Order — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Dkt. 28-1, C.D. Cal. No. 2:20-cr-00319)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-cr-00319-RGK · Doc. 28-1 · 2020-09-15 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NICOLA T. HANNA 
United States Attorney 
BRANDON D. FOX 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Chief, Criminal Division 
KERRY L. QUINN (Cal. Bar No. 302954) 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Major Frauds Section 
312 North Spring Street, 11th Floor 
Los Angeles, California 90012 
Telephone: (213) 894-5423 
Facsimile: (213) 894-6269 
E-mail: 
Kerry.L.Quinn@usdoj.gov 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
ANDREW MARNELL, 
 
Defendant. 
No. 2:20-CR-319-RGK  
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL 
DATE AND FINDINGS REGARDING 
EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS PURSUANT 
TO SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 
[PROPOSED] TRIAL DATE: 05-11-2021 
 
The Court has read and considered the Stipulation Regarding 
Request for (1) Continuance of Trial Date and (2) Findings of 
Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act, filed by the 
parties in this matter on September 15, 2020.  The Court hereby finds 
that the Stipulation, which this Court incorporates by reference into 
this Order, demonstrates facts that support a continuance of the 
trial date in this matter, and provides good cause for a finding of 
excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. 
The Court further finds that:  (i) the ends of justice served by 
the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and 
defendant in a speedy trial; (ii) failure to grant the continuance 
Case 2:20-cr-00319-RGK     Document 28-1     Filed 09/15/20     Page 1 of 2   Page ID
#:180

 
 
2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
would be likely to make a continuation of the proceeding impossible, 
or result in a miscarriage of justice; and (iii) failure to grant the 
continuance would unreasonably deny defendant continuity of counsel 
and would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for 
effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 
diligence. 
THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN: 
1. 
The trial in this matter is continued from September 29, 
2020, to May 11, 2021.  
2. 
The time period of September 29, 2020, to May 11, 2021, 
inclusive, is excluded in computing the time within which the trial 
must commence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(i), 
and (B)(iv).  
3. 
Nothing in this Order shall preclude a finding that other 
provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time 
periods are excluded from the period within which trial must 
commence.  Moreover, the same provisions and/or other provisions of 
the Speedy Trial Act may in the future authorize the exclusion of 
additional time periods from the period within which trial must 
commence. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
 
 
 
 
DATE 
 
HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
Presented by: 
     /s/ 
KERRY L. QUINN 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00319-RGK     Document 28-1     Filed 09/15/20     Page 2 of 2   Page ID
#:181

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cacd.790198.28.1.pdf

Size

36,518 bytes

SHA-256

22fb529d339644d9f9685a4151681f39ead8558ba54f8efb4f1194f9e10bf522

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cacd.790198.28.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)