Information — U.S. v. Lomax

Record facts

U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia · No. 2:25-cr-00057 · Doc. 5 · 2024-05-29 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Case 2:25-cr-00057 Document5 Filed 04/04/25 Page1of ‘T FILED —

APR - 4 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE et
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Le

CHARLESTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. CRIMINALNO, 2° Q5 -cR-00057

18 U.S.C. § 641

JAMES LOMAX

INFORMATION

The Acting United States Attorney charges:

From on or about April 25, 2020, and continuing through on or about July 18, 2020, at or
near St. Albans, Kanawha County, West Virginia and within in the Southern District of West
Virginia and elsewhere, defendant JAMES LOMAX did knowingly and willfully embezzle, steal,
purloin, and convert to his own use and the use of another, on a recurring basis, money belonging
to the United States and a department and agency thereof in a total amount greater than $1,000,
namely, unemployment compensation benefits having a value of approximately $13,312.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641.

Notice of Forfeiture

The allegations contained in this Information are hereby realleged and incorporated by
reference for the purpose of alleging forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C.
§ 2461 and Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461 and Rule 32.2 of the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure, upon conviction of the offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 and

as set forth in the Information, defendant JAMES LOMAX< shall forfeit to the United States of
Case 2:25-cr-00057 Document5 Filed 04/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: 9

America, any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds étndined, directly or indirectly, as
a result of such violation(s).

The property to be forfeited includes, but is not limited to, a money judgment in the amount
of at least $13,312.00, such amount constituting the proceeds of violations set forth in this
Information.

If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:

a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

b. has been transferred or sold to, = deposited with, a third party;

C. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;

d. has been substantially diminished in value; or

€; has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without
difficulty,

the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property pursuant to 21
U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461.

LISA G. STO
Acting United State lorney

By:

J. PARKER BAZZLE, 1 Vo ~~
Assistant United States Attorney

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.wvsd.241317.5.0.pdf

Size

396,165 bytes

SHA-256

14cb69640b0b10c018d7830f51062ca17245a9ab13244e04ae80f26c4f3ee38e

Our copy

gov.uscourts.wvsd.241317.5.0.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com