Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Harun USA v. Harun — U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia Text of Proposed Order — USA v. Harun (Dkt. 35-1, S.D. Ga.)

Court filing

Text of Proposed Order — USA v. Harun (Dkt. 35-1, S.D. Ga.)

Summary

A Text of Proposed Order filed August 18, 2022 as Document 35-1 in United States v. Gladys Harun, Case No. 3:22-CR-09 (3:22-cr-00009-DHB-BKE), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Dublin Division, addressing a motion for leave of absence by government counsel Chris Howard. The one-page proposed order would permit counsel to be absent at the times requested while stating that nothing shall prevent the case from going forward and that counsel has an affirmative obligation to provide a substitute.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed August 18, 2022 in USA v. Harun; one of 109 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Filed2022-08-18

Cite this document

“Text of Proposed Order — USA v. Harun (Dkt. 35-1, S.D. Ga.).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, No. 3:22-cr-00009-DHB-BKE, Doc. 35-1, filed 2022-08-18. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-gladys-harun-gasd-87462/2022-08-18-gov-uscourts-gasd-87462-35-1-doc-35-1/, SHA-256 30e5dfd47abf6899b29bb49d32da856b34457177629d552493c0743ce5ec4f55.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
DUBLIN DIVISION 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
) 
) 
v. 
) 
CASE NO: 3:22-CR-09 
) 
GLADYS HARUN 
) 
Chris Howard, counsel of record for the government in the above-styled case, 
has moved for leave of absence. The Court is mindful that personal and professional 
obligations require the absence of counsel on occasion.  The Court, however, cannot 
accommodate its schedule to the thousands of attorneys who practice within the 
Southern District of Georgia. 
Counsel may be absent at the times requested.  However, nothing shall 
prevent this case from going forward.  It is the affirmative obligation of counsel to 
provide a fitting substitute.    
SO ORDERED this _____ day of August 2022. 
__________________________________  
JUDGE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT  
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
Case 3:22-cr-00009-DHB-BKE     Document 35-1     Filed 08/18/22     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gasd.87462.35.1.pdf
Size
69,224 bytes
SHA-256
30e5dfd47abf6899b29bb49d32da856b34457177629d552493c0743ce5ec4f55
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gasd.87462.35.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top