Judgment — United States v. Shibley (Dkt. 170-1, W.D. Wash. No. 2:20-cr-00174)

Summary

A (proposed) order directing credit toward restitution obligation, or indicative ruling, in United States of America v. Eric Shibley, No. CR20-174 JCC, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, filed June 10, 2022 as Document 170-1 in Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC. Responding to the defense motion for clarification of restitution credit for forfeited funds, it would direct that monies the defendant forfeited under the court's January 21, 2022 order be credited toward the restitution ordered to aggrieved lenders in the Amended Judgment. As an alternative, it would indicate under Rule 37, because the judgment is on appeal, that the court would grant that relief on remand. The signature block for Judge John Coughenour is undated, and the form was presented by defense attorney Michael Nance.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Honorable John Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,      ) 
  
 
 
       )     No.  CR20-174 JCC 
    
Plaintiff, 
       ).    (proposed) 
 
 
 
       )     ORDER DIRECTING CREDIT  
    
 
v. 
 
 
       )     TOWARD RESTITUTION  
 
 
 
 
 
       )     OBLIGATION [OR INDICATIVE RULING] 
ERIC SHIBLEY, 
 
 
       )      
 
 
            
  
 
 
 
 
       )      
  
                     Defendant. 
       )     
_______________________________)   
The court has considered the Defense Motion for Clarification of Restitution 
Credit for Forfeited Funds or for an Indicative Ruling and any government response.  
——-  Good cause has been shown.  The Court directs that specific monies 
forfeited by the defendant to the government in its Order of January 21, 2022, be properly 
credited toward the restitution later ordered to aggrieved lenders identified in the 
Amended Judgment. [OR] 
______  Mindful that the judgment in this case is presently on appeal, the Court, 
pursuant to Rule 37, indicates that it would grant the relief indicated above if the case is 
remanded by the Court of Appeals for that purpose.   
1
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 170-1     Filed 06/10/22     Page 1 of 2

ORDERED this _____ day of June, 2022. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
__________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
John Coughenour 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. District Judge 
Presented  by: 
/s/ Michael Nance, WSBA #13933  
Defense Attorney 
2
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 170-1     Filed 06/10/22     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.wawd.290910.170.1.pdf

Size

62,578 bytes

SHA-256

cc261133198cbc30f4b6a19c6cb8102ad2b145cd196feab651dd7e7cfdae9b50

Our copy

gov.uscourts.wawd.290910.170.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)