Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Nekita Donyae Hooks case — U.S. District Court, E.D.N.C. Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Hooks (Dkt. 19, E.D.N.C.)

Court filing

Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Hooks (Dkt. 19, E.D.N.C.)

Summary

A consent preliminary order of forfeiture in United States v. Nekita Donyae Hooks, Case 5:23-cr-00025-D, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Western Division, filed March 31, 2023 as Document 19. It recites that the defendant pleaded guilty under a written plea agreement to Count One of the criminal information, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and agrees that the defendant personally obtained at least $145,832.50 in proceeds and made them unavailable. It enters a forfeiture money judgment of $145,832.50, the gross proceeds personally obtained by the defendant.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed March 31, 2023 in Nekita Donyae Hooks; one of 2 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Filed2023-03-31

Cite this document

“Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Hooks (Dkt. 19, E.D.N.C.).” U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, No. 5:23-cr-00025, Doc. 19, filed 2023-03-31. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-nekita-donyae-hooks/2023-03-31-consent-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture-dkt-19/, SHA-256 269d80b2233ad7ae7aa8992a8ff5423fc10496f0b673560a95f3619523f175bb.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

0                                   0
                  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
              FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
                           WESTERN DIVISION

                                NO. 5 =2 3-G(2 .. 1. 5

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                    v.                              CONSENT PRELIMINARY
                                                    ORDER OF FORFEITURE
 NEKITA DONYAE HOOKS



       WHEREAS, the above-named defendant has pleaded guilty pursuant to a

written plea agreement to Count(s) One of the Criminal Information, charging the

defendant with offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349;

      AND WHEREAS, the defendant consents to the terms of this Order and to the

forfeiture of the property that is the subject of this Order of Forfeiture; and stipulates

and agrees that he/she personally obtained at least $145,832.50 in proceeds from the

offense, and further agrees that he/she made the proceeds unavailable as a result of

his/her acts or omissions and one or more of the conditions to forfeit substitute assets

exists, as set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 853(p);

      AND WHEREAS, the defendant stipulates and agrees that the defendant

individually, or in combination with one or more co-defendants, has or had an

ownership, beneficial, possessory, or other legal interest in and/or exercised dominion

and control over each item of property that is subject to forfeiture herein;

      AND WHEREAS, the defendant knowingly and expressly agrees to waive the

requirements of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ll(b)(l)(J), 32.2(a), 32.2(b)(l),

                                              1

        Case 5:23-cr-00025-D      Document 19      Filed 03/31/23    Page 1 of 4

                       0                                    0
32.2(b)(4), and 43(a), including waiver of any defect respecting notice of the forfeiture

in the charging instrument or the plea colloquy; waiver of the right to a hearing to

present additional evidence respecting the forfeitability of any specific property or the

amount of any forfeiture money judgment; waiver of the right to be present during

any judicial proceeding respecting the forfeiture of the property that is the subject of

this Order of Forfeiture or to receive further notice of the same; waiver of any defect

respecting.the announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing; and waiver of any defect

respecting the inclusion of the forfeiture in the Court's judgment;

       AND WHEREAS, the defendant knowingly and expressly agrees that the

provisions of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture are intended to, and shall,

survive the defendant's death, notwithstanding the abatement of any underlying

criminal conviction after the entry of this Order; and that the forfeitability of any

particular property identified herein shall be determined as if defendant had

survived, and that determination shall be binding upon defendant's heirs, successors

and assigns until the agreed forfeiture, including any agreed money judgment

amount, is collected in full;

       NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the Plea Agreement, the stipulations of the

parties, and all of the evidence of record in this case, the Court FINDS as fact and

CONCLUDES as a matter oflaw that there is a nexus between each item of property

listed below and the offense(s) to which the defendant has pleaded guilty, and that

the defendant (or any combination of defendants in this case) has or had an interest

in the property to be forfeited,


                                           2

        Case 5:23-cr-00025-D       Document 19    Filed 03/31/23    Page 2 of 4

                      0                                    0
      IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

      1.     The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to Fed.

R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(l)(C):

             Forfeiture Money Judgment:

             a) A sum of money in the amount of $145,832.50, representing the gross

                proceeds personally obtained by the defendant as a result of the

                scheme or artifice to defraud for which he/she has been convicted;

                and an amount for which the defendant shall be solely liable and in

                satisfaction of which the United States may forfeit substitute assets

                pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p)

      2.     Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3) and 32.2(c)(l)(B), the United

States is authorized to conduct any discovery pursuant to the applicable Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure needed to identify, locate, or dispose of the above-referenced

property, or other substitute assets, including depositions, interrogatories, requests

for production of documents and for admission, and the issuance of subpoenas.

      3.     To the extent this Order constitutes a personal forfeiture money

judgment against the defendant, in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(6)(A),

the United States is not required to send or publish notice of the same, as there is no

specific property to be forfeited. However, this Order may be recorded in the records

of the Clerk of Court in any county in which the defendant resides or has either real

or personal property as a lien thereon. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure, the United States may move to amend this Order at any time


                                           3

       Case 5:23-cr-00025-D      Document 19     Filed 03/31/23   Page 3 of 4

                      0                                    0
to forfeit other property in which the defendant has an interest, whether directly

forfeitable or substitute assets, to satisfy this forfeiture money judgment in whole or

in part; provided that the net proceeds of any forfeited assets shall be credited toward

satisfaction of the judgment upon liquidation.

      4.     Upon sentencing and issuance of the Judgment and Commitment Order,

the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to incorporate a reference to this Order of Forfeiture

in the applicable section of the Judgment, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P.

32.2(b)(4)(B). In accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4)(A), with the defendant's

consent, this Order shall be final as to the defendant upon entry.

      5.     The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend

it as necessary, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e).

      SO ORDERED, this the 21. day of N, o.A.Cb            ,20b,i.




                                                   I ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WE ASK FOR THIS:


MICHAEL F. EASLEY, JR.
United States Attorney
                                               Defendant

BY:~
   DAVID G. BERAKA
Assistant United States Attorney               ~-
                                               MARKD. S EWART
Criminal Division                              Attorney for the Defendant


                                           4

        Case 5:23-cr-00025-D     Document 19      Filed 03/31/23     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File
19.pdf
Size
61,754 bytes
SHA-256
269d80b2233ad7ae7aa8992a8ff5423fc10496f0b673560a95f3619523f175bb
Our copy
19.pdf
Back to top