Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc. v. XLD Century LLC case — U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. Judgment — United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc. v. XLD Century LLC, Case No. 2:22-CV-05514-SB-PVC (Document 119)

Court filing

Judgment — United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc. v. XLD Century LLC, Case No. 2:22-CV-05514-SB-PVC (Document 119)

Summary

A Final Judgment in United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc. v. XLD Century LLC et al., Case No. 2:22-CV-05514-SB-PVC, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, dated August 8, 2024 and signed by District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The judgment recounts the relator's allegation that XLD Century LLC and XLD Group LLC were ineligible to receive $4 million in PPP loans because of ownership by Sichuan Xinglida, and the bench trial on scienter of July 11, 2024. It adjudges that the relator failed to carry its burden and is not entitled to recover. Judgment is entered for the defendants and the claim is dismissed on the merits with prejudice.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed August 8, 2024 in United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc. v. XLD Century LLC; one of 11 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Filed2024-08-08

Cite this document

“Judgment — United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc. v. XLD Century LLC, Case No. 2:22-CV-05514-SB-PVC (Document 119).” U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:22-cv-05514, Doc. 119, filed 2024-08-08. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-xld-century-llc-cacd-859554/2024-08-08-gov-uscourts-cacd-859554-119-0-doc-119/, SHA-256 421e1af3f71dc14a9345bb8c399dbb3f2effef6d8e6191f3603143b64910fec7.

Full text

Case 2:22-cv-05514-SB-PVC Document 119 Filed 08/08/24 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:991




1
2
3
4
5                                         JS-6
6
7
                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9                    FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10    United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc., ) Case No.: 2:22-CV-05514-SB-PVC
11                                      )
                    Plaintiff,          )
12                                      )
13          vs.                         ) FINAL JUDGMENT
                                        )
14
      XLD CENTURY LLC et al.,           )
15                                      )
16                Defendants.           )
                                        )
17                                      )
18
19          Plaintiff United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc. (Relator) filed this False Claims
20    Act (FCA) lawsuit, alleging that Defendants XLD Century LLC and XLD Group
21    LLC were ineligible to receive $4 million in Paycheck Protection Program loans
22    because they were both ultimately owned by Sichuan Xinglida, a Chinese entity.
23    The Court granted in part Relator’s motion for summary judgment, finding that
24    Relator had proved falsity, materiality, and causation, but found a triable issue of
25
      material fact as to scienter.
26
            On July 11, 2024, the Court held a bench trial to determine whether Relator
27
      could establish the element of scienter. Relator appeared by its attorney David
28
      Abrams, and Defendants appeared by their attorney Dana Moon. After evaluating


                                                1

     Case 2:22-cv-05514-SB-PVC Document 119 Filed 08/08/24 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:992




1     the evidence at trial and considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court
2     issues the final judgment as follows:
3
4     THE COURT HEREBY ADJUDGES, ORDERS AND DECREES AS
5     FOLLOWS:
6        1. Relator has failed to carry its burden and is not entitled to recover on its
7
            FCA claim;
8
         2. Judgment is awarded in favor of Defendants and against Relator; and
9
         3. Relator’s claim against Defendants is hereby dismissed on the merits with
10
            prejudice.
11
12
         IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
      Date: August 8, 2024                           ___________________________
15                                                         Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.
16                                                       United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


                                                 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cacd.859554.119.0.pdf
Size
129,656 bytes
SHA-256
421e1af3f71dc14a9345bb8c399dbb3f2effef6d8e6191f3603143b64910fec7
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cacd.859554.119.0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top