Memorandum — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 162-1, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG · Doc. 162-1 · 2025-05-21 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 
 
 
ALICIA MARSHALL, et al.,  
 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs, 
 
 
 
v. 
 
PRESTAMOS CDFI, LLC, 
 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
 
 
 
Civil Action No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE JOINT 
APPENDIX IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR  
SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER SEAL 
 
 
Plaintiffs, though the undersigned counsel, respectfully submit this Brief in Support of 
their motion for leave to file their Joint Appendix in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for 
Summary Judgment Under Seal.  
I. 
Background 
On January 18, 2022, the Court granted the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of 
Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order (the “Protective Order”). See ECF No. 20. The 
Protective Order, inter alia, recognized that certain discovery material may contain information 
designated by a party to be Confidential or Highly Confidential and provided appropriate 
protections against the public disclosure of that information. 
On May 7, 2025, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment along with an 
Appendix in Support of their motion. See ECF Nos. 157 and 158. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to 
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, which is being filed concurrently herewith, 
identifies and explains the reasons why Defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be 
denied. Plaintiffs’ Opposition is supported by their Joint Appendix (the “Appendix”) containing 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 162-1     Filed 05/21/25     Page 1 of 4

 
2 
new evidence that Defendant’s motion omits in accordance with Local Rule 5.1.5 and the 
Court’s Policy and Procedure II. B. 5. Plaintiffs’ Appendix contains certain documents and 
information that have been designated as Confidential and/or Highly Confidential, such as tax 
documents, bank records, and other sensitive personal financial information. 
II. 
Argument 
The Court should grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Under Seal for the same 
reasons set forth in Prestamos’ motion to seal (ECF No. 156), which the Court granted. ECF No. 
160.  
III. 
Conclusion 
   Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ respectfully request that the Court grant Plaintiffs leave to file their 
Joint Appendix in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Under Seal. 
Dated: May 21, 2025 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
Bailey & Glasser LLP 
 
 
By: /s/ Lawrence J. Lederer 
 
Lawrence J. Lederer (Pa. ID 50445) 
Bart D. Cohen (Pa. ID 57606) 
1622 Locust Street 
Philadelphia, PA 19103 
T.: 202.463-2101 
F.: 202.463-2103 
llederer@baileyglasser.com  
bcohen@baileyglasser.com    
 
Bailey & Glasser LLP 
Michael L. Murphy (pro hac vice)  
1055 Thomas Jefferson Street NW, Suite 540 
Washington, DC 20007 
T.: 202.463-2101 
F.: 202.463-2103 
mmurphy@baileyglasser.com 
 
Whiteman Osterman & Hanna LLP 
Justin A. Heller (pro hac vice) 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 162-1     Filed 05/21/25     Page 2 of 4

 
3 
80 State Street, 11th Floor 
Albany, NY 12207 
T: (518) 487-7600 
F: (518) 432-3123 
jheller@woh.com  
 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs 
 
 
                                                            
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 162-1     Filed 05/21/25     Page 3 of 4

 
4 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that on the 21st day of May 2025, the foregoing was electronically filed 
and served through the Court’s CM/ECF system to counsel of record. 
/s/ Lawrence J. Lederer                      
 
Lawrence J. Lederer 
 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 162-1     Filed 05/21/25     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.162.1.pdf

Size

104,598 bytes

SHA-256

41d7397df44b1cc8576cfb8e77995a9ccae6e05a3a518e71b183ee1256f57239

Our copy

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.162.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)