Court filing

Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related — OTO Analytics v. Benworth (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)

Summary

An administrative motion under Civil Local Rules 3-12 and 7-11, filed 08/12/24 as Document 38 in Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, by Benworth Capital Partners, LLC, respondent in Womply's petition to confirm an arbitration award. Benworth asks the court to consider whether its own action, Benworth Capital Partners, LLC v. Oto Analytics, LLC, No. 3:24-cv-04840, filed August 7, 2024 to vacate the award, should be related to the confirmation action filed July 1, 2024. Both concern the award in JAMS Ref. No. 1210038203. Benworth argues relating them would avoid duplication of labor and expense and conflicting results. It is signed /s/ Simon S. Grille of Girard Sharp LLP.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed August 12, 2024 in Oto Analytics v. Benworth; one of 111 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed	2024-08-12

Cite this document

“Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related — OTO Analytics v. Benworth (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, Doc. 38, filed 2024-08-12. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/oto-analytics-v-benworth/2024-08-12-administrative-motion-to-relate-cases/, SHA-256 4a7070b830eb50c0a4411f17ffba02e38c24c35c9fcad0ab3d17e8db93ace948.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 3-12 AND 7-11 
Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Daniel C. Girard (State Bar No. 114826) 
dgirard@girardsharp.com 
Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914) 
sgrille@girardsharp.com  
GIRARD SHARP LLP  
601 California Street, Suite 1400  
San Francisco, CA 94108  
Telephone: (415) 981-4800 
 
Jorge L. Piedra (Florida Bar No. 88315) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
jpiedra@kttlaw.com  
Dwayne A. Robinson (Florida Bar No. 99976) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
drobinson@kttlaw.com  
Michael R. Lorigas (Florida Bar No. 123597) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
mlorigas@kttlaw.com  
KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON  
2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor  
Miami, Florida 33134  
Telephone: (305) 372-1800 
 
Attorneys for Benworth Capital Partners, LLC 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC f/k/a OTO 
ANALYTICS, INC. d/b/a WOMPLY, 
 
 
 
Petitioner, 
 
v. 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, 
 
 
 
Respondent. 
 
Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD 
BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL 
LOCAL RULES 3-12 AND 7-11 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 38     Filed 08/12/24     Page 1 of 4

 
1 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 3-12 AND 7-11 
Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 3-12 and 7-11 of the Northern 
District of California, Respondent, Benworth Capital Partners, files this administrative motion to 
consider whether Benworth Capital Partners, LLC v. Oto Analytics, LLC, No. 3:24-cv-04840 (N.D. Cal.) 
(the “Vacatur Action”), filed on August 7, 2024 by the undersigned counsel, should be related to the 
first-filed action, Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners, LLC, No. 3:24-cv-3975 (N.D. Cal.) 
(the “Confirmation Action”), filed on July 1, 2024 by counsel for Oto Analytics.  
Civil Local Rule 3-12 provides that “[a]n action is related to another when: (1) The actions 
concern substantially the same parties, property, transaction or event; and (2) It appears likely that there 
will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the cases are 
conducted before different Judges.” Both cases involve the award issued following the JAMS arbitration 
styled Oto Analytics, Inc. v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC, JAMS Ref. No. 1210038203 (the 
“Arbitration Award”). As implied by the defined terms, the Vacatur Action seeks to vacate the 
Arbitration Award while the Confirmation Action seeks to confirm the Arbitration Award. Thus, each 
action will require adjudication of the same or substantially similar questions of law and fact. 
Under these circumstances, separate assignment of these actions would likely create a 
duplication of labor and expenses and potentially lead to conflicting results. Relating these actions, on 
the other hand, would conserve judicial resources and ensure consistent results. The parties and the Court 
will benefit from these efficiencies should the Court find these actions to be related. 
 
Dated: August 12, 2024 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
/s/ Simon S. Grille 
 
 
 
Daniel C. Girard (State Bar No. 114826)  
dgirard@girardsharp.com 
Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914)  
sgrille@girardsharp.com  
GIRARD SHARP LLP  
601 California Street, Suite 1400  
San Francisco, CA 94108  
Telephone: (415) 981-4800 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 38     Filed 08/12/24     Page 2 of 4

 
2 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 3-12 AND 7-11 
Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jorge L. Piedra (Florida Bar No. 88315) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
jpiedra@kttlaw.com 
Dwayne A. Robinson (Florida Bar No. 99976)  
(Pro Hac Vice) 
drobinson@kttlaw.com  
Michael R. Lorigas (Florida Bar No. 123597) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
mlorigas@kttlaw.com 
KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON 
2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor 
Miami, Florida 33134  
Telephone: (305) 372-1800  
 
Attorneys for Benworth Capital Partners, LLC  
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 38     Filed 08/12/24     Page 3 of 4

 
3 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 3-12 AND 7-11 
Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) 
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that concurrence in the 
filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories above. 
 
Dated: August 12, 2024 
/s/ Simon S. Grille 
 
 
Simon S. Grille 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 38     Filed 08/12/24     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.cand.431982.38.0.pdf
Size: 169,163 bytes
SHA-256: 4a7070b830eb50c0a4411f17ffba02e38c24c35c9fcad0ab3d17e8db93ace948
Our copy: gov.uscourts.cand.431982.38.0.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)