Court filing
Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc. (Dkt. 32.1)
Summary
A Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording, Document 32-1, from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc., filed November 16, 2020. It states that the case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project under General Order 65, and that the parties' consent is required before any proceedings may be recorded. If a party, the presiding judge or a member of the media requests recording, consent is presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form. Parties who object are asked to tell the Court their reasons for research purposes, and the notice says the choice has no effect on the case. It is signed by Clerk of Court Susan Y. Soong.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2020-11-16 |
Cite this document
“Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc. (Dkt. 32.1).”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:20-cv-07810-JSW, Doc. 32-1, filed 2020-11-16. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-us-visa-plaid-cand-18607870/2020-11-16-gov-uscourts-cand-368439-32-1-gov-uscourts-cand-368439-32-1/
, SHA-256 afe04c2237f0c0431d123ea2e3b5ba52a57226469ab215b7ada394bb5ffe6e09.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VIDEO RECORDING This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. The parties’ consent is required before any proceedings in this case may be recorded. If a party, the presiding judge, or a member of the media requests that a proceeding be recorded, consent of the parties will be presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form as directed by the Cameras in the Courtroom Procedures. Parties objecting to video recording are asked, for research purposes, to communicate to the Court the reasons for declining to participate. If you decline to participate, you should candidly convey the reasons for your decision. Whether you agree to participate or decline to participate will have no effect on your case whatsoever. Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court Case 4:20-cv-07810-JSW Document 32-1 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.368439.32.1.pdf
- Size
- 37,911 bytes
- SHA-256
- afe04c2237f0c0431d123ea2e3b5ba52a57226469ab215b7ada394bb5ffe6e09
- Original
- PACER (login required)