Information — United States v. Shibley (Dkt. 29, W.D. Wash. No. 2:20-cr-00174)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington · No. 2:20-cr-00174-JCC · Doc. 29 · 2020-09-28 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

ORDER REVOKING BOND AND DETENTION 
ORDER - 1 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 
AT SEATTLE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
ERIC SHIBLEY, 
 
Defendant. 
Case No. MJ20-385 MLP 
ORDER REVOKING BOND AND 
DETENTION ORDER 
 
Offenses charged: 
Bond Violation  
Bond Revocation:  September 28, 2020 
On June 30, 2020, Defendant appeared for an initial appearance and detention hearing 
before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge after which Defendant was released on an 
appearance bond that included restrictions that he not commit any violations of law. 
On September 14 and 15, 2020, Probation and Pretrial Services filed Petitions for 
Warrant for Defendant, alleging that the Defendant violated the terms and conditions of his bond 
as follows: 
(1) Committing the crime of assault-domestic violence on or about September 12, 2020, 
in violation of a standard condition of pretrial services that he not commit a federal, 
state, or local crime during the period of release. 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 29     Filed 09/28/20     Page 1 of 3

 
ORDER REVOKING BOND AND DETENTION 
ORDER - 2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
(2) Committing the crime of assault-domestic violence on or about September 15, 2020, 
in violation of a standard condition of pretrial services that he not commit a federal, 
state, or local crime during the period of release. 
On September 28, 2020, Defendant made his appearance at a bond revocation hearing 
before the undersigned. He was previously advised of his rights in connection with the Petition 
for Warrant for Defendant and Report of Supplemental Violations. He was advised of the bond 
violation allegations. The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the new criminal law violations 
and found that there was probable cause to believe that Defendant committed a state crime while 
on release. 
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148(a)(1), and based upon the factual findings and statement of 
reasons for detention stated on the record, finds: 
FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION 
(1) 
Based on the exhibits provided by the government during the evidentiary hearing 
the Court found that there was sufficient evidence to support a probable cause finding that 
Defendant committed the crimes of domestic violence assault on September 12 and 15, 2020. 
(2) 
Defendant is alleged to committed the underlying crime and the two domestic 
violence assaults while on probation for violating a no contact/protection order. Defendant is 
alleged to have failed to appear for his appointments for domestic violation as required by his 
probation. Defendant’s criminal history appears to show that Defendant violated prior protection 
orders on at least four different occasions. Defendant appears to have provided misleading 
information to his pretrial service officer when questioned about the recent allegations of 
domestic violence assault.  
(3) 
The Court finds that given the Defendant’s past history of non-compliance with 
protection orders and failure to follow-up with domestic violence evaluations leads to a finding 
that the Defendant is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release 
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(B). The Court finds that there are no conditions or 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 29     Filed 09/28/20     Page 2 of 3

 
ORDER REVOKING BOND AND DETENTION 
ORDER - 3 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
combination of conditions that will reasonably assure that the Defendant is not a danger to his 
girlfriend or to other persons or the community. 
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 
(1) 
Defendant’s bond is hereby revoked; 
(2) 
Defendant shall be detained pending trial, and committed to the custody of the 
Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent 
practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody 
pending appeal; 
(2) 
Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with 
counsel; 
(3) 
On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 
government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which Defendant is 
confined shall deliver the Defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of 
an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and 
(4) 
The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to 
counsel for the Defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States 
Pretrial Services Officer. 
DATED this 28th day of September, 2020. 
 
A 
MICHELLE L. PETERSON 
United States Magistrate Judge 
 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 29     Filed 09/28/20     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.wawd.290910.29.0.pdf

Size

32,906 bytes

SHA-256

60d12c31156c587bdb6f9d058eb9b93aaf23858f162151319d7070ce184ca703

Our copy

gov.uscourts.wawd.290910.29.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)