Court filing
Request for Hearing Date by PacMar Technologies LLC — United States v. Kao (Dkt. 185, D. Haw. No. 1:21-cr-00061)
Filed February 18, 2026 in United States v. Kao; one of 50 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2026-02-18 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii · No. 1:21-cr-00061-LEK · Doc. 185 · 2026-02-18 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Bert T. Kobayashi, Jr.* Alan M. Goda* Charles W. Gall* Neal T. Gota Charles D. Hunter Robert K. Ichikawa* Christopher T. Kobayashi* Jan M. L. Y. Kutsunai* David M. Louie* Nicholas R. Monlux Jonathan S. Moore Aaron R. Mun Bruce A. Nakamura* Kenneth M. Nakasone* Harry Y. Oda Jesse W. Schiel* Craig K. Shikuma* Timothy T. Silvester Lex R. Smith* Joseph A. Stewart* Brian D. Tongg David B. Tongg* Caycie K. G. Wong *A Law Corporation Of Counsel: Kenneth Y. Sugita* John R. Aube* Wendell H. Fuji* Clifford K. Higa* Burt T. Lau* Larry L. Myers* Gregory M. Sato* David Y. Suzuki* Andrew M. Carmody Ashley L. Choo Olivia D. Grodzka Ying Gu Justin Hart Drew K. Ichikawa Daniel K. Jacob Austin H. Jim On Stephen G. K. Kaneshiro Travis Y. Kuwahara Ryan D. Louie Zachary K. Shikada Reece Y. Tanaka February 18, 2026 Via PACER (CM/ECF): Honorable Leslie E. Kobayashi Senior United States District Judge District of Hawaii 300 Ala Moana Blvd. Honolulu, HI 96850 Re: United States v. Martin Kao, CR 21-00061 LEK (Wire Fraud) Dear Judge Kobayashi: Movant PACMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC f/k/a MARTIN DEFENSE GROUP, LLC f/k/a NAVATEK LLC (“PacMar”), by and through its undersigned counsel, respectfully requests that this Court schedule a hearing to determine the amount of restitution owed to PacMar, based on a renewed/updated request to be filed with the Court. The original restitution hearing was requested by the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(5) [Dkt. 168]. The hearing was held on April 30, 2025, and the amounts owed to PacMar as requested then were denied by this Court without prejudice, subject to further documentation and refinement of the request [Dkt. 180]. PacMar respectfully requests that the Court schedule a hearing at a time convenient to the Court to hear and determine the amount of restitution owed to PacMar based on a forthcoming renewed request for restitution which will be promptly filed with the Court upon the scheduling of the hearing. If the Court prefers a different procedure, please let us know and we will of course be happy to accommodate whatever procedure is easiest for the Court. 999 Bishop Street, Suite 2600, Honolulu, HI 96813 | Tel: 808-535-5700 | Fax: 808-535-5799 | www.ksglaw.com | jws@ksglaw.com Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK Document 185 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID.2254 Honorable Leslie E. Kobayashi February 18, 2026 Page 2 Very truly yours, /s/ Jesse W. Schiel DAVID M. LOUIE JESSE W. SCHIEL for KOBAYASHI, SUGITA & GODA, LLP Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK Document 185 Filed 02/18/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID.2255
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.hid.154417.185.0.pdf
- Size
- 524,444 bytes
- SHA-256
- f7f402c992b45c5aa2545c43f4e08b386245cab165486ed594d9f483c7e76f7c
- Original
- PACER (login required)