Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Arthur Spitzer case — U.S. District Court, D.N.J. Plea Agreement with Joshua Feldberger — No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 109, D.N.J.)

Court filing

Plea Agreement with Joshua Feldberger — No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 109, D.N.J.)

Summary

A plea agreement letter dated September 10, 2025 from AUSA Daniel A. Friedman to Zach Intrater of Agnifilo Intrater LLP, counsel for Joshua Feldberger, filed October 22, 2025 in Criminal No. 24-528 (ESK) in the District of New Jersey. Feldberger agrees to plead guilty to bank fraud conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1349, which carries a statutory maximum of 30 years and a fine of up to $1,000,000 or twice the gain or loss. The letter states that the court must order restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663 and forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(A).

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed October 22, 2025 in No. 1:24-cr-00528; one of 21 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Filed2025-10-22

Cite this document

“Plea Agreement with Joshua Feldberger — No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 109, D.N.J.).” U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 1:24-cr-00528, Doc. 109, filed 2025-10-22. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-arthur-spitzer/2025-10-22-dkt-109/, SHA-256 670dac96ea8ff448d8ed88d820967f03767e4edd045386a6874a7efb293c7dbf.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document109_ Filed 10/22/25 Page 1 of 9 PagelD: 513

U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
District of New Jersey

DANIEL A. FRIEDMAN 401 Market Street, Fourth Floor
Assistant United States Attorney Camden, New Jersey 08101-2098

Direct Dial: 856.968.4867
Email: Daniel. friedman2@usdoj.gov

September 10, 2025

Zach Intrater

Agnifilo Intrater LLP
445 Park Avenue, 7th FI.
New York, NY 10022
zach@agilawgroup.com

Re: Plea Agreement with Joshua Feldberger
Criminal No. 24-528 (ESK)

Dear Mr. Intrater:

This letter sets forth the plea agreement between your client, Joshua F eldberger, and the
United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey (the “Office”), This offer will expire
on Friday, September 12, 2025, if it is not accepted in writing by that date. If Joshua Feldberger
does not accept this plea agreement, his sentencing exposure could increase beyond what is
discussed in this plea agreement as a result of this Office’s investigation.

Charges

Conditioned on the understandings specified below, the Office will accept a guilty plea
from Joshua Feldberger to a one-count Superseding Information charging him with bank fraud
conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. If Joshua Feldberger enters a guilty plea and is
sentenced on this charge, and otherwise fully complies with this agreement, this Office will not
initiate any further criminal charges against Joshua Feldberger for making false statements in
connection with the mortgage loan secured by real estate properties located on Malcolm X
Boulevard in Brooklyn, New York, his role in conspiring with Arthur Spitzer or Mendel Deutsch
to defraud property owners or financial institutions, or for laundering or spending the proceeds
from loans obtained as a result of the aforementioned fraudulent conduct. In addition, if Joshua
Feldberger fully complies with all of the terms of this agreement, at the time of sentencing in this
matter, this Office will move to dismiss Counts 6-10 of the Indictment in Criminal No. 24-528
(ESI) against him. Joshua Feldberger agrees that uncharged or dismissed counts may be taken


Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document109_ Filed 10/22/25 Page 2 of 9 PagelD: 514

into account as relevant conduct by the Court at the time of sentencing pursuant to U.S.S.G, §
1B1.2(c) or § 1B1,3(a).

But ifa guilty plea in this matter is not entered for any reason or a guilty plea or judgment
of conviction entered in accordance with this agreement does not remain in full force and effect,
this Office may reinstate any dismissed charges and initiate any other charges against Joshua
Feldberger even if the applicable statute of limitations period for those charges expires after Joshua
Feldberger signs this agreement, and Joshua Feldberger agrees not to assert that any such charges
are time-barred.

Sentencing

The violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (Bank Fraud Conspiracy) to which Joshua Feldberger
agrees to plead guilty carries a statutory maximum prison sentence of 30 years and a statutory
maximum fine equal to the greatest of: (1) $1,000,000; (2) twice the gross amount of any pecuniary
gain that any persons derived from the offense; or (3) twice the gross amount of any pecuniary
loss sustained by any victims of the offense. The prison sentence may run consecutively to any
prison sentence Joshua Feldberger is serving or is ordered to serve.

The sentence to be imposed upon Joshua Feldberger is within the sole discretion of the
sentencing judge, subject to the provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act, 18 U.S.C, §§ 3551-
3742, and the sentencing judge’s consideration of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, Those
Guidelines are advisory, not mandatory. The sentencing judge may impose any reasonable
sentence up to and including the statutory maximum term of imprisonment and the maximum
statutory fine. This Office cannot and does not make any representation or promise as to what
Guidelines range may be found by the sentencing judge, or as to what sentence Joshua F eldberger
ultimately will receive,

Further, in addition to imposing any other penalty on Joshua Feldberger, the sentencing
judge as part of the sentence:

(1) will order Joshua Feldberger to pay an assessment of $100, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3013, which assessment must be paid by the date of sentencing;

(2) — must order Joshua F eldberger to pay restitution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663 er
Seq.

(3) may order Joshua Feldberger, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3555, to give reasonable
notice and explanation of the conviction to any victims of his offense;

(4) must order forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(A) and 28°U.S.C. § 2461;

(5) pursuant to 18 U.S.C, § 3583, may require Joshua F eldberger to serve a term of
supervised release of not more than 5 years, which will begin at the expiration of
any term of imprisonment imposed. Should Joshua Feldberger be placed on a

2


Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document109_ Filed 10/22/25 Page 3 of 9 PagelD: 515

term of supervised release and subsequently violate any of the conditions of
supervised release before the expiration of its term, Joshua Feldberger may be
sentenced to not more than 3 years’ imprisonment, in addition to any prison term
previously imposed, regardless of the statutory maximum term of imprisonment
set forth above and without credit for time previously served on post-release
supervision, and may be sentenced to an additional term of supervised release.

Restitution

Pursuant to the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, Joshua Feldberger
agrees to pay full restitution to the victims of the offense of conviction or from the scheme,
conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity underlying that offense in an amount that fully
compensates the victims for the losses sustained as a result of that offense.

Forfeiture

As part of his acceptance of responsibility, Joshua Feldberger agrees to forfeit to the United
States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(A), any property, real or personal, constituting, or derived
from, proceeds he obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of the offense
charged in the Superseding Information. Joshua Feldberger further agrees that one or more of the
conditions set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) exists; and that the United States is therefore entitled to
forfeit substitute assets equal to but not greater than the value of the proceeds obtained by the
defendant (the “Money Judgment”). The parties do not presently agree on the amount of the
Money Judgment. The Government will argue that the Money Judgment should be $100,000,
while Joshua Feldberger will argue that the Money Judgement should be $21,000. The defendant
consents to the entry of an order requiring the defendant to pay the Money Judgment, in the manner
described below (the “Ordet”), and that the Order will be final as to the defendant prior to
sentencing, pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and which
may be satisfied in whole or in part with substitute assets. Joshua Feldberger further agrees that
upon entry of the Order, the United States Attorney’s Office is authorized to conduct any discovery
needed to identify, locate, or dispose of property sufficient to pay the Forfeiture Amount in full or
in connection with any petitions filed with regard to proceeds or substitute assets, including
depositions, interrogatories, and requests for production of documents, and the issuance of
subpoenas, and Joshua Feldberger agrees to cooperate with this discovery.

All payments made in full or partial satisfaction of the Forfeiture Amount shall be made
by postal money order, bank, or certified check, made payable in this instance to the United States
Marshals Service, indicating Joshua Feldberger’s name and case number on the face of the check;
and shall be delivered by mail to the United States Attorney’s Office, District of New Jersey, Attn:
Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Unit, 970 Broad Street, 7th Floor, Newark, New Jersey
07102.

Joshua Feldberger waives the requirements of Rules 32.2 and 43(a) of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, announcement
of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment. Joshua

3

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document109_ Filed 10/22/25 Page 4 of 9 PagelD: 516

Feldberger understands that criminal forfeiture is part of the sentence that may be imposed in this
case and waives any failure by the court to advise him of this pursuant to Rule 11(b)(1)(Q) of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure at the guilty plea proceeding. Joshua Feldberger waives any
and all constitutional, statutory, and other challenges to the forfeiture on any and all grounds,
including that the forfeiture constitutes an excessive fine or punishment under the Eighth
Amendment. It is further understood that any forfeiture of Joshua Feldberger’s assets shall not be
treated as satisfaction of any fine, restitution, cost of imprisonment, or any other penalty the Court
may impose upon him in addition to forfeiture.

Joshua Feldberger further agrees that not later than the date he enters plea of guilty he will
provide a complete and accurate Financial Disclosure Statement on the form provided by this
Office. If Joshua Feldberger fails to provide a complete and accurate Financial Disclosure
Statement by the date he enters his plea of guilty, or if this Office determines that Joshua
Feldberger has intentionally failed to disclose assets on his Financial Disclosure Statement, Joshua
Feldberger agrees that that failure constitutes a material breach of this agreement, and this Office
reserves the right, regardless of any agreement or stipulation that might otherwise apply, to oppose
any downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, and to
seek leave of the Court to withdraw from this agreement or seek other relief.

Rights of The Office Regarding Sentencing

Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, this Office reserves the right to take any
position with respect to the appropriate sentence to be imposed on Joshua Feldberger by the
sentencing judge. This Office may also correct any misstatements relating to the sentencing
proceedings and provide the sentencing judge and the United States Probation Office all law and
information relevant to sentencing, favorable or otherwise. And this Office may inform the
sentencing judge and the United States Probation Office of: (1) this agreement; and (2) the full
nature and extent of Joshua Feldberger’s activities and relevant conduct with respect to this case.

Stipulations

This Office and Joshua Feldberger will stipulate at sentencing to the statements set forth in
the attached Schedule A, which is part of this plea agreement. Both parties understand that the
sentencing judge and the United States Probation Office are not bound by those stipulations and
may make independent factual findings and may reject any or all of the parties’ stipulations. Nor
do these stipulations restrict the parties’ rights to respond to questions from the Court and to correct
misinformation that has been provided to the Court.

This agreement to stipulate on the part of this Office is based on the information and
evidence that this Office possesses as of the date of this agreement. Thus, if this Office obtains or
receives additional evidence or information prior to sentencing that it believes materially conflicts
with a Schedule A stipulation, that stipulation shall no longer bind this Office. A determination
that a Schedule A stipulation is not binding shall not release the parties from any other portion of
this agreement, including any other Schedule A stipulation.

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document 109 Filed 10/22/25 Page 5 of 9 PagelD: 517

If the sentencing court rejects a Schedule A stipulation, both parties reserve the right to
argue on appeal or at post-sentencing proceedings that the sentencing court did so properly.
Finally, to the extent that the parties do not stipulate to a particular fact or legal conclusion in this
agreement, each reserves the right to argue how that fact or conclusion should affect the sentence.

Waiver of Appeal and Post-Sentencing Rights

As set forth in Schedule A and the paragraph below, this Office and Joshua Feldberger
waive certain rights to appeal, collaterally attack, or otherwise challenge the judgment of
conviction or sentence.

Immigration Consequences

Joshua Feldberger understands that, if Joshua Feldberger is not a citizen of the United
States, Joshua Feldberger’s guilty plea to the charged offense will likely result in Joshua
Feldberger being subject to immigration proceedings and removed from the United States by
making Joshua Feldberger deportable, excludable, or inadmissible, or ending Joshua Feldberger’s
naturalization. Joshua Feldberger understands that the immigration consequences of this plea will
be imposed in a separate proceeding before the immigration authorities. Joshua Feldberger wants
and agrees to plead guilty to the charged offense regardless of any immigration consequences of
this plea, even if this plea will cause Joshua Feldberger’s removal from the United States. Joshua
Feldberger understands that Joshua Feldberger is bound by this guilty plea regardless of any
immigration consequences. Accordingly, Joshua Feldberger waives any right to challenge the
_ guilty plea, sentence, or both based on any immigration consequences. Joshua Feldberger also
agrees not to seek to withdraw this guilty plea, or to file a direct appeal, or any kind of collateral
attack challenging the guilty plea, conviction, or sentence, based on any immigration consequences
of the guilty plea or sentence.

Other Provisions

This agreement is limited to the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New
Jersey and cannot bind other federal, state, or local authorities. If requested to do so, however,
this Office will bring this agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices,

This agreement was reached without regard to any civil or administrative matters that may
be pending or commenced in the future against Joshua Feldberger. So this agreement does not
prohibit the United States, any agency thereof (including the Internal Revenue Service and
Immigration and Customs Enforcement) or any third party from initiating or prosecuting any civil
or administrative proceeding against him,

No provision of this agreement shall preclude Joshua Feldberger from pursuing in an
appropriate forum, when permitted by law, a claim that he received constitutionally ineffective
assistance of counsel.

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document109_ Filed 10/22/25 Page 6 of 9 PagelD: 518

Joshua Feldberger agrees to inform the New Jersey Department of Banking & Insurance
of his guilty plea and agrees to cooperate fully in any proceeding involving his insurance producer
license.

No Other Promises

This agreement constitutes the entire plea agreement between Joshua Feldberger and this
Office and supersedes any previous agreements between them. No additional promises,
agreements, or conditions have been made or will be made unless set forth in writing and signed
by the parties.

Very truly yours,

JAMES MCHENRY
U.S. Associate Deputy Attorney General

ALINA HABBA
Acting United States Attorney
Special Attorney

QML

By: DANIEL A. FRIEDMAN .
ELISA T. WIYGUL
Assistant United States Attorneys

APPROVED:

SARA A. ALIABADI
Deputy Attorney-In-Charge, Camden

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document 109 Filed 10/22/25 Page 7 of 9 PagelD: 519

I have received this letter from my attorney, Zach Intrater, Esq. J have read it. My attorney
and I have reviewed and discussed it and all of its provisions, including those addressing the
charge, sentencing, stipulations (including the attached Schedule A), waiver, forfeiture, restitution,
and immigration consequences. I understand this letter fully and am satisfied with my counsel’s
explanations. I accept its terms and conditions and acknowledge that it constitutes the plea
agreement between the parties. I understand that no additional promises, agreements, or conditions
have been made or will be made unless set forth in writing and signed by the parties. I want to
plead guilty pursuant to this plea agreement.

AGREED AND ACCEPTED;

Bn a Date: 9/11/2025
S

HUA FELDBERGER

I have reviewed and discussed with my client this plea agreement and all of its provisions,
including those addressing the charge, sentencing, stipulations (including the attached Schedule
A), waiver, forfeiture, restitution, and immigration consequences. My client understands this plea
agreement fully and wants to plead guilty pursuant to it.

Date: 9/11/2025

ZACH INTRATER, Esq.
Counsel to Defendant Joshua Feldberger

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document109_ Filed 10/22/25 Page 8 of 9 PagelD: 520

Plea Agreement with Joshua Feldberger

Schedule A

1, The Office and Joshua Feldberger recognize that the United States Sentencing
Guidelines are not binding upon the Court. Each party nevertheless agrees to these stipulations.

2. The version of the Guidelines effective November |, 2024, applies in this case.

3, The applicable guideline is USSG §2X1.1. Pursuant to USSG §2X1.1(a), the Base
Offense Level is the base offense level from the guideline for the substantive offense, plus any
adjustments from such guideline for any intended offense conduct that can be established with
reasonable certainty.

4, The applicable guideline is U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1. This guideline carries a Base Offense
Level of 7 because the statutory maximum prison sentence for the charged offense is 20 years or
more,

5. The parties do not presently agree as to the applicability of U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(1).
This Office will argue that Joshua Feldberger’s offense involved a loss of more than $3,500,000
but not more than $9,500,000, resulting in an increase of [8 levels. See U.S.S.G. § 2BL.1(b)C1)C).
Joshua Feldberger disputes the loss amount. Both parties reserve their right to argue their
respective positions at sentencing.

6. The parties do not presently agree as to the applicability of U.S.S.G,
§ 2BI.1(b)(10)(C). This Office will argue that the offense involved sophisticated means and that
Joshua Feldberger intentionally engaged in or caused the conduct constituting sophisticated means,
resulting in an increase of 2 levels. Joshua Feldberger may take the position that this Specific
Offense Characteristic does not apply. Both parties reserve their right to argue their respective
positions at sentencing.

7. The parties agree that Joshua Feldberger abused a position of public or private trust
in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission or concealment of the offense, resulting
in an increase of 2 levels.

8. The parties agree that Joshua Feldberger was a minor participant pursuant to
U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) and that, as a result, he is entitled to a 2-level reduction in his offense level.

9, As of the date of this letter, Joshua Feldberger has clearly demonstrated a
recognition and affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility for the offense charged.
Therefore, a downward adjustment of 2 levels for acceptance of responsibility is appropriate if
Joshua Feldberger’s acceptance of responsibility continues through the date of sentencing. See
ULS.S.G. § 3EI.1 fa).

10. As of the date of this letter, Joshua Feldberger has assisted authorities in the
investigation or prosecution of his own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of his intention
to enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the Office to avoid preparing for trial and permitting
the Office and the court to allocate their resources efficiently. At sentencing, the Office will move

8

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document109_ Filed 10/22/25 Page 9 of 9 PagelD: 521

for a further |-point reduction in Joshua Feldberger’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b)
if the following conditions are met: (a) Joshua Feldberger enters a plea pursuant to this agreement,
(b) this Office, in its discretion, determines that Joshua Feldberger’s acceptance of responsibility
has continued through the date of sentencing and Joshua Feldberger therefore qualifies for a
2-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a), and (c) Joshua
Feldberger’s offense level under the Guidelines prior to the operation of § 3E1.1(a) is 16 or greater.

11. If Joshua Feldberger establishes at sentencing that he both has no criminal history
points and meets the other criteria in U.S.S.G. § 4C1.1, he will be entitled to a further two-level
reduction in his offense level.

12, The parties agree not to advocate for any upward or downward adjustment or
departure from the Guidelines range resulting from (a) the total offense level applicable that the
sentencing judge applies to Joshua Feldberger at Step I of sentencing; and (b) the criminal history
category that the sentencing judge applies under Chapter 4 of the Guidelines without any departure
or variance. But each party may seek a variance from that Guidelines range, which the other party
may oppose.

13. If the term of imprisonment does not exceed 6 months, and except as specified in
the next paragraph below, Joshua Feldberger will not challenge or seek to reduce by any means
any component of the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge for any reason other than
ineffective assistance of counsel. The term “any means” includes a direct appeal under [8 U.S.C.
§ 3742 or 28 U.S.C. § 1291, a motion to vacate the sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a motion to
reduce the term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1) or (c)(2), a motion for early
termination of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1), and any other appeal, motion,
petition, or writ, however captioned, that seeks to attack or modify any component of the sentence.
If the term of imprisonment is at least 63 months, this Office will not challenge by appeal, motion,
or writ any component of the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge. The provisions of this
paragraph bind the parties even if the sentencing judge employs a Guidelines analysis different
from the one above.

14. Both parties reserve the right to file or to oppose any appeal, collateral attack, writ
or motion not barred by the preceding paragraph or any other provision of this plea agreement.
Moreover, the preceding paragraph does not apply to:

i. Any proceeding to revoke the term of supervised release;

ii. A motion for a reduction of the term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. §
3582(c)(1)(A); or

iii. An appeal from the denial of a § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion on the grounds that
the court erred in finding no extraordinary and compelling circumstances
warranting a reduced term of imprisonment or that the court failed to
consider those circumstances as a discretionary matter under the
applicable factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

File and source

File
109.pdf
Size
381,268 bytes
SHA-256
670dac96ea8ff448d8ed88d820967f03767e4edd045386a6874a7efb293c7dbf
Our copy
109.pdf
Back to top