Court filing
Motion to seal — debtors (Williams and Evans declaration exhibits) — In re KServicing
Record facts
| Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-12-09 |
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware · No. 22-10951 · Doc. 351 · 2022-12-09 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
The debtors' motion for an order authorizing them to file under seal certain exhibits to the declarations supporting their motion to enforce, filed December 9, 2022 as Doc 351 in the jointly administered Chapter 11 cases of Kabbage, Inc. d/b/a KServicing, et al., Case No. 22-10951 (CTG), in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. The motion concerns Exhibits 2, 3, and 4 to the Williams Declaration and Exhibit 7 to the Evans Declaration, filed in support of the debtors' motion to enforce the Settlement Order and Settlement Agreement with Customers Bank. It states those exhibits contain bank account information of the Company and Customers Bank and personal information about PPP borrowers. It relies on 11 U.S.C. § 107(b)(1), 11 U.S.C. § 107(c)(1)(A) and Local Rule 9018-1(d), and sets a hearing for January 6, 2023.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
RLF1 28328895v.1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
------------------------------------------------------------ x
In re
:
Chapter 11
:
KABBAGE, INC. d/b/a KSERVICING, et al., :
Case No. 22-10951 (CTG)
:
:
:
:
(Jointly Administered)
Hearing Date: January 6, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. (ET)
Debtors.1
:
:
Obj. Deadline: December 23, 2022 at 4:00 p.m.
(ET)
------------------------------------------------------------ x
Re: Docket Nos. 340, 341, 342, 343 & 344
DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER
AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN
EXHIBITS TO THE DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO ENFORCE
Kabbage, Inc. d/b/a KServicing (the “Company”) and its debtor affiliates, as
debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases (collectively, the
“Debtors”), respectfully represent as follows in support of this motion (the “Motion”):
Relief Requested
1.
By this Motion, the Debtors request, pursuant to sections 105 and 107 of
title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 9018 of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), and Rule 9018-1 of the Local Rules of
Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware (the “Local Rules”), entry of an order authorizing the Debtors to file under seal the
Confidential Information (as defined below) contained in certain of the exhibits (the “Exhibits”)
1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification
number, as applicable are: Kabbage, Inc. d/b/a KServicing (3937); Kabbage Canada Holdings, LLC (N/A); Kabbage
Asset Securitization LLC (N/A); Kabbage Asset Funding 2017-A LLC (4803); Kabbage Asset Funding 2019-A
LLC (8973); and Kabbage Diameter, LLC (N/A). Kabbage is a trademark of American Express used under license;
Kabbage, Inc. d/b/a KServicing is not affiliated with American Express. The Debtors’ mailing and service address
is 925B Peachtree Street NE, Suite 383, Atlanta, GA 30309.
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 351 Filed 12/09/22 Page 1 of 8
- 2 -
RLF1 28328895v.1
attached to (i) the Declaration of Tamica M. Williams in Support of Motion of Debtors for Entry
of an Order Enforcing the Settlement Order and the Settlement Agreement Between KServicing
and Customers Bank [Docket No. 341] (the “Williams Declaration”) and (ii) the Declaration of
Donna R. Evans in Support of Motion of Debtors for Entry of an Order Enforcing the Settlement
Order and the Settlement Agreement Between KServicing and Customers Bank [Docket No. 342]
(the “Evans Declaration” and together with the Williams Declaration, the “Declarations”),
which were filed under seal.
2.
A proposed form of order granting the relief requested herein is annexed
hereto as Exhibit A (the “Proposed Order”).
Jurisdiction
3.
The Court has jurisdiction to consider this matter pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, and the Amended Standing Order of Reference from the United States
District Court for the District of Delaware, dated February 29, 2012. This is a core proceeding
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b). Pursuant to Local Rule 9013-1(f), the Debtors consent to the
entry of a final order by the Court in connection with this Motion to the extent it is later determined
that the Court, absent consent of the parties, cannot enter final orders or judgments consistent with
Article III of the United States Constitution. Venue is proper before the Court pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409.
Background
A.
General Background
4.
On October 3, 2022 (the “Petition Date”), the Debtors each commenced
with this Court a voluntary case under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (collectively, the
“Chapter 11 Cases”). The Debtors are authorized to continue to operate their business as debtors
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 351 Filed 12/09/22 Page 2 of 8
- 3 -
RLF1 28328895v.1
in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. No trustee,
examiner, or statutory committee of creditors has been appointed in these Chapter 11 Cases.
5.
Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b), the Chapter 11 Cases are being
jointly administered under the above captioned case.
6.
Additional information regarding the Debtors’ businesses, capital structure,
and the circumstances leading to the commencement of these Chapter 11 Cases is set forth in the
Declaration of Deborah Rieger-Paganis in Support of Debtors’ Chapter 11 Petitions and First
Day Relief [Docket No. 13].
B.
Specific Background
7.
On October 27, 2022, the Debtors filed the Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an
Order (I) Authorizing and Approving the Settlement Agreement Between KServicing and
Customers Bank and (II) Granting Related Relief [Docket No. 172] (the “9019 Motion”), seeking
approval of a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) between the Company and
Customers Bank (“CB”).
8.
On November 9, 2022, the Court entered an order approving the relief
requested in the 9019 Motion [Docket No. 232] (the “Settlement Order”).
9.
On December 7, 2022, the Debtors filed the Motion of Debtors for Entry of
an Order Enforcing the Settlement Order and the Settlement Agreement Between KServicing and
Customers Bank [Docket No. 340] (the “Motion to Enforce”), seeking to, among other things,
enforce the Settlement Order and the Settlement Agreement. In addition, the Debtors filed the
Declarations in support of the Motion to Enforce.
10.
Exhibits 2, 3, and 4 to the Williams Declaration and Exhibit 7 to the Evans
Declaration contain commercial information, including the Company’s and CB’s bank account
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 351 Filed 12/09/22 Page 3 of 8
- 4 -
RLF1 28328895v.1
information, and personally identifiable information related to certain of the Debtors’ borrowers
(the “Borrowers,” and the sensitive information discussed in this paragraph, the “Confidential
Information”). As a result, the Debtors have filed this Motion seeking authority to (i) file the
Confidential Information under seal and (ii) file versions of the Declarations redacting the
Confidential Information contained in the Exhibits.
Basis for Relief
11.
Sections 105(a) and 107 of the Bankruptcy Code allow the Court to
authorize parties to file confidential information under seal. Pursuant to section 105(a) of the
Bankruptcy Code, bankruptcy courts have the inherent equitable power to “issue any order,
process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title.” 11
U.S.C. § 105(a).
12.
Section 107(b)(1) provides bankruptcy courts with the power to protect
parties in interest from potentially harmful disclosures:
On request of a party in interest, the bankruptcy court shall, and on
the bankruptcy court’s own motion, the bankruptcy court may—
(1) protect an entity with respect to a trade secret or confidential
research, development, or commercial information . . . .
11 U.S.C. § 107(b)(1).
13.
In addition, section 107(c)(1)(A) provides bankruptcy courts with the power
to protect individuals from potentially harmful disclosures:
The bankruptcy court, for cause, may protect an individual, with
respect to the following types of information to the extent the court
finds that disclosure of such information would create undue risk of
identity theft or other unlawful injury to the individual or the
individual’s property:
(A) Any means of identification (as defined in section 1028(d) of
title 18) contained in a paper filed, or to be filed, in a case under this
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 351 Filed 12/09/22 Page 4 of 8
- 5 -
RLF1 28328895v.1
title.
11 U.S.C. § 107(c)(1)(A).
14.
Further, Local Rule 9018-1(d) provides, in relevant part, that “[a]ny party
who seeks to file documents under seal must file a motion to that effect.” Del. Bankr. L.R. 9018-
1(d).
15.
Once the court determines that a party in interest is seeking protection of
information that falls within one of the categories enumerated in section 107(b) of the Bankruptcy
Code, “the court is required to protect a requesting interested party and has no discretion to deny
the application.” Video Software Dealers Ass’n v. Orion Pictures Corp. (In re Orion Pictures
Corp.), 21 F.3d 24, 27 (2d Cir. 1994). Courts have held that protection under section 107(b) must
be granted if the information sought to be protected is commercial information, and significantly,
that commercial information need not rise to the level of a trade secret to be entitled to protection.
Id. at 28 (finding that the use of the disjunctive in section 107(b)(1) “neither equates ‘trade secret’
with ‘commercial information’ nor requires the latter to reflect the same level of confidentiality as
the former”). Furthermore, in contrast with Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
section 107(b) of the Bankruptcy Code does not require an entity seeking such protection to
demonstrate “good cause.” Orion Pictures Corp., 21 F.3d at 28. Nor does such require a finding
of “extraordinary circumstances or compelling need.” Id. at 27.
16.
Rather, a party seeking the protection of section 107(b) need only
demonstrate that the information is “confidential” and “commercial” in nature. Id. at 27; see also
In re Global Crossing Ltd., 295 B.R. 720, 725 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003) (recognizing that the
purpose of Bankruptcy Rule 9018 is to “protect business entities from disclosure of information
that could reasonably be expected to cause the entity commercial injury”). Once established that
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 351 Filed 12/09/22 Page 5 of 8
- 6 -
RLF1 28328895v.1
the subject information qualifies as “commercial information” under section 107(b)(1), the
Bankruptcy Code mandates that this information be protected from disclosure. See Global
Crossing Ltd., 295 B.R. at 725.
17.
The Debtors submit that sufficient cause exists for the Court to grant the
relief requested herein. As set forth above, certain of the Exhibits contain the bank account
information of both the Company and CB and the disclosure of such account information may
adversely affect the Debtors and/or CB. Accordingly, the Debtors submit such Confidential
Information falls within the scope of “confidential information” that must be protected pursuant to
section 107(b)(1).
18.
In addition, certain Exhibits contain personal information related to PPP
loans serviced by the Debtors, including the names of Borrowers and the status of the Borrowers’
loans. The Debtors believe that disclosure of such information could cause unnecessary harm to
the individual Borrowers.
19.
In light of the foregoing, the Debtors submit that the Confidential
Information falls within the scope of “confidential”, “commercial” and “personal” information that
must be protected pursuant to section 107 of the Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, the Debtors
respectfully request that the Court authorize the Debtors to (i) file the Confidential Information
under seal and (ii) file versions of the Declarations redacting the Confidential Information
contained in the Exhibits.
Compliance with Local Rule 9018-1(d)
20.
To the best of the knowledge, information, and belief of the undersigned
counsel to the Debtors, the Confidential Information that the Debtors are requesting to seal
pursuant to the relief requested in this Motion (other than the Debtors’ bank account information)
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 351 Filed 12/09/22 Page 6 of 8
- 7 -
RLF1 28328895v.1
contains information subject to the Confidentiality Rights of another Holder of Confidentiality
Rights (each as defined in Local Rule 9018-1(d)(iii)). Prior to filing this Motion, counsel to the
Debtors contacted counsel to CB regarding the relief requested herein and understands that CB
does not oppose the requested relief.
21.
Due to the large number of Borrowers whose Confidential Information may
be included in the Exhibits, the Debtors believe it is futile and/or impractical for them to confer
with such Borrowers regarding the relief requested herein prior to the filing of this Motion.
Notice
22.
Notice of this Motion will be provided to (a) the Office of the United States
Trustee for the District of Delaware; (b) the holders of the thirty (30) largest unsecured claims
against the Debtors on a consolidated basis; (c) the Federal Reserve Bank; (d) CB; (e) Cross River
Bank; (f) the United States Department of Justice; (g) the Federal Trade Commission; (h) the Small
Business Administration; (i) the Internal Revenue Service; (j) the Securities and Exchange
Commission; (k) the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Delaware; and (l) any party
that has requested notice pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002. The Debtors believe that no further
notice is required.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 351 Filed 12/09/22 Page 7 of 8
- 8 -
RLF1 28328895v.1
WHEREFORE, the Debtors request that the Court enter the Proposed Order, substantially
in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, granting the relief requested in the Motion and such other
and further relief as may be just and proper.
Dated: December 9, 2022
Wilmington, Delaware
/s/ Matthew P. Milana
RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
Daniel J. DeFranceschi, Esq. (No. 2732)
Amanda R. Steele (No. 5530)
Zachary I. Shapiro (No. 5103)
Matthew P. Milana (No. 6681)
One Rodney Square
920 North King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Telephone: (302) 651-7700
E-mail: defranceschi@rlf.com
steele@rlf.com
shapiro@rlf.com
milana@rlf.com
-and-
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)
Candace M. Arthur (admitted pro hac vice)
Natasha S. Hwangpo (admitted pro hac vice)
Chase A. Bentley (admitted pro hac vice)
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10153
Telephone:
(212) 310-8000
E-mail:
ray.schrock@weil.com
candace.arthur@weil.com
natasha.hwangpo@weil.com
chase.bentley@weil.com
Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 351 Filed 12/09/22 Page 8 of 8File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.deb.188293.351.0.pdf
- Size
- 378,111 bytes
- SHA-256
- 12a8b3926cf08023198730b410b92033095f7f7fe3c4ffb820b801bea8177a1f
- Original
- archive.org