Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Harun Order that Defendant shall pay restitution in the amount — USA v. Harun (Dkt. 39, S.D. Ga.)

Court filing

Order that Defendant shall pay restitution in the amount — USA v. Harun (Dkt. 39, S.D. Ga.)

Filed January 29, 2024 in USA v. Harun; one of 89 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Filed2024-01-29

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia · No. 3:23-cr-00003-DHB-BKE · Doc. 39 · 2024-01-29 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT U.S.
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ' AUGUSfAul .
DUBLIN DIVISION 
o 
1
ZkMZ'i PM3'31
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
*
#
V. 
* 
CR 323-003
#
GLADYS HARUN 
*
ORDER
On January 23, 2024, the Court conducted a sentencing hearing
for Defendant Gladys Harun, in which it took evidence regarding the
appropriate amount of restitution owed by Defendant. The evidence
supports, and the Court intended, that Defendant pay $547,095.07 in
restitution to the United States Small Business Administration.
Both the Government agent and the Court announced this amount during
the course of the hearing. 
(FTR,i at 2:32:05 and 3:06:58,
respectively). Indeed, the Judgment and Commitment Order entered
on January 26, 2024, reflects the amount of $547,095.07. (Doc. No.
38, at 6.) It has come to the Court's attention that the restitution
amount read into the record at the conclusion of the sentencing
hearing was misstated to be $552,679.14. 
This was a clerical
mistake; the mistake was also recorded in the minutes of the
proceeding. (See Doc. No. 35.)
^ FTR is the For the Record recording system of the district court.
The Court is able to listen to the recording and note the time stamp
of the cited remarks.
Case 3:23-cr-00003-DHB-BKE     Document 39     Filed 01/29/24     Page 1 of 2

Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36, the district court
may correct "clerical mistakes in judgments, orders, or other parts
of the record and errors in the record arising from oversight or
omission." 
The Court's misstatement at the conclusion of the
hearing was an oversight undetected by the Court, counsel, and the
United States Probation Office until the minutes of the proceeding
were docketed and reviewed. A correction to the record is therefore
necessary under Rule 36. 
This correction is in no way a
reassessment or modification of the Court's earlier sentencing
decision and is supported by the record evidence.
Upon the foregoing, the Court hereby ORDERS/ ADJUDGES, and
DECREES that Defendant Gladys Harun shall pay restitution in the
amount of $547,095.07 as reflected in the Judgment and Commitment
Order. The Clerk is directed to correct the docket entry of the
Judgment and Commitment Order to the extent it is incorrect. The
Clerk is further directed to add a remark on the public record that
the minutes of the sentencing proceeding have been amended by this
Order. 
Finally, the Clerk shall provide a copy of this Order to
the court reporter to be appended to any transcription of the
sentencing proceeding.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this 
day of January,
2024 .
UNITED states district JUDS
2
Case 3:23-cr-00003-DHB-BKE     Document 39     Filed 01/29/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gasd.89545.39.0.pdf
Size
537,773 bytes
SHA-256
48f0c9561abdc15d840af383ed71d7cc67228b825753ba47ae0c7de9eaa4a0b7
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gasd.89545.39.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top