Exhibit 5 — In re Carvana Securities

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · No. 2:22-cv-02126-MTL · Doc. 364-5 · 2026-04-27 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

EXHIBIT 5 
Case 2:22-cv-02126-MTL     Document 364-5     Filed 04/27/26     Page 1 of 2

1
Sarah Fallon
From:
Natalie.Salazar@lw.com
Sent:
Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:03 PM
To:
Sarah Fallon; Christian.Word@LW.com; Tor Gronborg; Matthew.Peters@lw.com; 
Kalana.Kariyawasam@lw.com; Meryn.Grant@lw.com
Cc:
Erika Oliver; Dan Drosman; Rachel Cocalis; Jeff.Hammel@lw.com; Mathew Andrews; 
Scott Dion; John Eastly
Subject:
RE: Carvana
Attachments:
2026.02.12 Carvana Defendants Categorical Privilege Log.xlsx
EXTERNAL SENDER  
Counsel,  
Attached is an initial privilege log which reflects responsive documents and communications that are protected in whole 
or in part by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Carvana reserves the right to amend and 
supplement the privilege log and will provide additional logs on a rolling basis.  
Thank you, 
Natalie R. Salazar 
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers 
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 
330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800 
Chicago, IL 60611 
Direct Dial: +1.312.777.7106 
Email: natalie.salazar@lw.com 
https://www.lw.com 
From: Sarah Fallon <SFallon@rgrdlaw.com>  
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:07 AM 
To: Word, Christian (DC) <Christian.Word@LW.com>; Tor Gronborg <TorG@rgrdlaw.com>; Peters, Matthew (DC) 
<Matthew.Peters@lw.com>; Kariyawasam, Kalana (NY) <Kalana.Kariyawasam@lw.com> 
Cc: Erika Oliver <EOliver@rgrdlaw.com>; Dan Drosman <DanD@rgrdlaw.com>; Salazar, Natalie (CH) 
<Natalie.Salazar@lw.com>; Rachel Cocalis <RCocalis@rgrdlaw.com>; Hammel, Jeff (NY) <Jeff.Hammel@lw.com>; 
Mathew Andrews <MAndrews@rgrdlaw.com>; Scott Dion <SDion@rgrdlaw.com> 
Subject: RE: Carvana 
Christian, 
We have still not received any additional privilege logs from the Carvana Defendants. As Plaintiffs have explained, the 
production of these logs cannot be put off any longer. For example, Plaintiffs cannot schedule any depositions without 
having the opportunity to review all corresponding privilege log entries for a given deponent. Given that you have 
estimated a 102,372-entry log, Plaintiffs will need a substantial amount of time to review its entries. Please confirm that 
you will immediately begin providing rolling privilege logs. Barring that confirmation, we will promptly seek relief from 
the Court.  
Thanks, 
Sarah 
Case 2:22-cv-02126-MTL     Document 364-5     Filed 04/27/26     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.azd.1319766.364.5.pdf

Size

238,155 bytes

SHA-256

26f6c6bd1bb8ae903e0907fd744795354cbbb47eab62653f72fa9898123e4cb7

Our copy

gov.uscourts.azd.1319766.364.5.pdf

Original

archive.org