Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Daragjati

Summary

A Preliminary Order of Forfeiture for Proceeds, filed August 10, 2023 as Document 31 in United States of America v. Christopher Leo Daragjati, Case No. 3:23-cr-48-TJC-LLL, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. The order grants the United States' motion (Doc. 30) for forfeiture of proceeds of $200,000, the amount the defendant admits he obtained as a result of the offenses charged in Counts One, Eleven, and Thirteen of the Indictment. Under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2), it holds the defendant liable for $200,000 and states that the order is final as to the defendant. Because the $200,000 was dissipated, it allows the United States to seek substitute assets up to that value under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p).

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Case 3:23-cr-00048-TJC-LLL Document31 Filed 08/10/23. Page1of 2 PagelD 128

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA uy
Vv. Case No. 3:23-cr-48-TJC-LLL
CHRISTOPHER LEO DARAGJATI

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE FOR PROCEEDS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the United States’ Motion for
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture of Proceeds in the amount of $200,000, representing
the amount of proceeds the defendant admits he obtained as a result of the offenses
charged in Counts One, Eleven, and Thirteen of the Indictment.

Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court finds that the defendant
personally obtained $200,000 as a result of the offenses, of which he has pleaded
guilty.

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that for good cause shown, the
United States’ motion, Doc. 30, is GRANTED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28
U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2), the defendant shall be held liable
for a preliminary order of forfeiture for proceeds in the amount of $200,000.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the preliminary order of forfeiture for

proceeds is final as to the defendant.
Case 3:23-cr-00048-TJC-LLL Document 31 Filed 08/10/23 Page 2 of 2 PagelD 129

It is FURTHER ORDERED that, because the $200,000 was dissipated by the
defendant, the United States may seek, as a substitute asset, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.

§ 853(p), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), forfeiture of any of the defendant’s
property up to the value of $200,000.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that, the United States may also conduct
discovery (including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of
documents, and the issuance of subpoenas), pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to help identify, locate, and forfeit substitute
assets. The court retains jurisdiction to enter any order necessary to the forfeiture and
disposition of any substitute asset.

The Court retains jurisdiction to address any third-party claim that may be
asserted, to enter any further order necessary for the forfeiture and disposition of
such property, and to order any substitute assets forfeited to the United States up to
the amount of the preliminary order of forfeiture for proceeds.

DONE and ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this _ / day of

Luc et 2023.
7 / '

\

TIMOTHY J. CORRI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:
Mai Tran, AUSA
Counsel of Record

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.412227.31.0.pdf

Size

835,486 bytes

SHA-256

9b25d18ef121107cf7370ee7427e5e5d5b89076758f8412952915b905a1390f5

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.412227.31.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)