Court filing
Order granting 35 Motion for Leave of Absence as to Gladys Harun — USA v. Harun (Dkt. 37, S.D. Ga.)
Summary
An Order filed August 18, 2022 as Dkt. 37 in United States v. Gladys Harun, Case No. 3:22-CR-09, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Dublin Division, granting the motion for leave of absence (Motion 35) by government counsel of record Chris Howard. The order permits counsel to be absent at the requested times while stating that nothing shall prevent the case from going forward and that counsel must provide a substitute.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed August 18, 2022 in USA v. Harun; one of 109 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-08-18 |
Cite this document
“Order granting 35 Motion for Leave of Absence as to Gladys Harun — USA v. Harun (Dkt. 37, S.D. Ga.).”
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, No. 3:22-cr-00009-DHB-BKE, Doc. 37, filed 2022-08-18. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-gladys-harun-gasd-87462/2022-08-18-gov-uscourts-gasd-87462-37-0-doc-37/
, SHA-256 3e770a03b77555d1d4db5dad08d1b8a5c25dbe6c5d472d422f07a1d1d661c919.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA _) . V. ) CASE NO: 3:22-CR-09 A ) ) GLADYS HARUN Chris Howard, counsel of record for the government in the above-styled case, has moved for leave of absence. The Court is mindful that personal and professional obligations require the absence of counsel on occasion. The Court, however, cannot accommodate its schedule to the thousands of attorneys who practice within the Southern District of Georgia. Counsel may be absent at the times requested. However, nothing shall prevent this case from going forward. It is the affirmative obligation of counsel to provide a fitting substitute. SO ORDERED this / & “hh, JUDGE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT iy SOUTHERN DJSTRICT OF GEORGIA
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.gasd.87462.37.0.pdf
- Size
- 204,364 bytes
- SHA-256
- 3e770a03b77555d1d4db5dad08d1b8a5c25dbe6c5d472d422f07a1d1d661c919
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.gasd.87462.37.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)