Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Arthur Spitzer case — U.S. District Court, D.N.J. Reply on GPS Location Monitoring — No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 80, D.N.J.)

Court filing

Reply on GPS Location Monitoring — No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 80, D.N.J.)

Summary

A reply letter dated July 30, 2025 from counsel for Arthur Spitzer to Judge Edward S. Kiel in United States v. Spitzer, 24 Cr. 528 (ESK), in the District of New Jersey, answering the government's opposition (ECF 79) to Spitzer's motion to remove the pretrial condition of GPS location monitoring. It quotes the government's point that Spitzer's family members have not surrendered their passports. In response, Spitzer agrees to add a condition requiring family members to surrender their passports to Pretrial Services.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed July 30, 2025 in No. 1:24-cr-00528; one of 21 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Filed2025-07-30

Cite this document

“Reply on GPS Location Monitoring — No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 80, D.N.J.).” U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 1:24-cr-00528, Doc. 80, filed 2025-07-30. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-arthur-spitzer/2025-07-30-dkt-80/, SHA-256 1279c944058bd45f9e014d28a5a3ccb5a7bfc19d470a62c207643a7de9150ad5.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK Document 80 Filed 07/30/25 Page 1 of 1 PagelD: 297

Meister Seelig & Fein PLLC Jason I. Ser

Partner

Direct (646) 539-3712
Fax (212) 655-3535
jis@msf-law.com

July 30, 2025

VIA ECF

The Honorable Edward S. Kiel

United States District Judge

District of New Jersey

Mitchell H. Cohen Building & U.S. Courthouse
4th & Cooper Streets, Room 1050

Camden, New Jersey 08101

Re: United States v. Spitzer, et. al., 24 Cr. 528 (ESK)
Dear Judge Kiel,

We write on behalf of our client, Arthur Spitzer, to reply to the government’s opposition to his
motion to remove the pretrial release condition of GPS location monitoring (“Opp.”). (ECF 79.) In
response to Mr. Spitzer’s argument that he would never seek to flee by himself and leave his wife and
children behind, the government asserts that “nothing prevents his family from joining him. His family
members have not surrendered their passports and are subject to no travel restrictions.” (Opp. at 4.)

Mr. Spitzer agrees to add a condition requiring his wife and children to surrender their passports
to Pretrial Services to alleviate the government’s concerns about his family leaving with him.

Respectfully yours,

/s/ Jason I. Ser
Henry E. Mazurek
Jason I. Ser
Meister Seelig & Fein PLLC

Attorneys for Arthur Spitzer

cc: Counsel of record (via email)
United States Pretrial Services (via email)

125 Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10017 | Phone (212) 655-3500 | Fax (212) 655-3535 | meisterseelig.com

File and source

File
80.pdf
Size
193,560 bytes
SHA-256
1279c944058bd45f9e014d28a5a3ccb5a7bfc19d470a62c207643a7de9150ad5
Our copy
80.pdf
  1. No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 42, D.N.J.)same docket · 2025-02-05
  2. No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 49, D.N.J.)same docket · 2025-03-14
  3. No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 64, D.N.J.)same docket · 2025-05-09
  4. No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 67, D.N.J.)same docket · 2025-05-20
  5. No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 68, D.N.J.)same docket · 2025-05-21
  6. No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 87, D.N.J.)same docket · 2025-09-12
  7. No. 1:24-cr-00528 (Dkt. 109, D.N.J.)same docket · 2025-10-22

Part of: U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey · Criminal prosecutions · 2025 · Court filings

Back to top