Court filing
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 21)
No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO · Doc. 21 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
An Order Reassigning Case filed July 16, 2024 as Document 21 in Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC, Case No. 24-cv-03975-LJC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The order states that the case has been reassigned, using a proportionate, random and blind system under General Order No. 44, to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin in the San Francisco division for all further proceedings. Future filings are to bear the initials AMO after the case number. All scheduled hearing and trial dates are vacated, while existing briefing schedules, ADR compliance deadlines and discovery cutoffs remain unchanged, and motions must be renoticed before the new judge. The one-page order carries the name of Mark B. Busby, Clerk of the court.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO Document 21 Filed 07/16/24 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 OTO ANALYTICS, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-03975-LJC
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE
v.
9
10 BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC,
Defendant.
11
12
United States District Court
13 IT IS ORDERED that this case has been reassigned using a proportionate, random and
14 blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to the Honorable Araceli Martinez-Olguin in the
15 San Francisco division for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings
Northern District of California
16 shall bear the initials AMO immediately after the case number.
17 All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing
18 schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge
19 to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior
20 briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also
21 remain unchanged.
22 Dated: July 16, 2024
23
24
Mark B. Busby
25 Clerk, United States District Court
26
27
28
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.431982.21.0.pdf
- Size
- 29,945 bytes
- SHA-256
- abd3c11162372089cd2af89c92ca9f8ed5a11fd312b02252a85942045cca5308
- Original
- PACER (login required)