Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Andrew Marnell PPP fraud case — U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. [Proposed] Order Continuing Trial Date and Findings Regarding Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Dkt. 28-1, C.D. Cal. No. 2:20-cr-00319)

Court filing

[Proposed] Order Continuing Trial Date and Findings Regarding Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Dkt. 28-1, C.D. Cal. No. 2:20-cr-00319)

Summary

A [Proposed] Order Continuing Trial Date and Findings Regarding Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act in United States v. Andrew Marnell, No. 2:20-cr-00319-RGK, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, filed September 15, 2020 as Doc. 28-1. The proposed order refers to a stipulation filed by the parties on September 15, 2020 and would continue the trial from September 29, 2020 to May 11, 2021. It would also exclude that period in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. It is presented by Assistant United States Attorney Kerry L. Quinn and has a line for the signature of United States District Judge R. Gary Klausner.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed September 15, 2020 in United States v. Andrew Marnell; one of 62 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Filed2020-09-15

Cite this document

“[Proposed] Order Continuing Trial Date and Findings Regarding Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Dkt. 28-1, C.D. Cal. No. 2:20-cr-00319).” U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:20-cr-00319-RGK, Doc. 28-1, filed 2020-09-15. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-marnell-cacd-790198/2020-09-15-order-doc-28-1/, SHA-256 22fb529d339644d9f9685a4151681f39ead8558ba54f8efb4f1194f9e10bf522.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NICOLA T. HANNA 
United States Attorney 
BRANDON D. FOX 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Chief, Criminal Division 
KERRY L. QUINN (Cal. Bar No. 302954) 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Major Frauds Section 
312 North Spring Street, 11th Floor 
Los Angeles, California 90012 
Telephone: (213) 894-5423 
Facsimile: (213) 894-6269 
E-mail: 
Kerry.L.Quinn@usdoj.gov 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
ANDREW MARNELL, 
 
Defendant. 
No. 2:20-CR-319-RGK  
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL 
DATE AND FINDINGS REGARDING 
EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS PURSUANT 
TO SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 
[PROPOSED] TRIAL DATE: 05-11-2021 
 
The Court has read and considered the Stipulation Regarding 
Request for (1) Continuance of Trial Date and (2) Findings of 
Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act, filed by the 
parties in this matter on September 15, 2020.  The Court hereby finds 
that the Stipulation, which this Court incorporates by reference into 
this Order, demonstrates facts that support a continuance of the 
trial date in this matter, and provides good cause for a finding of 
excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. 
The Court further finds that:  (i) the ends of justice served by 
the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and 
defendant in a speedy trial; (ii) failure to grant the continuance 
Case 2:20-cr-00319-RGK     Document 28-1     Filed 09/15/20     Page 1 of 2   Page ID
#:180

 
 
2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
would be likely to make a continuation of the proceeding impossible, 
or result in a miscarriage of justice; and (iii) failure to grant the 
continuance would unreasonably deny defendant continuity of counsel 
and would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for 
effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 
diligence. 
THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN: 
1. 
The trial in this matter is continued from September 29, 
2020, to May 11, 2021.  
2. 
The time period of September 29, 2020, to May 11, 2021, 
inclusive, is excluded in computing the time within which the trial 
must commence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(i), 
and (B)(iv).  
3. 
Nothing in this Order shall preclude a finding that other 
provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time 
periods are excluded from the period within which trial must 
commence.  Moreover, the same provisions and/or other provisions of 
the Speedy Trial Act may in the future authorize the exclusion of 
additional time periods from the period within which trial must 
commence. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
 
 
 
 
DATE 
 
HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
Presented by: 
     /s/ 
KERRY L. QUINN 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00319-RGK     Document 28-1     Filed 09/15/20     Page 2 of 2   Page ID
#:181

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cacd.790198.28.1.pdf
Size
36,518 bytes
SHA-256
22fb529d339644d9f9685a4151681f39ead8558ba54f8efb4f1194f9e10bf522
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cacd.790198.28.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top