Court filing
Stipulation for Order Regarding Discovery Containing — USA v. Kanyike (Dkt. 23, C.D. Cal.)
Filed January 5, 2021 in USA v. Kanyike; one of 27 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-01-05 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY · Doc. 23 · 2021-01-05 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney BRANDON D. FOX Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division RICHARD E. ROBINSON (Cal. Bar No. 90840) Assistant United States Attorney Major Frauds Section 1100 United States Courthouse 312 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-0713 Facsimile: (213) 894-6269 E-mail: Richard.Robinson@usdoj.gov DANIEL S. KAHN Acting Chief, Fraud Section BENJAMIN A. SALTZMAN Trial Attorney (NY Bar No. 5151477) Criminal Division, Fraud Section United States Department of Justice 1400 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202)514-0337 Email: Benjamin.Saltzman@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HASSAN KANYIKE, Defendant. No. CR 20-mj-05936 STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY CONTAINING: PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PRIVACY ACT INFORMATION PROPOSED ORDER FILED SEPARATELY Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California and Assistant United States Attorney Richard E. Robinson, and defendant Hassan Kanyike (“defendant”), by and through his Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY Document 23 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:95 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 counsel of record, Victor Sherman (collectively the “parties”), for the reasons set forth below, request that the Court enter the proposed protective order (the “Protective Order”) governing the use and dissemination of (1) personal identifying information (“PII”) of real persons pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 16(d)(1), and (2) material that may contain information within the scope of the Privacy Act. Introduction and Grounds for Protective Order 1. On December 8, 2020, defendant was arrested on a complaint issued by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 (2) (bank fraud). (ECF 1.) 2. On December 22, 2020, Charles F. Eick entered an order releasing the defendant from custody. (ECF 18.) 3. A protective order is necessary because the government intends to produce to the defense materials containing third parties’ PII. The government believes that disclosure of this information without limitation risks the privacy and security of the information’s legitimate owners. Because the government has an ongoing obligation to protect third parties’ PII, the government cannot produce to defendant an unredacted set of discovery containing this information without the Court entering the Protective Order. Moreover, PII makes up a significant part of the discovery in this case and such information itself, in many instances, has evidentiary value. If the government were to attempt to redact all this information in strict compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1, the Central District of California’s Local Rules regarding redaction, and the Privacy Policy of the United States Judicial Conference, the defense would receive Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY Document 23 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 9 Page ID #:96 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a set of discovery that would be highly confusing and difficult to understand, and it would be challenging for defense counsel to adequately evaluate the case, provide advice to defendant, or prepare for trial. 4. An order is also necessary because the government intends to produce to the defense materials that may contain information within the scope of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (“Privacy Act Information”). To the extent that these materials contain Privacy Act Information, an order is necessary to authorize disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11). 5. The purpose of the Protective Order is to (a) allow the government to comply with its discovery obligations while protecting this sensitive information from unauthorized dissemination, and (b) provide the defense with sufficient information to adequately represent defendant. Definitions 6. The parties agree to the following definitions: a. “PII Materials” includes any information that can be used to identify a person, including a name, address, date of birth, Social Security number, driver’s license number, telephone number, account number, email address, or personal identification number. b. “Confidential Information” refers to any document or information containing PII Materials that the government produces to the defense pursuant to this Protective Order and any copies thereof. c. “Defense Team” includes (1) defendant’s counsel of record (“defense counsel”); (2) other attorneys at defense counsel’s law firm who may be consulted regarding case strategy in this case; Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY Document 23 Filed 01/05/21 Page 3 of 9 Page ID #:97 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) defense investigators who are assisting defense counsel with this case; (4) retained experts or potential experts; and (5) paralegals, legal assistants, and other support staff to defense counsel who are providing assistance on this case. The Defense Team does not include defendant, defendant’s family members, or any other associates of defendant. Terms of the Protective Order 7. The parties jointly request the Court enter the Protective Order, which will permit the government to produce Confidential Information in a manner that preserves the privacy and security of third parties. The parties agree that the following conditions in the Protective Order will serve these interests: a. The government is authorized to provide defense counsel with Confidential Information marked with the following legend: “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION -- CONTENTS SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” The government may put that legend on the digital medium (such as DVD or hard drive) or simply label a digital folder on the digital medium to cover the content of that digital folder. The government may also redact any PII contained in the production of Confidential Information. b. If defendant objects to a designation that material contains Confidential Information, the parties shall meet and confer. If the parties cannot reach an agreement regarding defendant’s objection, defendant may apply to the Court to have the designation removed. c. Defendant and the Defense Team agree to use the Confidential Information solely to prepare for any pretrial motions, plea negotiations, trial, and sentencing hearing in this case, as Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY Document 23 Filed 01/05/21 Page 4 of 9 Page ID #:98 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 well as any appellate and post-conviction proceedings related to this case. d. The Defense Team shall not permit anyone other than the Defense Team to have possession of Confidential Information, including defendant, while outside the presence of the Defense Team. e. At no time, under no circumstance, will any Confidential Information be left in the possession, custody, or control of defendant, regardless of defendant’s custody status. f. Defendant may review PII Materials only in the presence of a member of the Defense Team, who shall ensure that defendant is never left alone with any PII Materials. At the conclusion of any meeting with defendant at which defendant is permitted to view PII Materials, defendant must return any PII Materials to the Defense Team, and the member of the Defense Team present shall take all such materials with him or her. Defendant may not take any PII Materials out of the room in which defendant is meeting with the Defense Team. g. Defendant may see and review Confidential Information as permitted by this Protective Order, but defendant may not copy, keep, maintain, or otherwise possess any Confidential Information in this case at any time. Defendant also may not write down or memorialize any data or information contained in the Confidential Information. h. The Defense Team may review Confidential Information with a witness or potential witness in this case, including defendant. A member of the Defense Team must be present if PII Materials are being shown to a witness or potential witness. Before being shown any portion of Confidential Information, however, any Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY Document 23 Filed 01/05/21 Page 5 of 9 Page ID #:99 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 witness or potential witness must be informed of, and agree in writing to be bound by, the requirements of the Protective Order. No member of the Defense Team shall permit a witness or potential witness to retain Confidential Information or any notes generated from Confidential Information. i. The Defense Team shall maintain Confidential Information safely and securely, and shall exercise reasonable care in ensuring the confidentiality of those materials by (1) not permitting anyone other than members of the Defense Team, defendant, witnesses, and potential witnesses, as restricted above, to see Confidential Information; (2) not divulging to anyone other than members of the Defense Team, defendant, witnesses, and potential witnesses, the contents of Confidential Information; and (3) not permitting Confidential Information to be outside the Defense Team’s offices, homes, vehicles, or personal presence. j. To the extent that defendant, the Defense Team, witnesses, or potential witnesses create notes that contain, in whole or in part, Confidential Information, or to the extent that copies are made for authorized use by members of the Defense Team, such notes, copies, or reproductions become Confidential Information subject to the Protective Order and must be handled in accordance with the terms of the Protective Order. k. The Defense Team shall use Confidential Information only for the litigation of this matter and for no other purpose. Litigation of this matter includes any appeal filed by defendant and any motion filed by defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In the event that a party needs to file Confidential Information with the Court or divulge the contents of Confidential Information in court Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY Document 23 Filed 01/05/21 Page 6 of 9 Page ID #:100 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 filings, the filing should be made under seal. If the Court rejects the request to file such information under seal, the party seeking to file such information publicly shall provide advance written notice to the other party to afford such party an opportunity to object or otherwise respond to such intention. If the other party does not object to the proposed filing, the party seeking to file such information shall redact any PII Materials and make all reasonable attempts to limit the divulging of PII Materials. l. The parties agree that any Confidential Information inadvertently produced in the course of discovery prior to entry of the Protective Order shall be subject to the terms of the Protective Order. If Confidential Information was inadvertently produced prior to entry of the Protective Order without being marked “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION -- CONTENTS SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” the government shall reproduce the material with the correct designation and notify defense counsel of the error. The Defense Team shall take immediate steps to destroy the unmarked material, including any copies. m. Confidential Information shall not be used by the defendant or Defense Team, in any way, in any other matter, absent an order by this Court. All materials designated subject to the Protective Order maintained in the Defense Team’s files shall remain subject to the Protective Order unless and until such order is modified by this Court. Upon request by the government, defense counsel shall return all PII Materials, certify that such materials have been destroyed, or certify that such materials are being kept pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code and the California Rules of Professional Conduct. Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY Document 23 Filed 01/05/21 Page 7 of 9 Page ID #:101 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 n. In the event that there is a substitution of counsel prior to when such documents must be returned, new defense counsel must be informed of, and agree in writing to be bound by, the requirements of the Protective Order before the undersigned defense counsel transfers any Confidential Information to the new defense counsel. New defense counsel’s written agreement to be bound by the terms of the Protective Order must be returned to the Assistant U.S. Attorney assigned to the case. New defense counsel then will become the Defense Team’s custodian of materials designated subject to the Protective Order and shall then become responsible, upon the conclusion of appellate and post-conviction proceedings, for (1) returning to the government, certifying the destruction of, or retaining pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code and the California Rules of Professional Conduct all PII Materials and (2) returning to the government or certifying the destruction of all CI Materials. o. Defense counsel agrees to advise defendant and all members of the Defense Team of their obligations under the Protective Order and ensure their agreement to follow the Protective Order, prior to providing defendant and members of the Defense Team with access to any materials subject to the Protective Order. p. Defense Counsel has conferred with defendant regarding this stipulation and the proposed order thereon, and defendant agrees to the terms of the proposed order. /// /// /// Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY Document 23 Filed 01/05/21 Page 8 of 9 Page ID #:102 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 q. Accordingly, the parties have agreed to request that the Court enter a protective order in the form submitted herewith. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: December 31, 2020 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney BRANDON D. FOX Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division DANIEL S. KAHN Acting Chief, Fraud Section __/s/____________________________ RICHARD E. ROBINSON Assistant United States Attorney BENJAMIN A. SALTZMAN Trial Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DATED: December 31, 2020 ___/s/________________________ VICTOR SHERMAN Attorney for Defendant HASSAN KANYIKE Case 2:20-mj-05936-DUTY Document 23 Filed 01/05/21 Page 9 of 9 Page ID #:103
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.804252.23.0.pdf
- Size
- 53,418 bytes
- SHA-256
- 6fd767c2b0287fae1b30d180011d4e82e511f7c82d07aa92bb21423f1abe61c4
- Original
- PACER (login required)