Case docket
Rumson Wellness LLC v. Fountainhead SBF LLC — U.S. District Court, D.N.J.
Rumson Wellness LLC v. Fountainhead SBF LLC — U.S. District Court, D.N.J. — 3 documents in the archive, dated July 10, 2025 to April 28, 2026.
Profile: Fountainhead
Case facts
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey |
|---|---|
| Docket number | No. 3:25-cv-11931 — main docket |
| Filings | 3 public filings |
| Filed | 2025-07-10 – 2026-04-28 |
| Original PDFs | 3 of 3 |
| Profiles | Fountainhead |
Case summary
Rumson Wellness LLC and two individual plaintiffs brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 3:25-cv-11931-MAS-TJB, against Fountainhead SBF LLC, Community Bank & Trust - West Georgia and Phoenix Lender Services, LLC. The amended complaint, filed July 10, 2025, seeks declaratory and equitable relief and damages arising from a Small Business Administration 7(a) loan of $923,000 that the defendants originated, hold, service or have sought to enforce, and pleads four causes of action against all defendants. The page also lists a memorandum opinion and an order on a motion to dismiss, both filed April 28, 2026; both are scans whose extracted text is only page stamps, so their contents cannot be read from this page.
Case at a glance
| Parties | Plaintiffs Rumson Wellness LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, and two individual plaintiffs; defendants Fountainhead SBF LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Community Bank & Trust - West Georgia, a Georgia domestic bank, and Phoenix Lender Services, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company |
|---|---|
| Court and docket | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 3:25-cv-11931-MAS-TJB. The amended complaint is Document 15; the memorandum opinion is Document 28 and the order Document 29 |
| Program | Not a pandemic relief program. The loan at issue is an SBA 7(a) loan, SBA Loan No. 94237982-03, in the principal amount of $923,000. No filing on this page mentions the Paycheck Protection Program, Economic Injury Disaster Loans, the CARES Act or the pandemic |
| Claims | First cause of action, negligent misrepresentation; second, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; third, unjust enrichment; fourth, declaratory relief. All four are pleaded against all defendants |
| Disposition or status | Not readable from the filings on this page. The case index titles Document 29 "Order granting motion to dismiss"; the document itself extracts only as two page stamps, and the sixteen-page memorandum opinion of the same date extracts the same way |
| Status checked | 2026-09-23 · against DOJ press releases through 2026-09-22; court docket not yet read |
What does the amended complaint allege?
That the loan was issued to fund what the plaintiffs believed was a legitimate business opportunity with a Water Station Technology franchise, to be secured by 120 water vending machines valued at $1,020,000 and a lien on the individual plaintiffs' residence, and that the underlying business was a Ponzi scheme, so that the loan is void. These are the complaint's allegations.
What relief does it seek?
Damages, rescission of the loan, release of the lien on the individual plaintiffs' residence to the extent it is not timely released following payoff, declaratory relief and other equitable relief.
What can be read of the April 2026 rulings?
Only their captions and stamps: Document 28, sixteen pages, and Document 29, two pages, both filed April 28, 2026 in No. 3:25-cv-11931-MAS-TJB. Neither document's text is in the archive's extraction.
Docket
3 documents in docket-entry order; attachments follow their entry. Gaps name the entries we do not have.
No. 3:25-cv-11931
- Amended complaint — Rumson Wellness LLC v. Fountainhead SBF LLCEntry 15
- —Entries 16–27 are not in the archive
- Memorandum opinion on motion to dismiss — Rumson Wellness LLC v. Fountainhead SBF LLCEntry 28
- Order granting motion to dismiss — Rumson Wellness LLC v. Fountainhead SBF LLCEntry 29
More documents from this case’s dockets
1 more document linked to this case’s dockets is in the archive and not in the docket above.
Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.