Court filing
LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Lewis J.… — USA v. Martinez (Dkt. 94)
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-12-22 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · No. 1:22-cr-00251-LJL · Doc. 94 · 2023-12-22 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
A letter motion dated December 22, 2023 from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Lewis J. Liman in United States v. Rafael Martinez, No. 1:22-cr-00251-LJL, filed as Document 94. The government asks the court to enter an attached Final Order of Forfeiture. The letter states that the defendant's interest in the Substitute Asset was forfeited under a Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Substitute Assets (Dkt. 73), and that a claim by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco to part of the asset was resolved by a Stipulation and Order (Dkt. 88). It states that no outstanding claims remain as to the Forfeitable Funds and the time to file has expired. The one-page letter is signed by Assistant United States Attorney Katherine Reilly.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
[Type text] December 22, 2023 Re: United States v. Rafael Martinez S2 22 Cr. 251 (LJL) Dear Judge Liman: The Government respectfully requests that the Court enter the attached Final Order of Forfeiture in this matter. As set forth in the accompanying Declaration, all right, title, and interest of the Defendant, Rafael Martinez, in the Substitute Asset was ordered forfeited pursuant to a Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Substitute Assets (Dkt. 73). The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (“FRB-SF”) asserted an interest to a portion of the Substitute Asset, and that claim was then resolved pursuant to a Stipulation and Order (Dkt. 88), whereby the Government agreed to return a portion of the Substitute Asset to FRB-SF, and FRB-SF agreed to withdraw any claim of interest to the remaining portion of the Substitute Asset (the “Forfeitable Funds”). There are no outstanding claims filed with respect to the Forfeitable Funds and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the Government respectfully requests that the Court enter the enclosed Final Order of Forfeiture. Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney Southern District of New York By: ___________________ Katherine Reilly Assistant United States Attorney Tel: (212) 637-6521 Enclosure The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew’s Plaza New York, New York 10007 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York VIA ECF The Honorable Lewis J. Liman United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 Case 1:22-cr-00251-LJL Document 94 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.nysd.579149.94.0.pdf
- Size
- 199,033 bytes
- SHA-256
- 935e8d3531933bcabc56dc3cb5ff1c99141668fae8db3517719801d13129580b
- Original
- PACER (login required)