Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc. — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc. (…

Court filing

Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc. (Dkt. 28.1)

Summary

A Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, filed November 12, 2020 as Document 28-1 in Case 4:20-cv-07810-JSW. The notice states that the case is assigned to a judge who takes part in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project under General Order 65, and that the parties' consent is presumed unless a party files an objection form. It is issued by Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2020-01-13

Cite this document

“Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc. (Dkt. 28.1).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:19-cv-08315-JD, Doc. 11-1, filed 2020-01-13. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-us-visa-plaid-cand-18607870/2020-01-13-gov-uscourts-cand-368439-28-1-gov-uscourts-cand-368439-28-1/, SHA-256 284a5907b50179f16f039aa1f983984948574f9d8e3f182496874e22daf7ed02.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NOTICE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VIDEO RECORDING
This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot 
Project.  See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.  The parties’ consent is required 
before any proceedings in this case may be recorded.  If a party, the presiding judge, or a 
member of the media requests that a proceeding be recorded, consent of the parties will be 
presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form as directed 
by the Cameras in the Courtroom Procedures.  
Parties objecting to video recording are asked, for research purposes, to communicate to 
the Court the reasons for declining to participate.  If you decline to participate, you should 
candidly convey the reasons for your decision.  Whether you agree to participate or decline to 
participate will have no effect on your case whatsoever.  
Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court
Susan Y Soong Clerk of C
Case 3:19-cv-08315-JD   Document 11-1   Filed 01/13/20   Page 1 of 1
Case 4:20-cv-07810-JSW     Document 28-1     Filed 11/12/20     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.368439.28.1.pdf
Size
49,466 bytes
SHA-256
284a5907b50179f16f039aa1f983984948574f9d8e3f182496874e22daf7ed02
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.368439.28.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top