Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. French Indictment — United States v. Nikia A. French (Bank Fraud)

Court filing

Indictment — United States v. Nikia A. French (Bank Fraud)

Filed October 26, 2022 in U.S. v. French; one of 2 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court, E.D. Mo., Eastern Division
Filed2022-10-26

U.S. District Court, E.D. Mo., Eastern Division · No. 4:22-cr-00591-JAR-NCC · Doc. 2 · 2022-10-26 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRI CT OF MISSOURI 
EASTERN DlVISION 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
) 
) 
) 
) 
Plaintiff, 
V. 
NIKIA A. FRENCH, 
Defendant. 
The Grand Jury charges that: 
) No. 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
INDICTMENT 
INTRODUCTION 
At all times material to this Indictment, unl.ess otherwise specified below: 
FILED 
OCT 2 6 2022 
U S DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT Of MO 
ST. LOUIS 
I. 
Defendant NIKIA A. FRE CH ("FRENCH") was a resident of St. Louis County, 
Missouri, within the Eastern District of Missouri. 
2. 
Commerce Bank, the deposits of wh ich are insured by the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation, was a financial institution w ithin the meaning of Title 18, United States 
Code, Sections 20 and 1344. 
The Scheme 
3. 
Beginning no later than in or around February 2022, and continuing through at least 
in or around Apri l 2022, in the Eastern District of Missouri and elsewhere, the defendant, 
NIKIA A. FRENCH, 
and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, devised and intended to devise a scheme and 
artifice to obtain moneys, fu nds, credits, assets, securities, and other property owned by, or under 
4:22CR591-JAR/NCC
Case: 4:22-cr-00591-JAR-NCC   Doc. #:  2   Filed: 10/26/22   Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 8

the custody and control of, Commerce Bank, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, 
representations, and promises. 
Manner and Means 
4. 
It was part of the scheme that FRENCH recru ited and caused to be recruited 
individuals with bank accounts at Commerce Bank ("Account Holders") to aid and abet the scheme 
by allowing their Commerce Bank accounts to be used for the deposit of counterfeit checks. 
5. 
It was further part of the scheme that Account Holders provided debit cards, 
Personal Identification Numbers ("PINs"), and other banking information for their Commerce 
Bank accounts to FRENCH and other participants in the scheme. 
6. 
It was further part of the scheme that FRENCH made, obtained, and caused to be 
obtained counterfeit checks that were purportedly drawn on bank accounts of third parties, and 
that listed the names, addresses, and bank account information of these third parties. 
7. 
It was further part of the scheme that FRENCH caused the counterfeit checks to be 
made payable to Account Holders, without the knowledge or authorization of the third parties on 
whose bank accounts the counterfeit checks were purportedly drawn. 
8. 
It was further part of the scheme that FRENCH, using the debit cards and PINs 
belonging to Account Holders, conducted inquiries at Commerce Bank A TMs to determine 
whether Account Holders' Commerce Bank accounts were active and to determine the account 
balances. 
9. 
It was further part of the scheme that FRENCH, using the debit cards and PINs 
belonging to Account Holders, deposited and caused to be deposited what FRENCH knew to be 
counterfeit checks into Account Holders' Commerce bank accounts, for the purpose of 
fraudulently inflating the balances in those accounts. 
2 
Case: 4:22-cr-00591-JAR-NCC   Doc. #:  2   Filed: 10/26/22   Page: 2 of 5 PageID #: 9

10. 
It was further part of the scheme that FRENCH, through the deposit of the 
counterfeit checks, caused Commerce Bank to "float" funds from the counterfeit checks- that is, 
Commerce Bank made available a portion or the full amount of the counterfeit checks before they 
had been cleared by the third parties' financial institution. 
11. 
It was further part of the scheme that FRENCH, shortly after Commerce Bank made 
funds from the counterfeit checks available but before Commerce Bank learned that the checks 
were counterfeit, caused the funds from the counterfeit checks to be depleted from the Account 
Holders' Commerce Bank accounts, through cash withdrawals at ATMs and purchases using the 
debit cards belonging to Account Holders. 
12. 
It was further part of the scheme that FRENCH provided and caused to be provided 
a portion of the funds from the counterfeit checks to Account Holders as payment for allowing 
their Commerce Bank accounts to be used for the deposit of counterfeit checks. 
COUNT! 
Bank Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344(2)) 
13. 
Paragraphs 1 through 12 are realleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set 
forth herein. 
14. 
On or about February 15, 2022, in Affton, Missouri, in the Eastern District of 
Missouri, the defendant, 
NIKIA A. FRENCH, 
executed and attempted to execute the scheme and artifice described above, to obtain moneys, 
funds, credits, assets, securities, and other property owned by, and under the custody and control 
of a financial institution, as defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 20, by means of 
material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, in that FRENCH deposited 
and caused to be deposited a counterfeit check, bearing #3802 and purportedly drawn on Investors 
3 
Case: 4:22-cr-00591-JAR-NCC   Doc. #:  2   Filed: 10/26/22   Page: 3 of 5 PageID #: 10

Bank account #xxxxx6329, and made payable to Individual L.P. in the amount of $4,698.07, into 
Commerce Bank account #xxxxx0359 in the name of Jndividual L.P., for the purpose of obtaining 
money, funds, credits, assets, securities, and other property owned by, and under the custody and 
control of Commerce Bank. 
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344(2). 
COUNT II 
Bank Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344(2)) 
15. 
Paragraphs 1 through 12 are realleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set 
forth herein. 
16. 
On or about February 15, 2022, in Affton, Missouri, in the Eastern District of 
Missouri, the defendant, 
NIKIA A. FRENCH, 
executed and attempted to execute the scheme and artifice described above, to obtain moneys, 
funds, credits, assets, securities, and other property owned by, and under the custody and control 
of a financial institution, as defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 20, by means of 
material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, in that FRE CH withdrew 
and caused to be withdrawn $1 ,000 from Commerce Bank account #xxxxx0359 in the name of 
Individual L.P. through a cash withdrawal at an ATM, for the purpose of obtaining money, funds, 
credits, assets, securities, and other property owned by, and under the custody and control of 
Commerce Bank. 
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344(2). 
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION 
The Grand Jury further finds by probable cause that: 
I. 
Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2), upon conviction of an 
4 
Case: 4:22-cr-00591-JAR-NCC   Doc. #:  2   Filed: 10/26/22   Page: 4 of 5 PageID #: 11

offense in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344, as set forth in Count I - II, the 
Defendant shall forfeit to the United States of America any property constituting, or derived from, 
proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such violation(s). Subject to forfeiture is a 
sum of money equal to the total value of property, real or personal, constituting or derived from 
any proceeds traceable to such violation. 
2. 
If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the 
Defendants: 
a. 
cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; 
b. 
has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; 
c. 
has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; 
d. 
has been substantially diminished in value; or 
e. 
has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without 
difficulty, 
the United States of America will be entitled to the forfeiture of substitute property pursuant to 
Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p). 
SAYLER A. FLEMING 
United States Attorney 
JONA THAN A. CLOW, #68003MO 
Assistant United States Attorney 
A TRUE BILL. 
FOREPERSON 
5 
Case: 4:22-cr-00591-JAR-NCC   Doc. #:  2   Filed: 10/26/22   Page: 5 of 5 PageID #: 12

File and source

File
United_States_v._French__moed_4-22-cr-00591__doc2__gov.uscourts.moed.198753.2.0.pdf
Size
137,683 bytes
SHA-256
5aac9e4b17143c56a1e13936c91d076495565348ff7666d4caa9cb0de697fff7
Our copy
United_States_v._French__moed_4-22-cr-00591__doc2__gov.uscourts.moed.198753.2.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top