Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Nekita Donyae Hooks case — U.S. District Court, E.D.N.C. Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) — United States v. Hooks (Dkt. 47, E.D.N.C.)

Court filing

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) — United States v. Hooks (Dkt. 47, E.D.N.C.)

Summary

Form order (AO 247) of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina in United States v. Nekita Donyae Hooks, Case No. 5:23-CR-25-1D, on the defendant’s motion for a reduction in the term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), based on a guideline range later lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission. The motion is DENIED. The court states that it did not apply status points and so denies relief [D.E. 41]. The form gives the date of original judgment as 10/11/2023 and the defendant’s attorney as Alan DuBois, Federal Public Defender; the printed name of the judge is James C. Dever, United States District Judge. It was filed 05/15/24 as Document 47.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed May 15, 2024 in Nekita Donyae Hooks; one of 2 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Filed2024-05-15

Cite this document

“Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) — United States v. Hooks (Dkt. 47, E.D.N.C.).” U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, No. 5:23-cr-00025, Doc. 47, filed 2024-05-15. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-nekita-donyae-hooks-nced-198758/2024-05-15-gov-uscourts-nced-198758-47-0-doc-47/, SHA-256 a88d306eadf6a493f8009455525064baa512a25b272c1c5ef1ab7f570254db8d.

Full text

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)           Page I of2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)


                                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                                                         for the
                                                       Eastern District of North Carolina

                    United States of America
                                   v.                                       )
                                                                            )    Case No: 5:23-CR-25-1D
                       Nekita Donyae Hooks                                  )
                                                                            )   USMNo: 5_1_7_1_0-_5_10_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date of Original Judgment:           10/11/2023                             )
Date of Previous Amended Judgment: _ _ _ _ __                               )   Alan DuBois, Federal Public Defender
(Use Date ofLast Amended Judgment ifAny)                                         Defendant's Attorney


                   ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
                            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
        Upon motion of Ii] the defendant                D
                                                 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons                        D
                                                                                             the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG § 1B 1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
           liJDENIED.         D
                             GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the last judgment issued) of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ months is reduced to
                             (See Page 2for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II ofPage 2 when motion is granted)




           The court did not apply status points. Thus, the court denies relief [D.E. 41].




Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated - - - ~ - - - shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

•Order Date:
                                                                                          ~              Judge's signature


Effective Date: - - - - - - - - -                                                  James C. Dever 111, United States District Judge
                      (if different from order date)                                                   Printed name and title




                   Case 5:23-cr-00025-D                     Document 47                Filed 05/15/24              Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nced.198758.47.0.pdf
Size
39,034 bytes
SHA-256
a88d306eadf6a493f8009455525064baa512a25b272c1c5ef1ab7f570254db8d
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nced.198758.47.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top