Order — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Dkt. 33-1, C.D. Cal. No. 2:20-cr-00319)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-cr-00319-RGK · Doc. 33-1 · 2021-08-07 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TRACY L. WILKISON 
Acting United States Attorney 
SCOTT M. GARRINGER 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Chief, Criminal Division 
KERRY L. QUINN (Cal. Bar No. 302954) 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Major Frauds Section 
312 North Spring Street, 11th Floor 
Los Angeles, California 90012 
Telephone: (213) 894-5423 
Facsimile: (213) 894-6269 
E-mail: 
Kerry.L.Quinn@usdoj.gov 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
ANDREW MARNELL, 
 
Defendant. 
No. CR 20-319-RGK 
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL 
DATE AND FINDINGS REGARDING 
EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS PURSUANT 
TO SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 
[PROPOSED] TRIAL DATE: 09-21-2021 
 
The Court has read and considered the Stipulation Regarding 
Request for (1) Continuance of Trial Date and (2) Findings of 
Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act, filed by the 
parties in this matter on August 7, 2021.  The Court hereby finds 
that the Stipulation, which this Court incorporates by reference into 
this Order, demonstrates facts that support a continuance of the 
trial date in this matter, and provides good cause for a finding of 
excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. 
The Court further finds that:  (i) the ends of justice served by 
the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and 
defendant in a speedy trial; (ii) failure to grant the continuance 
Case 2:20-cr-00319-RGK     Document 33-1     Filed 08/07/21     Page 1 of 2   Page ID
#:206

 
 
2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
would be likely to make a continuation of the proceeding impossible, 
or result in a miscarriage of justice; and (iii) failure to grant the 
continuance would unreasonably deny defendant continuity of counsel 
and would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for 
effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 
diligence. 
THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN: 
1. 
The trial in this matter is continued from August 24, 2021 
to September 21, 2021.  
2. 
The time period of August 24, 2021, to September 21, 2021, 
inclusive, is excluded in computing the time within which the trial 
must commence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(i), 
and (B)(iv).  
3. 
Nothing in this Order shall preclude a finding that other 
provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time 
periods are excluded from the period within which trial must 
commence.  Moreover, the same provisions and/or other provisions of 
the Speedy Trial Act may in the future authorize the exclusion of 
additional time periods from the period within which trial must 
commence. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
 
 
 
 
DATE 
 
HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
Presented by: 
     /s/ 
KERRY L. QUINN 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00319-RGK     Document 33-1     Filed 08/07/21     Page 2 of 2   Page ID
#:207

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cacd.790198.33.1.pdf

Size

109,677 bytes

SHA-256

5e593d05016f252acd4996bd0951ee19b028c2d20538688977af735bdc41ad50

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cacd.790198.33.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)