Court filing
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Daragjati
Filed August 10, 2023 in U.S. v. Daragjati; one of 6 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville Division) |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-08-10 |
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville Division) · No. 3:23-cr-00048-TJC-LLL · Doc. 31 · 2023-08-10 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 3:23-cr-00048-TJC-LLL Document31 Filed 08/10/23. Page1of 2 PagelD 128 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA uy Vv. Case No. 3:23-cr-48-TJC-LLL CHRISTOPHER LEO DARAGJATI PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE FOR PROCEEDS THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the United States’ Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture of Proceeds in the amount of $200,000, representing the amount of proceeds the defendant admits he obtained as a result of the offenses charged in Counts One, Eleven, and Thirteen of the Indictment. Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court finds that the defendant personally obtained $200,000 as a result of the offenses, of which he has pleaded guilty. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that for good cause shown, the United States’ motion, Doc. 30, is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2), the defendant shall be held liable for a preliminary order of forfeiture for proceeds in the amount of $200,000. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the preliminary order of forfeiture for proceeds is final as to the defendant. Case 3:23-cr-00048-TJC-LLL Document 31 Filed 08/10/23 Page 2 of 2 PagelD 129 It is FURTHER ORDERED that, because the $200,000 was dissipated by the defendant, the United States may seek, as a substitute asset, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), forfeiture of any of the defendant’s property up to the value of $200,000. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, the United States may also conduct discovery (including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and the issuance of subpoenas), pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to help identify, locate, and forfeit substitute assets. The court retains jurisdiction to enter any order necessary to the forfeiture and disposition of any substitute asset. The Court retains jurisdiction to address any third-party claim that may be asserted, to enter any further order necessary for the forfeiture and disposition of such property, and to order any substitute assets forfeited to the United States up to the amount of the preliminary order of forfeiture for proceeds. DONE and ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this _ / day of Luc et 2023. 7 / ' \ TIMOTHY J. CORRI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: Mai Tran, AUSA Counsel of Record
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flmd.412227.31.0.pdf
- Size
- 835,486 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9b25d18ef121107cf7370ee7427e5e5d5b89076758f8412952915b905a1390f5
- Original
- PACER (login required)