Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Staveley and Butziger Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Staveley, No. 1:20-cr-00074 (D.R.I.), Dkt. 31

Court filing

Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Staveley, No. 1:20-cr-00074 (D.R.I.), Dkt. 31

Summary

Form AO 472, Order of Detention Pending Trial, as to David Staveley, Doc. 31 in No. 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA, filed September 21, 2020. The form states that the Court held a detention hearing and found that detention is warranted. Its parts cover eligibility for detention, rebuttable presumptions, and an analysis and statement of the reasons for detention. In the line for other reasons, it states that the defendant violated conditions of pretrial release. Part IV remands the defendant to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement and provides for private consultation with defense counsel, and the form is dated 09/21/2020 above a United States Magistrate Judge signature line.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Same document as Order of detention pending trial — US v. Staveley/Butziger in Court filings.

Cite this document

“Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Staveley, No. 1:20-cr-00074 (D.R.I.), Dkt. 31.” Original at ecf.rid.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/ppp-attempt-conspiracy-legal-filings/undated-gov-uscourts-rid-49679-31-0-gov-uscourts-rid-49679-31-0/, SHA-256 26a04f0aeaa70d5a577e2dfeccdbf423cd8506f055539a4551a7813bd61be0b3.

Full text

       Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA Document 31 Filed 09/21/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 147

AO 472 (Rev. 11/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial


                                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                                                     for the
                                                           District of
                                                       __________      Rhode
                                                                   District of Island
                                                                                __________

                   United States of America                             )
                              v.                                        )
                       DAVID STAVELEY
                                                                        )      Case No.      CR No. 20-00074-MSM
                                                                        )
                              Defendant                                 )

                                        ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
                                                        Part I - Eligibility for Detention

     Upon the

               ✔ Motion of the Government attorney pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1), or
               u
               u Motion of the Government or Court’s own motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2),

the Court held a detention hearing and found that detention is warranted. This order sets forth the Court’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), in addition to any other findings made at the hearing.

                             Part II - Findings of Fact and Law as to Presumptions under § 3142(e)

  u A. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2) (previous violator): There is a rebuttable
    presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person
    and the community because the following conditions have been met:
         u (1) the defendant is charged with one of the following crimes described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1):
             u (a) a crime of violence, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, or an offense listed in 18 U.S.C.
                § 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed; or
             u (b) an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death; or
             u (c) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the
                Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act
                (21 U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 of Title 46, U.S.C. (46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508); or
             u (d) any felony if such person has been convicted of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs
                (a) through (c) of this paragraph, or two or more State or local offenses that would have been offenses
                described in subparagraphs (a) through (c) of this paragraph if a circumstance giving rise to Federal
                jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses; or
             u (e) any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence but involves:
                (i) a minor victim; (ii) the possession of a firearm or destructive device (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921);
                (iii) any other dangerous weapon; or (iv) a failure to register under 18 U.S.C. § 2250; and
         u (2) the defendant has previously been convicted of a Federal offense that is described in 18 U.S.C.
           § 3142(f)(1), or of a State or local offense that would have been such an offense if a circumstance giving rise
           to Federal jurisdiction had existed; and
         u (3) the offense described in paragraph (2) above for which the defendant has been convicted was
           committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a Federal, State, or local offense; and
         u (4) a period of not more than five years has elapsed since the date of conviction, or the release of the
           defendant from imprisonment, for the offense described in paragraph (2) above, whichever is later.

                                                                                                                   Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA Document 31 Filed 09/21/20 Page 2 of 3 PagelD #: 148

AO 472 (Rev. 11/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial

OB. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3) (narcotics, firearm, other offenses): There is a

rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the
defendant as required and the safety of the community because there is probable cause to believe that the defendant
committed one or more of the following offenses:

1 (1) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the

Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21
U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 of Title 46, U.S.C. (46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508);

C1 (2) an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b;

© (3) an offense listed in 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years
or more is prescribed;

C1 (4) an offense under Chapter 77 of Title 18, U.S.C. (18 U.S.C. §§ 1581-1597) for which a maximum term of
imprisonment of 20 years or more is prescribed; or

C1 (5) an offense involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(1), 2245,
2251, 2251A, 2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(1), 2252A(a)(2), 2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4),
2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425.

OC. Conclusions Regarding Applicability of Any Presumption Established Above

1 The defendant has not introduced sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption above, and detention is
ordered on that basis. (Part III need not be completed.)

OR

1 The defendant has presented evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption, but after considering the
presumption and the other factors discussed below, detention is warranted.

Part III - Analysis and Statement of the Reasons for Detention

After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) and the information presented at the detention hearing,
the Court concludes that the defendant must be detained pending trial because the Government has proven:

1 By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
the safety of any other person and the community.

wm By a preponderance of evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
the defendant’s appearance as required.

In addition to any findings made on the record at the hearing, the reasons for detention include the following:

M Weight of evidence against the defendant is strong

M1 Subject to lengthy period of incarceration if convicted

MI Prior criminal history

1 Participation in criminal activity while on probation, parole, or supervision
1 History of violence or use of weapons

1 History of alcohol or substance abuse

1 Lack of stable employment

1 Lack of stable residence

1 Lack of financially responsible sureties

Page 2 of 3
        Case 1:20-cr-00074-MSM-LDA Document 31 Filed 09/21/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 149

AO 472 (Rev. 11/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial

        u Lack of significant community or family ties to this district
        u Significant family or other ties outside the United States
        u Lack of legal status in the United States
        u Subject to removal or deportation after serving any period of incarceration
        ✔ Prior failure to appear in court as ordered
        u
        ✔ Prior attempt(s) to evade law enforcement
        u
        ✔ Use of alias(es) or false documents
        u
        u Background information unknown or unverified
        ✔ Prior violations of probation, parole, or supervised release
        u

OTHER REASONS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION:
 Defendant violated his conditions of pretrial release.




                                                 Part IV - Directions Regarding Detention

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the Attorney General or to the Attorney General’s designated representative for
confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being
held in custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with
defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in
charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in
connection with a court proceeding.

Date:                 09/21/2020
                                                                              United States Magistrate Judge




                                                                                                                     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.rid.49679.31.0.pdf
Size
226,263 bytes
SHA-256
26a04f0aeaa70d5a577e2dfeccdbf423cd8506f055539a4551a7813bd61be0b3
Our copy
gov.uscourts.rid.49679.31.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top