ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate,… — United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc. (Dkt. 28)

Summary

An Order Reassigning Case, Document 28, dated November 12, 2020 in United States of America v. Visa Inc., et al., Case No. 20-cv-07810-KAW, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It states that the case was reassigned, using a proportionate, random and blind system under General Order No. 44, to the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman in the San Jose division for all further proceedings. Future filings must bear the initials BLF after the case number, and all hearing and trial dates are vacated, though briefing schedules and other deadlines such as ADR compliance and discovery cutoff stay unchanged. Motions must be renoticed before the new judge. It is signed by Clerk Susan Y. Soong.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
 
VISA INC., et al., 
Defendants. 
 
Case No.  20-cv-07810-KAW    
 
 
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE 
 
 
IT IS ORDERED that this case has been reassigned using a proportionate, random and 
blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman in the San 
Jose division for all further proceedings.  Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear 
the initials BLF immediately after the case number. 
All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated.  However, existing briefing 
schedules for motions remain unchanged.  Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge 
to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior 
briefing schedule.  Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also 
remain unchanged.  
Dated:  November 12, 2020 
 
 
 
 
Susan Y. Soong 
Clerk, United States District Court 
 
 
A true and correct copy of this order has been served by mail upon any pro se parties. 
Case 5:20-cv-07810-BLF   Document 28   Filed 11/12/20   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.368439.28.0.pdf

Size

27,881 bytes

SHA-256

17597e75145376e3d814bab6c59a8845b65c5c08fd603dedce1c0e73dc4feef8

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.368439.28.0.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com