document 28     Filed 06/23/22     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.mad.237962.28.0.pdf

Size

133,221 bytes

SHA-256

9d9be16887b064a1849355a6346f1418c454232bc9ad921904e1e92669107f34

Our copy

gov.uscourts.mad.237962.28.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)