ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate,… — United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc. (Dkt. 32)

Summary

This is an Order Reassigning Case, Doc. 32, dated November 16, 2020, in United States of America v. Visa Inc., et al., Case No. 20-cv-07810-BLF, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It states that the case has been reassigned, using a proportionate, random and blind system under General Order No. 44, to the Honorable Jeffrey S. White in the OAKLAND division, and that future filings must bear the initials JSW after the case number. It vacates all hearing and trial dates presently scheduled, and says existing briefing schedules, ADR compliance deadlines and the discovery cutoff remain unchanged. The order carries the name of Clerk Susan Y. Soong.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
 
VISA INC., et al., 
Defendants. 
Case No.  20-cv-07810-BLF    
 
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE 
 
 
IT IS ORDERED that this case has been reassigned using a proportionate, random and 
blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to the Honorable Jeffrey S. White in the 
OAKLAND division for all further proceedings.  Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall 
bear the initials JSW immediately after the case number. 
All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated.  However, existing briefing 
schedules for motions remain unchanged.  Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge 
to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior 
briefing schedule.  Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also 
remain unchanged.  
Dated:  November 16, 2020 
 
 
 
 
Susan Y. Soong 
Clerk, United States District Court 
 
 
A true and correct copy of this order has been served by mail upon any pro se parties. 
Case 4:20-cv-07810-JSW   Document 32   Filed 11/16/20   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.368439.32.0.pdf

Size

36,159 bytes

SHA-256

1456961b5c6f7cc223b84b62d25048db52bd796b8f606ebf19003988bba68d14

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.368439.32.0.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com