Court filing
Video Conferencing Order as to Gregory J. Blotnick — USA v. Blotnick (Dkt. 26, D.N.J.)
Summary
Order Regarding Use of Video Conferencing/Teleconferencing for Felony Pleas, Document 26, dated June 7, 2022 in United States of America v. Gregory J. Blotnick, Crim. No. 21-796 (D.N.J.). In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, the court finds that the defendant has consented to video teleconferencing or teleconferencing after consultation with counsel. It also finds that the proceeding cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice because risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic will unreasonably delay the hearing. The order says the proceeding that day may be conducted by video teleconferencing, and it prints a teleconferencing option for a defendant detained at a facility lacking video capability. The order is dated June 7, 2022 and names Hon. Brian R. Martinotti, United States District Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed June 7, 2022 in Gregory J Blotnick; one of 34 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-06-07 |
Cite this document
“Video Conferencing Order as to Gregory J. Blotnick — USA v. Blotnick (Dkt. 26, D.N.J.).”
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 2:21-cr-00796-BRM, Doc. 26, filed 2022-06-07. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-gregory-j-blotnick-njd-484966/2022-06-07-gov-uscourts-njd-484966-26-0-doc-26/
, SHA-256 996957eb19d6ea91ea8bb66328b43d30f368f838ad871aa16011a60361fa8bb4.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. GREGORY J. BLOTNICK * * * * * * ***** CRIM. NO. 21-796 ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENJENCINGS In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Comi finds: ....Ill_ That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding( s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and ....Ill_ That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be fmiher delayed without serious hann to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons: Risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic will unreasonably delay the hearing, will impact the interests of the government, the defendant, and the public in having a prompt hearing, and will othe1wise cause serious hann to the interests of justice. Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by: ___,;;l=✓=I;...._ Video Teleconferencing ___.l=._I _ Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason: ---'l==-1 - The Defendant ( or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability. D Other: ---'==-- SO ORDERED: June 7, 2022 Hon. Brian R. Martinotti United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey Case 2:21-cr-00796-BRM Document 26 Filed 06/07/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 164
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.484966.26.0.pdf
- Size
- 788,209 bytes
- SHA-256
- 996957eb19d6ea91ea8bb66328b43d30f368f838ad871aa16011a60361fa8bb4
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.484966.26.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)