Court filing
[Proposed] Order Continuing Trial Date and Findings Regarding Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Dkt. 28-1, C.D. Cal. No. 2:20-cr-00319)
Summary
A [Proposed] Order Continuing Trial Date and Findings Regarding Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act in United States v. Andrew Marnell, No. 2:20-cr-00319-RGK, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, filed September 15, 2020 as Doc. 28-1. The proposed order refers to a stipulation filed by the parties on September 15, 2020 and would continue the trial from September 29, 2020 to May 11, 2021. It would also exclude that period in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. It is presented by Assistant United States Attorney Kerry L. Quinn and has a line for the signature of United States District Judge R. Gary Klausner.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed September 15, 2020 in United States v. Andrew Marnell; one of 62 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2020-09-15 |
Cite this document
“[Proposed] Order Continuing Trial Date and Findings Regarding Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Dkt. 28-1, C.D. Cal. No. 2:20-cr-00319).”
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:20-cr-00319-RGK, Doc. 28-1, filed 2020-09-15. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-marnell-cacd-790198/2020-09-15-order-doc-28-1/
, SHA-256 22fb529d339644d9f9685a4151681f39ead8558ba54f8efb4f1194f9e10bf522.Full text
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NICOLA T. HANNA
United States Attorney
BRANDON D. FOX
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
KERRY L. QUINN (Cal. Bar No. 302954)
Assistant United States Attorney
Major Frauds Section
312 North Spring Street, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-5423
Facsimile: (213) 894-6269
E-mail:
Kerry.L.Quinn@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW MARNELL,
Defendant.
No. 2:20-CR-319-RGK
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL
DATE AND FINDINGS REGARDING
EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS PURSUANT
TO SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
[PROPOSED] TRIAL DATE: 05-11-2021
The Court has read and considered the Stipulation Regarding
Request for (1) Continuance of Trial Date and (2) Findings of
Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act, filed by the
parties in this matter on September 15, 2020. The Court hereby finds
that the Stipulation, which this Court incorporates by reference into
this Order, demonstrates facts that support a continuance of the
trial date in this matter, and provides good cause for a finding of
excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161.
The Court further finds that: (i) the ends of justice served by
the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and
defendant in a speedy trial; (ii) failure to grant the continuance
Case 2:20-cr-00319-RGK Document 28-1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 1 of 2 Page ID
#:180
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
would be likely to make a continuation of the proceeding impossible,
or result in a miscarriage of justice; and (iii) failure to grant the
continuance would unreasonably deny defendant continuity of counsel
and would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for
effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence.
THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:
1.
The trial in this matter is continued from September 29,
2020, to May 11, 2021.
2.
The time period of September 29, 2020, to May 11, 2021,
inclusive, is excluded in computing the time within which the trial
must commence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(i),
and (B)(iv).
3.
Nothing in this Order shall preclude a finding that other
provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time
periods are excluded from the period within which trial must
commence. Moreover, the same provisions and/or other provisions of
the Speedy Trial Act may in the future authorize the exclusion of
additional time periods from the period within which trial must
commence.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE
HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presented by:
/s/
KERRY L. QUINN
Assistant United States Attorney
Case 2:20-cr-00319-RGK Document 28-1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
#:181File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.790198.28.1.pdf
- Size
- 36,518 bytes
- SHA-256
- 22fb529d339644d9f9685a4151681f39ead8558ba54f8efb4f1194f9e10bf522
- Original
- PACER (login required)