Indictment — United States v. Shibley (Dkt. 60, W.D. Wash. No. 2:20-cr-00174)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington · No. 2:20-cr-00174-JCC · Doc. 60 · 2020-11-24 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

ORDER 
CR20-0174-JCC 
PAGE - 1 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 
AT SEATTLE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
ERIC SHIBLEY, 
 
Defendant. 
CASE NO. CR20-0174-JCC 
ORDER 
 
This matter comes before the Court on the Government’s motion for entry of a protective 
order restraining certain forfeitable property (Dkt. No. 41). Having thoroughly considered the 
motion and the relevant record, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. 
The Government seeks to restrain the following property: 
A. 
$49,500.86 in U.S. funds, seized on or about May 29, 2020 from Navy Federal 
Credit Union account #******7528, held in the name of Eric R. Shibley MD 
PLLC; 
B. 
$100,000.00 in U.S. funds, seized on or about May 29, 2020 from Wells Fargo 
account #******2378, held in the name of ES1 LLC;  
C. 
$804,816.63 in U.S. funds, seized on or about May 27, 2020 from Wells Fargo 
account #******3536, held in the name of The A Team Holdings LLC;  
D. 
$114,440.00 in U.S. funds, seized on or about June 30, 2020 from Verity Credit 
Union account #***5390, held in the name of Dituri Construction LLC; and 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 60     Filed 11/24/20     Page 1 of 2

 
ORDER 
CR20-0174-JCC 
PAGE - 2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
E. 
$114,743.59 in U.S. funds, seized on or about June 30, 2020 from Verity Credit 
Union account #***5320, held in the name of SS1 LLC. 
The Court, having reviewed the papers and pleadings filed in this matter, including the 
United States’ Motion and supporting Declaration of Federal Bureau of Investigation Special 
Agent (“SA”) Kathleen Moran, hereby FINDS entry of a protective order restraining the above-
identified property (hereafter, the “Subject Property”) is appropriate because: 
• The United States gave notice of its intent to pursue forfeiture in the Indictment (Dkt. 
No. 31) and the Forfeiture Bill of Particulars (Dkt. No. 39);  
• Based on the facts set forth in SA Moran’s Declaration, there is probable cause to 
believe the Subject Property is subject to forfeiture in this case; and 
• To ensure the Subject Property remains available for forfeiture, its continued 
restraint, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(e)(1), is appropriate. 
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COURT ORDERS:  
1. The United States’ request for a protective order restraining the Subject Property 
pending the conclusion of this case is GRANTED; and 
2. The Subject Property shall remain in the custody of the United States, and/or its 
authorized agents or representatives, pending the conclusion of criminal forfeiture 
proceedings and/or further order of this Court.   
DATED this 24th day of November 2020. 
A  
John C. Coughenour 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 60     Filed 11/24/20     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.wawd.290910.60.0.pdf

Size

32,585 bytes

SHA-256

8d6a31e7f58b1f8d4da4e3379e80c8eb885c62969817194ba8e973347e4ea39b

Our copy

gov.uscourts.wawd.290910.60.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)