Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Kanyike USA v. Kanyike — U.S. District Court, Central District of California Proposed Order — USA v. Kanyike (Dkt. 23.1)

Court filing

Proposed Order — USA v. Kanyike (Dkt. 23.1)

Filed January 5, 2021 in USA v. Kanyike; one of 27 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Filed2021-01-05

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY · Doc. 23-1 · 2021-01-05 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
NICOLA T. HANNA 
United States Attorney 
BRANDON D. FOX 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Chief, Criminal Division 
RICHARD E. ROBINSON (Cal. Bar No. 90840) 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Major Frauds Section 
1100 United States Courthouse 
312 North Spring Street 
Los Angeles, California 90012 
Telephone: (213) 894-0713 
Facsimile: (213) 894-6269 
E-mail: 
Richard.Robinson@usdoj.gov 
 
DANIEL S. KAHN 
Acting Chief, Fraud Section 
BENJAMIN A. SALTZMAN 
Trial Attorney (NY Bar No. 5151477) 
Criminal Division, Fraud Section 
United States Department of Justice 
 
1400 New York Avenue, NW 
 
Washington, DC 20005 
Phone: (202)514-0337 
 
Email: Benjamin.Saltzman@usdoj.gov 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
 
 
v. 
 
HASSAN KANYIKE, 
 
Defendant. 
 
 
No. CR 20-mj-05936 
 
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 
REGARDING DISCOVERY CONTAINING 
PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 
AND PRIVACY ACT INFORMATION  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
The Court has read and considered the parties’ Stipulation for 
a Protective Order Regarding Discovery Containing Personal 
Identifying Information and Privacy Act Information, filed by the 
Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY     Document 23-1     Filed 01/05/21     Page 1 of 8   Page ID
#:104

 
2 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
government and defendant Hassan Kanyike (“defendant”) in this matter 
on January 5, 2021, which this Court incorporates by reference into 
this order, and FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN the Court hereby FINDS AND 
ORDERS as follows:   
1. 
The government’s discovery in this case relates to 
defendant’s alleged crime, that is, a violation of 18 U.S.C.        
§ 1344(2) (Bank Fraud).   
2. 
 A protective order for the discovery is necessary so that 
the government can produce to the defense materials containing third 
parties’ PII.  The Court finds that disclosure of this information 
without limitation risks the privacy and security of the 
information’s legitimate owners.  Because the government has an 
ongoing obligation to protect third parties’ PII, the government 
cannot produce to defendant an unredacted set of discovery 
containing this information without this Court entering the 
Protective Order.  Moreover, PII makes up a significant part of the 
discovery in this case and such information itself, in many 
instances, has evidentiary value.  If the government were to attempt 
to redact all this information in strict compliance with Federal 
Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1, the Central District of 
California’s Local Rules regarding redaction, and the Privacy Policy 
of the United States Judicial Conference, the defense would receive 
a set of discovery that would be highly confusing and difficult to 
understand, and it would be challenging for defense counsel to 
adequately evaluate the case, provide advice to defendant, or 
prepare for trial. 
3. 
An order is also necessary because the government intends 
to produce to the defense materials that may contain information 
Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY     Document 23-1     Filed 01/05/21     Page 2 of 8   Page ID
#:105

 
3 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
within the scope of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (“Privacy Act 
Information”).  The Court finds that, to the extent that these 
materials contain Privacy Act information, disclosure is authorized 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11). 
4. 
The purpose of this Protective Order is therefore to 
(a) allow the government to comply with its discovery obligations 
while protecting this sensitive information from unauthorized 
dissemination, and (b) provide the defense with sufficient 
information to adequately represent defendant.   
5. 
Accordingly, the discovery that the government will 
provide to defense counsel in the above-captioned case will be 
subject to this Protective Order, as follows: 
a. 
 As used herein, “PII Materials” includes any 
information that can be used to identify a person, including a name, 
address, date of birth, Social Security number, driver’s license 
number, telephone number, account number, email address, or personal 
identification number. 
b. 
 “Confidential Information” refers to any document or 
information containing PII Materials that the government produces to 
the defense pursuant to this Protective Order and any copies 
thereof. 
c. 
“Defense Team” includes (1) defendant’s counsel of 
record (“defense counsel”); (2) other attorneys at defense counsel’s 
law firm who may be consulted regarding case strategy in this case; 
(3) defense investigators who are assisting defense counsel with 
this case; (4) retained experts or potential experts; and 
(5) paralegals, legal assistants, and other support staff to defense 
counsel who are providing assistance on this case.  The Defense Team 
Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY     Document 23-1     Filed 01/05/21     Page 3 of 8   Page ID
#:106

 
4 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
does not include defendant, defendant’s family members, or any other 
associates of defendant. 
d. 
The government is authorized to provide defense 
counsel with Confidential Information marked with the following 
legend: “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION -- CONTENTS SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE 
ORDER.”  The government may put that legend on the digital medium 
(such as DVD or hard drive) or simply label a digital folder on the 
digital medium to cover the content of that digital folder.  The 
government may also redact any PII contained in the production of 
Confidential Information. 
e. 
If defendant objects to a designation that material 
contains Confidential Information, the parties shall meet and 
confer.  If the parties cannot reach an agreement regarding 
defendant’s objection, defendant may apply to this Court to have the 
designation removed. 
f. 
Defendant and the Defense Team shall use the 
Confidential Information solely to prepare for any pretrial motions, 
plea negotiations, trial, and sentencing hearing in this case, as 
well as any appellate and post-conviction proceedings. 
g. 
The Defense Team shall not permit anyone other than 
the Defense Team to have possession of Confidential Information, 
including defendant, while outside the presence of the Defense Team. 
h. 
At no time, under no circumstance, will any 
Confidential Information be left in the possession, custody, or 
control of defendant, regardless of defendant’s custody status. 
i. 
Defendant may review PII Materials only in the 
presence of a member of the Defense Team, who shall ensure that 
defendant is never left alone with any PII Materials.  At the 
Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY     Document 23-1     Filed 01/05/21     Page 4 of 8   Page ID
#:107

 
5 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
conclusion of any meeting with defendant at which defendant is 
permitted to view PII Materials, defendant must return any PII 
Materials to the Defense Team, and the member of the Defense Team 
present shall take all such materials with him or her.  Defendant 
may not take any PII Materials out of the room in which defendant is 
meeting with the Defense Team. 
j. 
Defendant may see and review Confidential Information 
as permitted by this Protective Order, but defendant may not copy, 
keep, maintain, or otherwise possess any Confidential Information in 
this case at any time.  Defendant also may not write down or 
memorialize any data or information contained in the Confidential 
Information.   
k. 
The Defense Team may review Confidential Information 
with a witness or potential witness in this case, including 
defendant.  A member of the Defense Team must be present if PII 
Materials are being shown to a witness or potential witness. Before 
being shown any portion of Confidential Information, however, any 
witness or potential witness must be informed of, and agree in 
writing to be bound by, the requirements of the Protective Order.  
No member of the Defense Team shall permit a witness or potential 
witness to retain Confidential Information or any notes generated 
from Confidential Information. 
l. 
The Defense Team shall maintain Confidential 
Information safely and securely, and shall exercise reasonable care 
in ensuring the confidentiality of those materials by (1) not 
permitting anyone other than members of the Defense Team, defendant, 
witnesses, and potential witnesses, as restricted above, to see 
Confidential Information; (2) not divulging to anyone other than 
Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY     Document 23-1     Filed 01/05/21     Page 5 of 8   Page ID
#:108

 
6 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
members of the Defense Team, defendant, witnesses, and potential 
witnesses, the contents of Confidential Information; and (3) not 
permitting Confidential Information to be outside the Defense Team’s 
offices, homes, vehicles, or personal presence.   
m. 
To the extent that defendant, the Defense Team, 
witnesses, or potential witnesses create notes that contain, in 
whole or in part, Confidential Information, or to the extent that 
copies are made for authorized use by members of the Defense Team, 
such notes, copies, or reproductions become Confidential Information 
subject to the Protective Order and must be handled in accordance 
with the terms of the Protective Order. 
n. 
The Defense Team shall use Confidential Information 
only for the litigation of this matter and for no other purpose.  
Litigation of this matter includes any appeal filed by defendant and 
any motion filed by defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.  In the 
event that a party needs to file Confidential Information with the 
Court or divulge the contents of Confidential Information in court 
filings, the filing should be made under seal.  If the Court rejects 
the request to file such information under seal, the party seeking 
to file such information publicly shall provide advance written 
notice to the other party to afford such party an opportunity to 
object or otherwise respond to such intention.  If the other party 
does not object to the proposed filing, the party seeking to file 
such information shall redact any PII Materials and make all 
reasonable attempts to limit the divulging of PII Materials. 
o. 
Any Confidential Information inadvertently produced 
in the course of discovery prior to entry of the Protective Order 
shall be subject to the terms of this Protective Order.  If 
Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY     Document 23-1     Filed 01/05/21     Page 6 of 8   Page ID
#:109

 
7 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
Confidential Information was inadvertently produced prior to entry 
of the Protective Order without being marked “CONFIDENTIAL 
INFORMATION -- CONTENTS SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” the government 
shall reproduce the material with the correct designation and notify 
defense counsel of the error.  The Defense Team shall take immediate 
steps to destroy the unmarked material, including any copies.   
p. 
Confidential Information shall not be used by any 
member of the defense team, in any way, in any other matter, absent 
an order by this Court.  All materials designated subject to the 
Protective Order maintained in the Defense Team’s files shall remain 
subject to the Protective Order unless and until such order is 
modified by this Court.  Upon request of the government, defense 
counsel shall return all PII Materials, certify that such materials 
have been destroyed, or certify that such materials are being kept 
pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code and the 
California Rules of Professional Conduct. 
q. 
In the event that there is a substitution of counsel 
prior to when such documents must be returned, new defense counsel 
must be informed of, and agree in writing to be bound by, the 
requirements of the Protective Order before defense counsel 
transfers any Confidential Information to the new defense counsel.  
New defense counsel’s written agreement to be bound by the terms of 
the Protective Order must be returned to the Assistant U.S. Attorney 
assigned to the case.  New defense counsel then will become the 
Defense Team’s custodian of materials designated subject to the 
Protective Order and shall then become responsible, upon the 
conclusion of appellate and post-conviction proceedings, for: 
(1) returning to the government, certifying the destruction of, or 
Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY     Document 23-1     Filed 01/05/21     Page 7 of 8   Page ID
#:110

 
8 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
retaining pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code 
and the California Rules of Professional Conduct all PII Materials. 
r. 
Defense counsel shall advise defendant and all 
members of the Defense Team of their obligations under the 
Protective Order and ensure their agreement to follow the Protective 
Order, prior to providing defendant and members of the Defense Team 
with access to any materials subject to the Protective Order.  
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
 
 
 
 
DATE 
 
HONORABLE  
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
 
Presented by: 
 
 
  /s/ 
RICHARD E. ROBINSON 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 BENJAMIN A. SALTZMAN 
 Trial Attorney  
Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY     Document 23-1     Filed 01/05/21     Page 8 of 8   Page ID
#:111

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cacd.804252.23.1.pdf
Size
51,928 bytes
SHA-256
28d2a3423721c235be272d1035f149510eb1dbf15873ed72e69be133010ecaa5
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cacd.804252.23.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top