Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Rumson Wellness LLC et al. v. Fountainhead SBF LLC et al. Order granting motion to dismiss — Rumson Wellness LLC v. Fountainhead SBF LLC — Rumson Wellness LLC et al. v. Fountainhead SBF LLC et al. (D.N.J.)

Court filing

Order granting motion to dismiss — Rumson Wellness LLC v. Fountainhead SBF LLC — Rumson Wellness LLC et al. v. Fountainhead SBF LLC et al. (D.N.J.)

Filed April 28, 2026 in Rumson Wellness LLC et al. v. Fountainhead SBF LLC et al.; one of 3 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
Filed2026-04-28

U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · No. 3:25-cv-11931-MAS-TJB · Doc. 29 · 2026-04-28 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Case 3:25-cv-11931-MAS-TJB Document 29 _ Filed 04/28/26 Page 1 of 2 PagelD: 294

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

RUMSON WELLNESS LLC, ef al.,

Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No. 25-11931 (MAS) (TJB)
Vv.
ORDER
FOUNTAINHEAD SBF LLC, et ai.,

Defendants.

This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants Fountainhead SBF LLC
(“Fountainhead”), Community Bank & Trust — West Georgia (“Community Bank’’), and Phoenix
Lender Services, LLC’s (“Phoenix,” and collectively with Fountainhead and Community Bank,
Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23) Plaintiffs Rumson Wellness LCC (“Rumson
Wellness”), Dylan Ross (“Dylan”), and Taylor Ross’s (“Taylor,” and collectively with Rumson
Wellness and Dylan, “Plaintiffs”) Amended Complaint (ECF No. 15). Plaintiffs opposed (ECF No.
26), and Defendants replied (ECF No. 27). The Court has carefully considered the parties’
submissions and decides the matter without oral argument pursuant to Local Civil Rule 78.1(b).
For the reasons outlined in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion,

IT IS, on this 28th day of April 2026, ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (ECF No. 15) is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
Case 3:25-cv-11931-MAS-TJB Document 29 _ Filed 04/28/26 Page 2 of 2 PagelD: 295

3. Plaintiffs shall be afforded an opportunity to file a second amended complaint to
address the deficiencies identified in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion.

Plaintiffs have forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order to file a second
amended complaint.

4, The Clerk shall close this matter,

/s/ Michael A. Shipp
MICHAEL A. SHIPP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

File and source

File
CASE_NJD_3-25-cv-11931_Rumson-v-Fountainhead_doc29_ORDER_2026-04-28.pdf
Size
85,650 bytes
SHA-256
1925f1a934364f01d8e7d81f55832c8102d24760b867c620f7d85eb942aa8f6c
Our copy
CASE_NJD_3-25-cv-11931_Rumson-v-Fountainhead_doc29_ORDER_2026-04-28.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top