Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Full Docket Martinez Sdny 1 22 Cr 00251 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Lewis J.… — USA v. Martinez (Dkt. 91)

Court filing

LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Lewis J.… — USA v. Martinez (Dkt. 91)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Filed2023-11-15

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · No. 1:22-cr-00251-LJL · Doc. 91 · 2023-11-15 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A letter motion dated November 15, 2023 and filed as Document 91 in United States v. Rafael Martinez, S2 22 Cr. 251 (LJL), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, addressed to the Honorable Lewis J. Liman. The government requests that the court enter the attached Final Order of Forfeiture in the matter. It states that, as set forth in the accompanying declaration, all right, title and interest of the defendant in the Specific Property was ordered forfeited pursuant to a Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment, Docket Entry 66, and that no third-party claims have been filed within the statutory period. The one-page letter asks that the enclosed order be entered so the United States Department of Treasury or its designee can dispose of the Specific Property according to law.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

[Type text] 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
November 15, 2023 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Re:  United States v. Rafael Martinez 
 
 
   S2 22 Cr. 251 (LJL)  
 
Dear Judge Liman: 
 
The Government respectfully requests that the Court enter the attached Final Order of 
Forfeiture in this matter.  As set forth in the accompanying Declaration, all right, title, and interest 
of the Defendant, Rafael Martinez, in the Specific Property was ordered forfeited pursuant to a 
Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment (Docket Entry 
66), and no third-party claims have been filed within the statutory period.  Accordingly, the 
enclosed Final Order of Forfeiture should be entered so that the United States Department of 
Treasury (or its designee) can dispose of the Specific Property according to law.  
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
DAMIAN WILLIAMS 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of New York 
 
 
By: ___________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Katherine Reilly 
Micah Fergenson 
Steven Kochevar 
Assistant United States Attorneys 
 
Tel: (212) 637-6521/2190(914) 993-1928 
 
 
Enclosure 
 
The Silvio J. Mollo Building 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
New York, New York 10007 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of New York 
VIA ECF  
 
The Honorable Lewis J. Liman 
United States District Judge 
Southern District of New York 
500 Pearl St. 
New York, NY 10007-1312 
Case 1:22-cr-00251-LJL     Document 91     Filed 11/15/23     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nysd.579149.91.0.pdf
Size
199,145 bytes
SHA-256
997eec7bfc1f0cc4b5fb46a8c33c7c716efeb70c6efd13e440f3408c214777a5
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nysd.579149.91.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top